You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Glen Daniels <gd...@macromedia.com> on 2002/07/11 14:19:46 UTC

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10660] New: - traps Axis

"Trap"?  This is 2002, not 1980, dude!  We have Exceptions now. :)

--G

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bugzilla@apache.org [mailto:bugzilla@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 2:58 PM
> To: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> Subject: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10660] New: - <responseFlow/> traps Axis
> 
> 
> DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
> RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
> <http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10660>.
> ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
> INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
> 
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10660
> 
> <responseFlow/> traps Axis
> 
>            Summary: <responseFlow/> traps Axis
>            Product: Axis
>            Version: current (nightly)
>           Platform: Other
>         OS/Version: Other
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: Normal
>           Priority: Other
>          Component: Deployment / Registries
>         AssignedTo: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
>         ReportedBy: dug@us.ibm.com
>                 CC: axis-dev@xml.apache.org
> 
> 
> If in my global config section of the wsdd I have:
>   <responseFlow/>
> it makes Axis trap with:
> 
> org.apache.axis.ConfigurationException: java.lang.NullPointerException
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>         at 
> org.apache.axis.deployment.wsdd.WSDDChain.<init>(WSDDChain.java:119)
>         at 
> org.apache.axis.deployment.wsdd.WSDDResponseFlow.<init>(WSDDResponseF
> low.java:83)
>         at 
> org.apache.axis.deployment.wsdd.WSDDGlobalConfiguration.<init>(WSDDGl
> obalConfiguration.java:101)
>         at 
> org.apache.axis.deployment.wsdd.WSDDDeployment.<init>(WSDDDeployment.
> java:258)
>         at 
> org.apache.axis.deployment.wsdd.WSDDDocument.<init>(WSDDDocument.java
> :103)
> 
> 
> even though that's valid XML.
>