You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tomcat.apache.org by pero <pe...@antaramusic.de> on 2001/09/20 23:48:35 UTC

RE: tomcat 4 (final) quits without notice [2nd UPDATE]

I forgot to say that other Java-Applications (I am using JAMES) are running
and running and running and ...


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pero [mailto:pero@antaramusic.de]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 11:45 PM
> To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> Subject: tomcat 4 (final) quits without notice [UPDATE]
>
>
> here's the first update on that:
> ibm's jvm doesn't work either... to make it clear: I do not say that this
> *MUST* be a tomcat-bug, but I would appreciate sharing any experience with
> that and I would be thankful for *any* suggestion (besides
> writing a script
> that
> restarts tomcat :-)
>
> pero
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pero [mailto:pero@antaramusic.de]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 8:55 PM
> > To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
> > Subject: tomcat 4 (final) quits without notice
> >
> >
> > Hi there,
> >
> > After months of developing with tomcat 4 (yes, I was there from the very
> > first beta :-) I always considered tomcat to run in the production
> > environment, too.
> > While it is working fine on my staging-server (Suse Linux 7.2,
> Sun's 1.3.1
> > JDK) it stops after a random amount of time on my production
> server, which
> > is also Suse Linux 7.2.
> > According to the last discussions on the mailinglists I started using
> > different VMs (Sun's 1.3.0, 1.3.1 and 1.4.0 Beta 2) but the
> result was the
> > same. Now I'm on my last try with IBM's 1.3-9.0 (which I did
> not intend to
> > use...)
> > If that doesn't work either - I got a very serious problem, because the
> > project I am working on is going to go final very soon.
> >
> > In another project (my band's homepage) I use tomcat 3.1 since
> january and
> > all works fine... It works under Suse 6.2 and Sun's 1.3.0.
> >
> > Are there others facing the "die"-problem?
> >
> > pero
> >
> >
>
>