You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "chendihao (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/01/06 03:19:50 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-10282) We can't assure that the first ZK server is active server in MiniZooKeeperCluster

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10282?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13862720#comment-13862720 ] 

chendihao commented on HBASE-10282:
-----------------------------------

Looking for your replay. [~stack] [~liyin] [~streamy]

> We can't assure that the first ZK server is active server in MiniZooKeeperCluster
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-10282
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10282
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 0.94.3
>            Reporter: chendihao
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Thanks to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10274, we're able to run multiple zk servers in minicluster. However, It's confusing to keep the variable activeZKServerIndex as zero and assure the first zk server is always the active one. I think returning the first sever's client port is for testing and it seems that we can directly return the first item of the list. Anyway, the concept of "active" here is not the same as zk's. 
> It's confusing when I read the code so I think we should fix it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)