[jira] Commented: (DERBY-3477) Make format principal names in SystemPermission (e.g. policy files) match the standard way Derby handles authorization identifiers in a Java context.

["Daniel John Debrunner (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3477?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12573538#action_12573538 ] 

Daniel John Debrunner commented on DERBY-3477:
----------------------------------------------

I reproduced the behaviour described in DERBY-2109 with the JVM using the principal_name from the policy file as-is and not obeying the semantics of the Principal implementation. I investigated some more and ended up asking a question over on dev@harmony.apache.org: Here's the thread, no replies yet:

http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/harmony-dev/200802.mbox/%3c47C708C2.7050509@apache.org%3e

> Make format principal names in SystemPermission (e.g. policy files) match the standard way Derby handles authorization identifiers in a Java context.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-3477
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-3477
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: Security
>            Reporter: Daniel John Debrunner
>
> Expected format described in:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2109?focusedCommentId=12561537#action_12561537 
> Comments in DERBY--2109 around patch 10 indicate some issue around implementing this, it would be good to see the code that attempted to implement it to help figure out the problem.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.