You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@trafficserver.apache.org by "Adam W. Dace (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/11/08 04:08:33 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (TS-3174) Kill LRU Ram Cache

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3174?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14203178#comment-14203178 ] 

Adam W. Dace edited comment on TS-3174 at 11/8/14 3:07 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------

While I actually use this feature of TrafficServer, as it's a little bit faster for me...I have no objections to it disappearing,
especially if it's proving to be a maintenance headache.


was (Author: adace):
While I actually use this feature of TrafficServer, as it's a -little- bit faster for me...I have no objections to it disappearing,
especially if it's proving to be a maintenance headache.

> Kill LRU Ram Cache
> ------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-3174
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3174
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Susan Hinrichs
>             Fix For: 6.0.0
>
>
> Comment from [~zwoop]. Now that CLFUS is both stable, and default, is there even a reason to keep the old LRU cache. If no objections should remove for the next major version change.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)