You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Sian January <si...@googlemail.com> on 2009/02/16 17:23:23 UTC
M9
Hi everyone,
We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
(20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
release date of Friday 6th March?
I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
like to volunteer.
Thanks,
Sian
--
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: M9
Posted by Tony Wu <wu...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sounds good to me.
>
> -Nathan
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Sian January
> <si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
>> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
>> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
>> release date of Friday 6th March?
>>
>> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
>> like to volunteer.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sian
>>
>> --
>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>>
>
--
Tony Wu
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: M9
Posted by Nathan Beyer <nd...@apache.org>.
Sounds good to me.
-Nathan
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Sian January
<si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
> release date of Friday 6th March?
>
> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
> like to volunteer.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sian
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
Re: M9
Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.
Thank you, Sian.
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:23 PM, Sian January
<si...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
> release date of Friday 6th March?
>
> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
> like to volunteer.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sian
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
--
С уважением,
Алексей Федотов,
ЗАО <<Телеком Экспресс>>
Re: M9
Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
Sian January wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
> release date of Friday 6th March?
>
> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
> like to volunteer.
Sounds good to me too. Thanks Sian.
Tim
Re: M9
Posted by chunrong lai <ch...@gmail.com>.
I think it is OK to publish EUT35 score with drlvm, as part of snapshot
testing. But it seems difficult to pass (100% pass rate?) all EUT35 tests in
M9.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Regis <xu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sian January wrote:
>
>> Any other opinions on postponing for a week?
>>
>> 2009/2/17 chunrong lai <ch...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Maybe we can postpone the release schedule by 1 week?
>>> I see some on-going work at the hand of my colleagues and I.
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Sian January
>>> <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
>>>> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
>>>> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
>>>> release date of Friday 6th March?
>>>>
>>>> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
>>>> like to volunteer.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Sian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>>>> 741598.
>>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
>>>> 3AU
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
> How about EUT? Should we pass all eut before M9?
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Regis.
>
Re: M9
Posted by Regis <xu...@gmail.com>.
Sian January wrote:
> Any other opinions on postponing for a week?
>
> 2009/2/17 chunrong lai <ch...@gmail.com>:
>> Maybe we can postpone the release schedule by 1 week?
>> I see some on-going work at the hand of my colleagues and I.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Sian January
>> <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
>>> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
>>> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
>>> release date of Friday 6th March?
>>>
>>> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
>>> like to volunteer.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Sian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>>> 741598.
>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>>>
>
>
>
How about EUT? Should we pass all eut before M9?
--
Best Regards,
Regis.
Re: How to use gdb to debug interpreter?
Posted by YixunZhou <se...@gmail.com>.
Thank you, I'll try it~
> Hi YiXun
> I think gdb scripts may help you for this problem
> you can define a macro in .gdbinit file like this:
>
> define hsbreak main
> run -Xem:interpreter $arg0
> break hysl_open_shared_library
> continue
> finish
> disable
> break jni.cpp:CallStaticVoidMethod
> continue
> break interpreter.cpp:Opcode_NEW #functions whatever you like
> continue
> dis
> end
>
> then, you can use this macro "hs" in your gdb command to set the breakpoint
> and debug.
>
> Thanks
> Simon
>
> 2009/2/19 YixunZhou <se...@gmail.com>
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I modified harmony to make it support ClassRedefine, but I got a
>> segmentation fault when called new to create an instance of
>> the new version class. I changed to interpreter mode, and found the problem
>> happened when executing OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL.
>>
>> case OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL:
>> // Next line marks the
>> "P_TLS_vmthread->thread_exception" that an exception happened.
>> Opcode_INVOKESPECIAL(frame);
>> // get_current_thread_exception can not
>> handle the exception properly and cause the segment fault.
>> frame.exc = get_current_thread_exception();
>>
>> I was using "printf" to locate the bug, but it is too complicated here. But
>> when I use gdb to trace the execution, it cannot follow the function
>> pointer "(*env)->CallStaticVoidMethod (env, cls, mid, args);" in main.c.
>>
>> So, how can I use gdb to debug the interpreter? Thanks.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best regard,
>> Yixun Zhou
>> seanny2003@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Best regard,
Yixun Zhou
seanny2003@gmail.com
Re: How to use gdb to debug interpreter?
Posted by Simon Zhou <si...@gmail.com>.
Hi YiXun
I think gdb scripts may help you for this problem
you can define a macro in .gdbinit file like this:
define hsbreak main
run -Xem:interpreter $arg0
break hysl_open_shared_library
continue
finish
disable
break jni.cpp:CallStaticVoidMethod
continue
break interpreter.cpp:Opcode_NEW #functions whatever you like
continue
dis
end
then, you can use this macro "hs" in your gdb command to set the breakpoint
and debug.
Thanks
Simon
2009/2/19 YixunZhou <se...@gmail.com>
> Hi all,
>
> I modified harmony to make it support ClassRedefine, but I got a
> segmentation fault when called new to create an instance of
> the new version class. I changed to interpreter mode, and found the problem
> happened when executing OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL.
>
> case OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL:
> // Next line marks the
> "P_TLS_vmthread->thread_exception" that an exception happened.
> Opcode_INVOKESPECIAL(frame);
> // get_current_thread_exception can not
> handle the exception properly and cause the segment fault.
> frame.exc = get_current_thread_exception();
>
> I was using "printf" to locate the bug, but it is too complicated here. But
> when I use gdb to trace the execution, it cannot follow the function
> pointer "(*env)->CallStaticVoidMethod (env, cls, mid, args);" in main.c.
>
> So, how can I use gdb to debug the interpreter? Thanks.
>
>
> --
>
> Best regard,
> Yixun Zhou
> seanny2003@gmail.com
>
>
>
--
>From : Simon.Zhou@MRTL China Lab, Intel
Re: How to use gdb to debug interpreter?
Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.
Hello YixunZhou
1. Have you read [1]? This is a good start.
2. It's hard to guess where your problem is. It's likely you should
manually help the debugger locating CallStaticVoidMethod source on
your computer.
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/harmony/Debugging%20DRLVM%20with%20GDB%20on%20Linux
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:19 AM, YixunZhou <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I modified harmony to make it support ClassRedefine, but I got a
> segmentation fault when called new to create an instance of
> the new version class. I changed to interpreter mode, and found the problem
> happened when executing OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL.
>
> case OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL:
> // Next line marks the
> "P_TLS_vmthread->thread_exception" that an exception happened.
> Opcode_INVOKESPECIAL(frame);
> // get_current_thread_exception can not
> handle the exception properly and cause the segment fault.
> frame.exc = get_current_thread_exception();
>
> I was using "printf" to locate the bug, but it is too complicated here. But
> when I use gdb to trace the execution, it cannot follow the function
> pointer "(*env)->CallStaticVoidMethod (env, cls, mid, args);" in main.c.
>
> So, how can I use gdb to debug the interpreter? Thanks.
>
>
> --
>
> Best regard,
> Yixun Zhou
> seanny2003@gmail.com
>
>
>
--
С уважением,
Алексей Федотов,
ЗАО <<Телеком Экспресс>>
Re: How to use gdb to debug interpreter?
Posted by YixunZhou <se...@gmail.com>.
Thank you. I've read it, but got some confused. I solved the previous
problem, and would try
[1] for new one~
> Please, specify -XX:+crash_handler in the command line of your java.
> It will give you gdb attached to the point of segfault. Then you can
> examine post-mortem state of the VM.
>
> Please, also read [1] for tips on debugging various VM parts.
>
> Pavel.
>
> [1] http://harmony.apache.org/subcomponents/drlvm/debugging_VM_and_JIT.html
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:19 AM, YixunZhou <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I modified harmony to make it support ClassRedefine, but I got a
>> segmentation fault when called new to create an instance of
>> the new version class. I changed to interpreter mode, and found the problem
>> happened when executing OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL.
>>
>> case OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL:
>> // Next line marks the
>> "P_TLS_vmthread->thread_exception" that an exception happened.
>> Opcode_INVOKESPECIAL(frame);
>> // get_current_thread_exception can not
>> handle the exception properly and cause the segment fault.
>> frame.exc = get_current_thread_exception();
>>
>> I was using "printf" to locate the bug, but it is too complicated here. But
>> when I use gdb to trace the execution, it cannot follow the function
>> pointer "(*env)->CallStaticVoidMethod (env, cls, mid, args);" in main.c.
>>
>> So, how can I use gdb to debug the interpreter? Thanks.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best regard,
>> Yixun Zhou
>> seanny2003@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--
Best regard,
Yixun Zhou
seanny2003@gmail.com
Re: How to use gdb to debug interpreter?
Posted by Pavel Pervov <pm...@gmail.com>.
Please, specify -XX:+crash_handler in the command line of your java.
It will give you gdb attached to the point of segfault. Then you can
examine post-mortem state of the VM.
Please, also read [1] for tips on debugging various VM parts.
Pavel.
[1] http://harmony.apache.org/subcomponents/drlvm/debugging_VM_and_JIT.html
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 6:19 AM, YixunZhou <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I modified harmony to make it support ClassRedefine, but I got a
> segmentation fault when called new to create an instance of
> the new version class. I changed to interpreter mode, and found the problem
> happened when executing OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL.
>
> case OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL:
> // Next line marks the
> "P_TLS_vmthread->thread_exception" that an exception happened.
> Opcode_INVOKESPECIAL(frame);
> // get_current_thread_exception can not
> handle the exception properly and cause the segment fault.
> frame.exc = get_current_thread_exception();
>
> I was using "printf" to locate the bug, but it is too complicated here. But
> when I use gdb to trace the execution, it cannot follow the function
> pointer "(*env)->CallStaticVoidMethod (env, cls, mid, args);" in main.c.
>
> So, how can I use gdb to debug the interpreter? Thanks.
>
>
> --
>
> Best regard,
> Yixun Zhou
> seanny2003@gmail.com
>
>
>
How to use gdb to debug interpreter?
Posted by YixunZhou <se...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I modified harmony to make it support ClassRedefine, but I got a
segmentation fault when called new to create an instance of
the new version class. I changed to interpreter mode, and found the
problem happened when executing OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL.
case OPCODE_INVOKESPECIAL:
// Next line marks the
"P_TLS_vmthread->thread_exception" that an exception happened.
Opcode_INVOKESPECIAL(frame);
// get_current_thread_exception can not
handle the exception properly and cause the segment fault.
frame.exc = get_current_thread_exception();
I was using "printf" to locate the bug, but it is too complicated here.
But when I use gdb to trace the execution, it cannot follow the function
pointer "(*env)->CallStaticVoidMethod (env, cls, mid, args);" in main.c.
So, how can I use gdb to debug the interpreter? Thanks.
--
Best regard,
Yixun Zhou
seanny2003@gmail.com
Re: M9
Posted by Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>.
Ok - it looks like there are no objections to doing the milestone a
week later. So the planned dates are:
Feature freeze: Friday 27th February
Code freeze: Friday 6th March
Planned release date: Friday 13th March
Let's try not to postpone it any longer, since we're already looking
at a 4 month gap since M8.
Thanks,
Sian
2009/2/18 Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>:
> Any other opinions on postponing for a week?
>
> 2009/2/17 chunrong lai <ch...@gmail.com>:
>> Maybe we can postpone the release schedule by 1 week?
>> I see some on-going work at the hand of my colleagues and I.
>> Thanks.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Sian January
>> <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
>>> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
>>> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
>>> release date of Friday 6th March?
>>>
>>> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
>>> like to volunteer.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Sian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>>> 741598.
>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
--
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: M9
Posted by xiaoming gu <xi...@gmail.com>.
I want H5826 (global propagation on LIR) committed for M9. Maybe one more
week is better. Thanks.
Xiaoming
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Any other opinions on postponing for a week?
>
> 2009/2/17 chunrong lai <ch...@gmail.com>:
> > Maybe we can postpone the release schedule by 1 week?
> > I see some on-going work at the hand of my colleagues and I.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Sian January
> > <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
> >> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
> >> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
> >> release date of Friday 6th March?
> >>
> >> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
> >> like to volunteer.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Sian
> >>
> >> --
> >> Unless stated otherwise above:
> >> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> >> 741598.
> >> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
> 3AU
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
--
China Runtime Technologies Lab,
SSG/SSD/MRTC, Intel
Re: M9
Posted by Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>.
Any other opinions on postponing for a week?
2009/2/17 chunrong lai <ch...@gmail.com>:
> Maybe we can postpone the release schedule by 1 week?
> I see some on-going work at the hand of my colleagues and I.
> Thanks.
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Sian January
> <si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
>> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
>> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
>> release date of Friday 6th March?
>>
>> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
>> like to volunteer.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sian
>>
>> --
>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
>> 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>>
>
--
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: M9
Posted by chunrong lai <ch...@gmail.com>.
Maybe we can postpone the release schedule by 1 week?
I see some on-going work at the hand of my colleagues and I.
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Sian January
<si...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
> release date of Friday 6th March?
>
> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
> like to volunteer.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sian
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
Re: M9
Posted by Sean Qiu <se...@gmail.com>.
+1
2009/2/17 Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
> release date of Friday 6th March?
>
> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
> like to volunteer.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sian
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
--
Best Regards
Sean, Xiao Xia Qiu
Re: M9
Posted by "Jimmy,Jing Lv" <fi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
2009/2/18 Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>:
> Hi Jimmy,
>
> I agree it would be good to start thinking about milestone builds for
> our Java 6 code at some point, but if we're thinking about an official
> milestone release then I think it would be double the testing and
> would need a separate vote etc. Perhaps it would be worth starting a
> new thread about this to see what people think?
Thanks Sian, yes agreed.
Indeed as I see in our homepage, there's some link to the
snapshot, not the exact official milestone. As I find, the latest
snapshot of java5 is made on Dec 17th. 2008, but java6 snapshot hasn't
updated for years. So just wondering if we can offer an update there?
>
>
> 2009/2/17 Jimmy,Jing Lv <fi...@gmail.com>:
>> Cool Sian!
>>
>> As we see there's some progress on Harmony java6 branch, and it's been
>> long time since last java6 snapshots build(on homepage I see it's on
>> http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/java6/snapshots/, created on
>> May 2007), maybe we can get some a new release for java6 branch as
>> well?
>>
>> 2009/2/17 Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
>>> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
>>> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
>>> release date of Friday 6th March?
>>>
>>> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
>>> like to volunteer.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Sian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
>>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best Regards!
>>
>> Jimmy, Jing Lv
>> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
--
Best Regards!
Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM
Re: M9
Posted by Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Jimmy,
I agree it would be good to start thinking about milestone builds for
our Java 6 code at some point, but if we're thinking about an official
milestone release then I think it would be double the testing and
would need a separate vote etc. Perhaps it would be worth starting a
new thread about this to see what people think?
2009/2/17 Jimmy,Jing Lv <fi...@gmail.com>:
> Cool Sian!
>
> As we see there's some progress on Harmony java6 branch, and it's been
> long time since last java6 snapshots build(on homepage I see it's on
> http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/java6/snapshots/, created on
> May 2007), maybe we can get some a new release for java6 branch as
> well?
>
> 2009/2/17 Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
>> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
>> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
>> release date of Friday 6th March?
>>
>> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
>> like to volunteer.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Sian
>>
>> --
>> Unless stated otherwise above:
>> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
>> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Best Regards!
>
> Jimmy, Jing Lv
> China Software Development Lab, IBM
>
--
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
Re: M9
Posted by "Jimmy,Jing Lv" <fi...@gmail.com>.
Cool Sian!
As we see there's some progress on Harmony java6 branch, and it's been
long time since last java6 snapshots build(on homepage I see it's on
http://people.apache.org/builds/harmony/java6/snapshots/, created on
May 2007), maybe we can get some a new release for java6 branch as
well?
2009/2/17 Sian January <si...@googlemail.com>:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We published M8 on 17th November last year, so I think we're slightly
> overdue now for M9. Can I suggest a feature freeze for M9 this Friday
> (20th), a code freeze the following Friday (27th) and a planned
> release date of Friday 6th March?
>
> I'm happy to co-ordinate the release again unless anyone else would
> like to volunteer.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sian
>
> --
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
>
--
Best Regards!
Jimmy, Jing Lv
China Software Development Lab, IBM