You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by Taha Hafeez <ta...@gmail.com> on 2010/12/28 03:00:50 UTC

Small typo in Documentation

Hi

On page http://tapestry.apache.org/symbols.html

Recursive Symbols

It is possible and valid to define one symbol in terms of one *ore* more
other symbols.

regards
Taha

Re: Small typo in Documentation

Posted by Bob Harner <bo...@gmail.com>.

Okay, I fixed it in the Confluence source (and it should be propagated
to the http://tapestry.apache.org/symbols.html within an hour or two).
 Thanks for reporting it!

On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Taha Hafeez <ta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> On page http://tapestry.apache.org/symbols.html
>
> Recursive Symbols
>
> It is possible and valid to define one symbol in terms of one *ore* more
> other symbols.
>
> regards
> Taha
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org