You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com> on 2013/03/19 17:48:19 UTC
Are there plans for 4.2.1?
I am still trying to figure out Solr release cadence. They seem to be
pretty frequent :-)
However, 4.2 broke one of my config (copyField one) and I am now curious
when the release that fixes it will be out. I know it is fixed in the
source already.
Regards,
Alex.
P.s. I also have a suggested DIH minor feature (with big consequences :-) )
that I believe is all ready to be incorporated (including tests), but not
sure how to convince anybody to look at it (SOLR-4530).
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
Re: Are there plans for 4.2.1?
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
4.2.1 might be out within a week or so.
- Mark
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am still trying to figure out Solr release cadence. They seem to be
> pretty frequent :-)
>
> However, 4.2 broke one of my config (copyField one) and I am now curious
> when the release that fixes it will be out. I know it is fixed in the
> source already.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
> P.s. I also have a suggested DIH minor feature (with big consequences :-) )
> that I believe is all ready to be incorporated (including tests), but not
> sure how to convince anybody to look at it (SOLR-4530).
>
> Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
> once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
Re: Are there plans for 4.2.1?
Posted by Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Steve,
I appreciate the work and really fast response (sorry, if it wasn't clear).
The issue was that I used that particular feature as a 'demo' of copyField
in an upcoming training material. So, it is not the (temporary) workaround
that is an issue, but that I had to rethink the explanation. However, 4.2.1
in a week (or so) is going to make the issue go away just in time for me.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> The copyField fix (SOLR-4567) will be part of 4.2.1 - I backported it to
> the 4.2.1 branch.
>
> By the way, did you see the workaround I posted in the SOLR-4567
> description?:
>
> -----
> UPDATE: Workaround: instead of using a single copyField directive matching
> multiple explicit source fields […] use multiple copyField directives, each
> giving an explicit field name. So the above example using this workaround
> would be:
> <field name="addr_from" type="email" indexed="true" stored="true"
> required="true" />
> <field name="addr_to" type="email" multiValued="true" indexed="true"
> stored="true" required="true" />
> <copyField source="addr_from" dest="text" />
> <copyField source="addr_to" dest="text" />
> -----
>
> Steve
>
> On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I am still trying to figure out Solr release cadence. They seem to be
> > pretty frequent :-)
> >
> > However, 4.2 broke one of my config (copyField one) and I am now curious
> > when the release that fixes it will be out. I know it is fixed in the
> > source already.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alex.
> > P.s. I also have a suggested DIH minor feature (with big consequences
> :-) )
> > that I believe is all ready to be incorporated (including tests), but not
> > sure how to convince anybody to look at it (SOLR-4530).
> >
> > Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
> > - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
> > once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
>
>
Re: Are there plans for 4.2.1?
Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
Hi Alex,
The copyField fix (SOLR-4567) will be part of 4.2.1 - I backported it to the 4.2.1 branch.
By the way, did you see the workaround I posted in the SOLR-4567 description?:
-----
UPDATE: Workaround: instead of using a single copyField directive matching multiple explicit source fields […] use multiple copyField directives, each giving an explicit field name. So the above example using this workaround would be:
<field name="addr_from" type="email" indexed="true" stored="true" required="true" />
<field name="addr_to" type="email" multiValued="true" indexed="true" stored="true" required="true" />
<copyField source="addr_from" dest="text" />
<copyField source="addr_to" dest="text" />
-----
Steve
On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:48 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am still trying to figure out Solr release cadence. They seem to be
> pretty frequent :-)
>
> However, 4.2 broke one of my config (copyField one) and I am now curious
> when the release that fixes it will be out. I know it is fixed in the
> source already.
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
> P.s. I also have a suggested DIH minor feature (with big consequences :-) )
> that I believe is all ready to be incorporated (including tests), but not
> sure how to convince anybody to look at it (SOLR-4530).
>
> Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
> - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
> once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)