You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@devicemap.apache.org by "eberhard speer jr." <se...@ducis.net> on 2014/07/07 22:25:19 UTC
DeviceMap .Net Versions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
DeviceMap .Net Versions Release is ready here for review :
http://www.ducis.net/static/docs/dotnet/rel.html
Reza's changes and fixed have been applied and .Net variants of the
Loaders have been implemented.
W3C Simple DDR implementations in VB.Net and C# are ready too, but
needs to be be integrated.
I assume that is to be a separate package, is that correct ?
Apart from that 2 do are :
- - Strong Named Assembly - Signed Assembly Documentation
- - Targeting Frameworks Documentation
esjr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTuwIvAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcdLsH/2wIX38jN1LkuvAp/MKiO9I+
4jQDrxmp8zmq1yrDV9vZq7/NdPPSTdTZJqzvld2LOQGWZI5P+v6KyDkhiFHG9O0n
WNFtbSXE99gLlF+U+4gGdsiVmstfF12lUsVduOJyNHRmbwP4H418e8sXQaXuIXZ8
LFq5jYrkeR9oRQg0u7yYBDkgtfhVl+kHf1nJEoC2+ILKi0j/O9T/UKhFxhN4EyJa
im3rYmcolrgKTjjAqTrifmrkSrJ53ETQJrI7qC2bXGCpzgziJBfoia4JSyjN0ElU
p15fpLxx4pDl49gX+7aRTtK15c3vyHDe7fkV119bZrJEvvQZPwtj1AXavbHBqqs=
=ZtMY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: DeviceMap .Net Versions
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Ideally we should try to match the tag with the version in the POM. So if
the POM says "1.0" as it does now, so should the tag. If you prefer an
extra "0" right awaw, not for subsequent versions, could we add it to the
final POM version, too?
Not sure about extra artifactId for e.g. the "data" repo like
"devicemap-data"?
The current artifactId for "classifier" as "devicemap-java" is a bit
misleading, after all the "devicemap-parent" is actually on top of the
"java" sub-tree.
If the .NET clients use something completely different than Maven then
maybe the term "parent" could be kept there, the descriptive title is
nevertheless "Java Parent".
P.s.: What about the "test-data"? So far only "device-data" (with
artifactId "devicemap-data") is a 1.0 candidate. Do we no longer need those
test-data?
If not needed, then following a tag (I tagged them at least with all the
ODDR sync-ups) it could be purged, otherwise it should also be versioned
like the other repos.
Werner
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Reza Yahoo <re...@yahoo.com.invalid>
wrote:
> When everyone signs off on the build, I was thinking that would be 1.0 and
> I will make a tag. I didn't want to create tags or anything right now cause
> we have a bit of back and forth.
>
> As for 1.0 or 1.0.0, either works. 1.0.0 is better, allows more version
> flexibility.
>
> Something to think about is how we version data vs code...
>
>
Re: DeviceMap .Net Versions
Posted by Reza Yahoo <re...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
When everyone signs off on the build, I was thinking that would be 1.0 and I will make a tag. I didn't want to create tags or anything right now cause we have a bit of back and forth.
As for 1.0 or 1.0.0, either works. 1.0.0 is better, allows more version flexibility.
Something to think about is how we version data vs code...
Re: DeviceMap .Net Versions
Posted by Werner Keil <we...@gmail.com>.
Thanks,
About the documentation and examples here: http://www.rezsoft.org/devicemap/
Where is the exact baseline for 1.0? I did an SVN update just moments ago
and noticed some more incoming changes.
Is the current state considered "1.0 RC1" or 2 or final? As mentioned, at
some point we must tag the artifacts now labelled 1.0, they can't become a
moving target (for that a matching new snapshot like "1.0.1-SNAPSHOT" or
"1.1-SNAPSHOT" seems suitable[?]
Werner
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:25 PM, eberhard speer jr. <se...@ducis.net>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> DeviceMap .Net Versions Release is ready here for review :
>
> http://www.ducis.net/static/docs/dotnet/rel.html
>
> Reza's changes and fixed have been applied and .Net variants of the
> Loaders have been implemented.
>
> W3C Simple DDR implementations in VB.Net and C# are ready too, but
> needs to be be integrated.
> I assume that is to be a separate package, is that correct ?
>
> Apart from that 2 do are :
> - - Strong Named Assembly - Signed Assembly Documentation
> - - Targeting Frameworks Documentation
>
> esjr
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTuwIvAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcdLsH/2wIX38jN1LkuvAp/MKiO9I+
> 4jQDrxmp8zmq1yrDV9vZq7/NdPPSTdTZJqzvld2LOQGWZI5P+v6KyDkhiFHG9O0n
> WNFtbSXE99gLlF+U+4gGdsiVmstfF12lUsVduOJyNHRmbwP4H418e8sXQaXuIXZ8
> LFq5jYrkeR9oRQg0u7yYBDkgtfhVl+kHf1nJEoC2+ILKi0j/O9T/UKhFxhN4EyJa
> im3rYmcolrgKTjjAqTrifmrkSrJ53ETQJrI7qC2bXGCpzgziJBfoia4JSyjN0ElU
> p15fpLxx4pDl49gX+7aRTtK15c3vyHDe7fkV119bZrJEvvQZPwtj1AXavbHBqqs=
> =ZtMY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>