[REVIEW] OAK-4908 in 1.5.13: prefiltering (enabled by default)

[Stefan Egli <st...@apache.org>]

Hi,

I'd like to commit OAK-4908 which would introduce prefiltering for
observation listeners. This is based on OAK-4907 (population of a ChangeSet
during the commit) and OAK-4916 (FilteringObserver-wrapper for the
BackgroundObserver) - and it works fine with the new filters (OAK-5019-23)
too.

The reason I raise this on the list is that this is quite a change and it
would thus be good if there was an agreement that we want this in for 1.5.13
(Monday). I know it's a bit a tight schedule, but I think it would be good
to have that in to allow for more testing in real life scenarios. I've thus
marked it a blocker for 1.5.13. If you disagree, pls let me know.

Wdyt?

Cheers,
Stefan

Re: [REVIEW] OAK-4908 in 1.5.13: prefiltering (enabled by default)

[Stefan Egli <st...@apache.org>]

FYI: Assuming lazy consensus I've now committed this one to unblock
1.5.13. We can do post-review in case.

Cheers,
Stefan

On 04/11/16 15:59, "Stefan Egli" <st...@apache.org> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>I'd like to commit OAK-4908 which would introduce prefiltering for
>observation listeners. This is based on OAK-4907 (population of a
>ChangeSet
>during the commit) and OAK-4916 (FilteringObserver-wrapper for the
>BackgroundObserver) - and it works fine with the new filters (OAK-5019-23)
>too.
>
>The reason I raise this on the list is that this is quite a change and it
>would thus be good if there was an agreement that we want this in for
>1.5.13
>(Monday). I know it's a bit a tight schedule, but I think it would be good
>to have that in to allow for more testing in real life scenarios. I've
>thus
>marked it a blocker for 1.5.13. If you disagree, pls let me know.
>
>Wdyt?
>
>Cheers,
>Stefan
>
>