You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@solr.apache.org by Mikhail Khludnev <mk...@apache.org> on 2023/03/01 07:21:10 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Hello, colleagues!
How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a known
bug/limitation?
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of great
> things to show off in 9.2:
>
> - Jetty 10
> - JAX-RS
> - Lucene 9.5
>
> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th, unless
> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
>
> - Houston
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
A caveat: Cyrillic!
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
So the documented blockers are almost resolved, thanks Shawn!
Eric decided, for the best, that SOLR-10466 should wait for Solr 9.3.
I'm probably planning on cutting a release later today Alessandro, but if
there is a re-spin, I'd be happy to include SOLR-16674. (Or if y'all think
it's ready to go today)
- Houston
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 1:00 PM Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>
wrote:
> I checked internally with my colleagues and it seems that the only issue
> that is near the merge point is this one:
>
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1435
>
> Definitely nice to have (also to show progress in the neural search side of
> things) but I wouldn't say it's a blocker.
>
> I assume it will be merged in 4-5 days, it this time is reasonable I can
> discuss it with Elia and make it a priority so we include it in 9.2!
>
> Cheers
> --------------------------
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>
> e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>
>
> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>
> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 16:58, Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I am super close on SOLR-10466, barring any issues being raised on
> > review. Going to keep pushing this afternoon to get it to done. Only
> > thirteen more uses of the deprecated method in the test code, and
> honestly,
> > since we aren’t deleting this method in 9.2, if I don’t get the remaining
> > test converted today, then SOLR-10466 could still be merged. It would
> be
> > great if folks could review https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1256 <
> > https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1256> and give me a +1/LGTM on the
> > work that I’ve done.
> >
> > For SOLR-8975, there are two other sub issues that aren’t SOLR010466, and
> > they are not anything that would block 9.2 going out. Issue SOLR-8975
> is
> > also kind of an umbrella issue that isn’t tied to 9.2 either.
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Mar 15, 2023, at 10:58 AM, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hey everyone,
> > >
> > > Trying to get organized around the release. From my point of view, this
> > is
> > > the state of unfinished work:
> > >
> > > Looking at the Solr 9.2 blockers (
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR/versions/12352353), we
> > > currently have two:
> > >
> > > - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>: It
> > looks
> > > like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had
> > movement
> > > since October.
> > > - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
> > (assigned
> > > to Shawn): This has a good amount of commits, but the comments seem
> > like it
> > > isn't done yet?
> > > I think this is the only thing we can't drop from this release, since
> > > there is already a good amount of work done in the 9.2 line.
> > >
> > > Shawn, do you still want to move forward with both of these for the 9.2
> > > release? If so, do you have a timeline?
> > >
> > > From this thread:
> > >
> > > - SOLR-8975, SOLR-10466: Eric, how are these coming along, do you
> still
> > > want to get them in for this release?
> > > - Alessandro, how are your issues coming along, do you think they
> > should
> > > be merged in.a few days? Also do you have links to the JIRAs?
> > >
> > > If this is all wrapped up, I'll start the release tomorrow.
> > >
> > > - Houston
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hey everyone,
> > >>
> > >> I'm planning on cutting the branch today, and seeing what our blockers
> > >> look like.
> > >>
> > >> Once again, please ensure the JIRAs that must make it into 9.2 have
> the
> > >> blocker attribute added.
> > >> Otherwise I'm going to move forward in a few days, unless there are
> > issues
> > >> that we see arise.
> > >>
> > >> - Houston
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Alessandro Benedetti <
> > a.benedetti@sease.io>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> I have some issues my team is working on, and we would potentially
> > love to
> > >>> see them in 9.2 .
> > >>> But I don't want to block anything and I suspect they'll get merged
> by
> > the
> > >>> end of this week.
> > >>>
> > >>> Any estimation for the branch cut? So we may potentially include
> them.
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers
> > >>> --------------------------
> > >>> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> > >>> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> > >>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> > >>> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> > >>>
> > >>> e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> > >>> Consulting | Training | Open Source
> > >>>
> > >>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> > >>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> > >>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> > >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> > >>> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 19:08, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow.
> > >>> Please
> > >>>> do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> - Houston
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb <an...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> hi Houston,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in
> progress
> > -
> > >>>>> would
> > >>>>> like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm
> away
> > >>> so
> > >>>>> won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at
> the
> > >>>>> earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure
> I'm
> > >>>> doing
> > >>>>> it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could
> > >>> chat
> > >>>>> about it then.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> thanks,
> > >>>>> Andy
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Hey everyone,
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How
> > >>> are we
> > >>>>>> doing with regards to blockers right now?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not
> > >>> completed. Do
> > >>>>> we
> > >>>>>> have updates for these items?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653>
> > >>>>>> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>
> > >>>>>> - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
> > >>>>>> - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681>
> > >>>>>> (mentioned
> > >>>>>> above)
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to
> > >>>> block
> > >>>>>> 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am
> > >>>> leaning
> > >>>>>> towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think
> it's
> > >>>>>> feasible we can move forward without it.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> - Houston
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <jan.asf@cominvent.com
> >
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step +
> > >>> throw a
> > >>>>> http
> > >>>>>>> 400 error.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Jan Høydahl
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mkhl@apache.org
> > >>>> :
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hello, colleagues!
> > >>>>>>>> How can we triage
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
> > >>>>>>>> Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
> > >>>>>>>> I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a
> > >>>> known
> > >>>>>>>> bug/limitation?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <
> > >>>> houston@apache.org>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hey everyone,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a
> > >>> ton
> > >>>> of
> > >>>>>>> great
> > >>>>>>>>> things to show off in 9.2:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> - Jetty 10
> > >>>>>>>>> - JAX-RS
> > >>>>>>>>> - Lucene 9.5
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March
> > >>> 6th,
> > >>>>>> unless
> > >>>>>>>>> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> - Houston
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Sincerely yours
> > >>>>>>>> Mikhail Khludnev
> > >>>>>>>> https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
> > >>>>>>>> A caveat: Cyrillic!
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> > _______________________
> > Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> > http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> > http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> > http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> > Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw
> >
> >
> > This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> > Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> > whether attachments are marked as such.
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>.
I checked internally with my colleagues and it seems that the only issue
that is near the merge point is this one:
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1435
Definitely nice to have (also to show progress in the neural search side of
things) but I wouldn't say it's a blocker.
I assume it will be merged in 4-5 days, it this time is reasonable I can
discuss it with Elia and make it a priority so we include it in 9.2!
Cheers
--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*
e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source
Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>
On Wed, 15 Mar 2023 at 16:58, Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com>
wrote:
> I am super close on SOLR-10466, barring any issues being raised on
> review. Going to keep pushing this afternoon to get it to done. Only
> thirteen more uses of the deprecated method in the test code, and honestly,
> since we aren’t deleting this method in 9.2, if I don’t get the remaining
> test converted today, then SOLR-10466 could still be merged. It would be
> great if folks could review https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1256 <
> https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1256> and give me a +1/LGTM on the
> work that I’ve done.
>
> For SOLR-8975, there are two other sub issues that aren’t SOLR010466, and
> they are not anything that would block 9.2 going out. Issue SOLR-8975 is
> also kind of an umbrella issue that isn’t tied to 9.2 either.
>
>
>
> > On Mar 15, 2023, at 10:58 AM, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > Trying to get organized around the release. From my point of view, this
> is
> > the state of unfinished work:
> >
> > Looking at the Solr 9.2 blockers (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR/versions/12352353), we
> > currently have two:
> >
> > - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>: It
> looks
> > like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had
> movement
> > since October.
> > - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
> (assigned
> > to Shawn): This has a good amount of commits, but the comments seem
> like it
> > isn't done yet?
> > I think this is the only thing we can't drop from this release, since
> > there is already a good amount of work done in the 9.2 line.
> >
> > Shawn, do you still want to move forward with both of these for the 9.2
> > release? If so, do you have a timeline?
> >
> > From this thread:
> >
> > - SOLR-8975, SOLR-10466: Eric, how are these coming along, do you still
> > want to get them in for this release?
> > - Alessandro, how are your issues coming along, do you think they
> should
> > be merged in.a few days? Also do you have links to the JIRAs?
> >
> > If this is all wrapped up, I'll start the release tomorrow.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey everyone,
> >>
> >> I'm planning on cutting the branch today, and seeing what our blockers
> >> look like.
> >>
> >> Once again, please ensure the JIRAs that must make it into 9.2 have the
> >> blocker attribute added.
> >> Otherwise I'm going to move forward in a few days, unless there are
> issues
> >> that we see arise.
> >>
> >> - Houston
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Alessandro Benedetti <
> a.benedetti@sease.io>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I have some issues my team is working on, and we would potentially
> love to
> >>> see them in 9.2 .
> >>> But I don't want to block anything and I suspect they'll get merged by
> the
> >>> end of this week.
> >>>
> >>> Any estimation for the branch cut? So we may potentially include them.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> --------------------------
> >>> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> >>> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> >>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> >>> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
> >>>
> >>> e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> >>> Consulting | Training | Open Source
> >>>
> >>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> >>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> >>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> >>> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 19:08, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow.
> >>> Please
> >>>> do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly.
> >>>>
> >>>> - Houston
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb <an...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> hi Houston,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress
> -
> >>>>> would
> >>>>> like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away
> >>> so
> >>>>> won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the
> >>>>> earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure I'm
> >>>> doing
> >>>>> it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could
> >>> chat
> >>>>> about it then.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> thanks,
> >>>>> Andy
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hey everyone,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How
> >>> are we
> >>>>>> doing with regards to blockers right now?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not
> >>> completed. Do
> >>>>> we
> >>>>>> have updates for these items?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653>
> >>>>>> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>
> >>>>>> - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
> >>>>>> - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681>
> >>>>>> (mentioned
> >>>>>> above)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to
> >>>> block
> >>>>>> 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am
> >>>> leaning
> >>>>>> towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's
> >>>>>> feasible we can move forward without it.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Houston
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step +
> >>> throw a
> >>>>> http
> >>>>>>> 400 error.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jan Høydahl
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mkhl@apache.org
> >>>> :
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hello, colleagues!
> >>>>>>>> How can we triage
> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
> >>>>>>>> Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
> >>>>>>>> I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a
> >>>> known
> >>>>>>>> bug/limitation?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <
> >>>> houston@apache.org>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hey everyone,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a
> >>> ton
> >>>> of
> >>>>>>> great
> >>>>>>>>> things to show off in 9.2:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> - Jetty 10
> >>>>>>>>> - JAX-RS
> >>>>>>>>> - Lucene 9.5
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March
> >>> 6th,
> >>>>>> unless
> >>>>>>>>> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> - Houston
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Sincerely yours
> >>>>>>>> Mikhail Khludnev
> >>>>>>>> https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
> >>>>>>>> A caveat: Cyrillic!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> _______________________
> Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 |
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com <
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <
> http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
> Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <
> https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
>
> This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be
> Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of
> whether attachments are marked as such.
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Eric Pugh <ep...@opensourceconnections.com>.
I am super close on SOLR-10466, barring any issues being raised on review. Going to keep pushing this afternoon to get it to done. Only thirteen more uses of the deprecated method in the test code, and honestly, since we aren’t deleting this method in 9.2, if I don’t get the remaining test converted today, then SOLR-10466 could still be merged. It would be great if folks could review https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1256 <https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1256> and give me a +1/LGTM on the work that I’ve done.
For SOLR-8975, there are two other sub issues that aren’t SOLR010466, and they are not anything that would block 9.2 going out. Issue SOLR-8975 is also kind of an umbrella issue that isn’t tied to 9.2 either.
> On Mar 15, 2023, at 10:58 AM, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> Trying to get organized around the release. From my point of view, this is
> the state of unfinished work:
>
> Looking at the Solr 9.2 blockers (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR/versions/12352353), we
> currently have two:
>
> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>: It looks
> like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had movement
> since October.
> - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> (assigned
> to Shawn): This has a good amount of commits, but the comments seem like it
> isn't done yet?
> I think this is the only thing we can't drop from this release, since
> there is already a good amount of work done in the 9.2 line.
>
> Shawn, do you still want to move forward with both of these for the 9.2
> release? If so, do you have a timeline?
>
> From this thread:
>
> - SOLR-8975, SOLR-10466: Eric, how are these coming along, do you still
> want to get them in for this release?
> - Alessandro, how are your issues coming along, do you think they should
> be merged in.a few days? Also do you have links to the JIRAs?
>
> If this is all wrapped up, I'll start the release tomorrow.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> I'm planning on cutting the branch today, and seeing what our blockers
>> look like.
>>
>> Once again, please ensure the JIRAs that must make it into 9.2 have the
>> blocker attribute added.
>> Otherwise I'm going to move forward in a few days, unless there are issues
>> that we see arise.
>>
>> - Houston
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have some issues my team is working on, and we would potentially love to
>>> see them in 9.2 .
>>> But I don't want to block anything and I suspect they'll get merged by the
>>> end of this week.
>>>
>>> Any estimation for the branch cut? So we may potentially include them.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> --------------------------
>>> *Alessandro Benedetti*
>>> Director @ Sease Ltd.
>>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
>>> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>>>
>>> e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>>>
>>>
>>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
>>> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>>>
>>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
>>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
>>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
>>> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 19:08, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow.
>>> Please
>>>> do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly.
>>>>
>>>> - Houston
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb <an...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi Houston,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress -
>>>>> would
>>>>> like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away
>>> so
>>>>> won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the
>>>>> earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure I'm
>>>> doing
>>>>> it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could
>>> chat
>>>>> about it then.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How
>>> are we
>>>>>> doing with regards to blockers right now?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not
>>> completed. Do
>>>>> we
>>>>>> have updates for these items?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653>
>>>>>> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>
>>>>>> - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
>>>>>> - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681>
>>>>>> (mentioned
>>>>>> above)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to
>>>> block
>>>>>> 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am
>>>> leaning
>>>>>> towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's
>>>>>> feasible we can move forward without it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Houston
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step +
>>> throw a
>>>>> http
>>>>>>> 400 error.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jan Høydahl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mkhl@apache.org
>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello, colleagues!
>>>>>>>> How can we triage
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
>>>>>>>> Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
>>>>>>>> I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a
>>>> known
>>>>>>>> bug/limitation?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <
>>>> houston@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a
>>> ton
>>>> of
>>>>>>> great
>>>>>>>>> things to show off in 9.2:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Jetty 10
>>>>>>>>> - JAX-RS
>>>>>>>>> - Lucene 9.5
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March
>>> 6th,
>>>>>> unless
>>>>>>>>> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Houston
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sincerely yours
>>>>>>>> Mikhail Khludnev
>>>>>>>> https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
>>>>>>>> A caveat: Cyrillic!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
_______________________
Eric Pugh | Founder & CEO | OpenSource Connections, LLC | 434.466.1467 | http://www.opensourceconnections.com <http://www.opensourceconnections.com/> | My Free/Busy <http://tinyurl.com/eric-cal>
Co-Author: Apache Solr Enterprise Search Server, 3rd Ed <https://www.packtpub.com/big-data-and-business-intelligence/apache-solr-enterprise-search-server-third-edition-raw>
This e-mail and all contents, including attachments, is considered to be Company Confidential unless explicitly stated otherwise, regardless of whether attachments are marked as such.
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
Hey everyone,
forgot to send out the Release Notes page earlier.
I added what I thought should be there just now, but will wait for a little
bit in case anyone wants to add anything:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/ReleaseNote9_2_0
- Houston
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 3:33 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder Jan, it is now merged and backported!
>
> - Houston
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 6:51 PM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
>> Remember to merge https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1436
>>
>> I can do it if you wish but it ties in with other changes syncing I guess.
>>
>> Jan Høydahl
>>
>> > 18. mar. 2023 kl. 18:39 skrev Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>:
>> >
>> > On 3/15/23 08:58, Houston Putman wrote:
>> >> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>: It
>> looks like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had
>> movement since October. - SOLR-8803 <
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> (assigned to Shawn):
>> This has a good amount of commits, but the comments seem like it isn't done
>> yet? I think this is the only thing we can't drop from this release, since
>> there is already a good amount of work done in the 9.2 line.
>> >
>> > Apologies for the delay here. I've had a crazy few days at work.
>> >
>> > 9168 hasn't had any work done, it shouldn't hold up this release. I
>> would like to do this, just haven't had time.
>> >
>> > 8803 is done, except for any possible fallout in the docker image. I
>> was looking at the docker stuff in the reference guide, and it talks about
>> using an OOM environment variable to change how OOM is handled.
>> >
>> > I can find no evidence in the docker build stuff that OOM is ever
>> checked, so I think the docs are probably wrong.
>> >
>> > I did verify that the commandline changes done for 8803 ARE present
>> when running the docker image.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Shawn
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
Thanks for the reminder Jan, it is now merged and backported!
- Houston
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 6:51 PM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
> Remember to merge https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1436
>
> I can do it if you wish but it ties in with other changes syncing I guess.
>
> Jan Høydahl
>
> > 18. mar. 2023 kl. 18:39 skrev Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>:
> >
> > On 3/15/23 08:58, Houston Putman wrote:
> >> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>: It
> looks like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had
> movement since October. - SOLR-8803 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> (assigned to Shawn):
> This has a good amount of commits, but the comments seem like it isn't done
> yet? I think this is the only thing we can't drop from this release, since
> there is already a good amount of work done in the 9.2 line.
> >
> > Apologies for the delay here. I've had a crazy few days at work.
> >
> > 9168 hasn't had any work done, it shouldn't hold up this release. I
> would like to do this, just haven't had time.
> >
> > 8803 is done, except for any possible fallout in the docker image. I
> was looking at the docker stuff in the reference guide, and it talks about
> using an OOM environment variable to change how OOM is handled.
> >
> > I can find no evidence in the docker build stuff that OOM is ever
> checked, so I think the docs are probably wrong.
> >
> > I did verify that the commandline changes done for 8803 ARE present when
> running the docker image.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shawn
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>.
Remember to merge https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1436
I can do it if you wish but it ties in with other changes syncing I guess.
Jan Høydahl
> 18. mar. 2023 kl. 18:39 skrev Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>:
>
> On 3/15/23 08:58, Houston Putman wrote:
>> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>: It looks like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had movement since October. - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> (assigned to Shawn): This has a good amount of commits, but the comments seem like it isn't done yet? I think this is the only thing we can't drop from this release, since there is already a good amount of work done in the 9.2 line.
>
> Apologies for the delay here. I've had a crazy few days at work.
>
> 9168 hasn't had any work done, it shouldn't hold up this release. I would like to do this, just haven't had time.
>
> 8803 is done, except for any possible fallout in the docker image. I was looking at the docker stuff in the reference guide, and it talks about using an OOM environment variable to change how OOM is handled.
>
> I can find no evidence in the docker build stuff that OOM is ever checked, so I think the docs are probably wrong.
>
> I did verify that the commandline changes done for 8803 ARE present when running the docker image.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Shawn Heisey <ap...@elyograg.org>.
On 3/15/23 08:58, Houston Putman wrote:
> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>: It looks
> like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had
> movement since October. - SOLR-8803
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> (assigned to Shawn):
> This has a good amount of commits, but the comments seem like it isn't
> done yet? I think this is the only thing we can't drop from this
> release, since there is already a good amount of work done in the 9.2 line.
Apologies for the delay here. I've had a crazy few days at work.
9168 hasn't had any work done, it shouldn't hold up this release. I
would like to do this, just haven't had time.
8803 is done, except for any possible fallout in the docker image. I
was looking at the docker stuff in the reference guide, and it talks
about using an OOM environment variable to change how OOM is handled.
I can find no evidence in the docker build stuff that OOM is ever
checked, so I think the docs are probably wrong.
I did verify that the commandline changes done for 8803 ARE present when
running the docker image.
Thanks,
Shawn
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
Hey everyone,
Trying to get organized around the release. From my point of view, this is
the state of unfinished work:
Looking at the Solr 9.2 blockers (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/SOLR/versions/12352353), we
currently have two:
- SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>: It looks
like this has a patch, that was +1'ed by Kevin, but it hasn't had movement
since October.
- SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803> (assigned
to Shawn): This has a good amount of commits, but the comments seem like it
isn't done yet?
I think this is the only thing we can't drop from this release, since
there is already a good amount of work done in the 9.2 line.
Shawn, do you still want to move forward with both of these for the 9.2
release? If so, do you have a timeline?
From this thread:
- SOLR-8975, SOLR-10466: Eric, how are these coming along, do you still
want to get them in for this release?
- Alessandro, how are your issues coming along, do you think they should
be merged in.a few days? Also do you have links to the JIRAs?
If this is all wrapped up, I'll start the release tomorrow.
- Houston
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:02 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm planning on cutting the branch today, and seeing what our blockers
> look like.
>
> Once again, please ensure the JIRAs that must make it into 9.2 have the
> blocker attribute added.
> Otherwise I'm going to move forward in a few days, unless there are issues
> that we see arise.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>
> wrote:
>
>> I have some issues my team is working on, and we would potentially love to
>> see them in 9.2 .
>> But I don't want to block anything and I suspect they'll get merged by the
>> end of this week.
>>
>> Any estimation for the branch cut? So we may potentially include them.
>>
>> Cheers
>> --------------------------
>> *Alessandro Benedetti*
>> Director @ Sease Ltd.
>> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
>> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>>
>> e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>>
>>
>> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
>> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>>
>> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
>> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
>> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
>> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 19:08, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow.
>> Please
>> > do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly.
>> >
>> > - Houston
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb <an...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > hi Houston,
>> > >
>> > > I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress -
>> > > would
>> > > like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away
>> so
>> > > won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the
>> > > earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure I'm
>> > doing
>> > > it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could
>> chat
>> > > about it then.
>> > >
>> > > thanks,
>> > > Andy
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hey everyone,
>> > > >
>> > > > I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How
>> are we
>> > > > doing with regards to blockers right now?
>> > > >
>> > > > So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not
>> completed. Do
>> > > we
>> > > > have updates for these items?
>> > > >
>> > > > - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653>
>> > > > - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>
>> > > > - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
>> > > > - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681>
>> > > > (mentioned
>> > > > above)
>> > > >
>> > > > I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to
>> > block
>> > > > 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am
>> > leaning
>> > > > towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's
>> > > > feasible we can move forward without it.
>> > > >
>> > > > - Houston
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step +
>> throw a
>> > > http
>> > > > > 400 error.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Jan Høydahl
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mkhl@apache.org
>> >:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hello, colleagues!
>> > > > > > How can we triage
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
>> > > > > > Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
>> > > > > > I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a
>> > known
>> > > > > > bug/limitation?
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <
>> > houston@apache.org>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Hey everyone,
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a
>> ton
>> > of
>> > > > > great
>> > > > > >> things to show off in 9.2:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> - Jetty 10
>> > > > > >> - JAX-RS
>> > > > > >> - Lucene 9.5
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March
>> 6th,
>> > > > unless
>> > > > > >> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> - Houston
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --
>> > > > > > Sincerely yours
>> > > > > > Mikhail Khludnev
>> > > > > > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
>> > > > > > A caveat: Cyrillic!
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
Hey everyone,
I'm planning on cutting the branch today, and seeing what our blockers look
like.
Once again, please ensure the JIRAs that must make it into 9.2 have the
blocker attribute added.
Otherwise I'm going to move forward in a few days, unless there are issues
that we see arise.
- Houston
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 1:06 PM Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>
wrote:
> I have some issues my team is working on, and we would potentially love to
> see them in 9.2 .
> But I don't want to block anything and I suspect they'll get merged by the
> end of this week.
>
> Any estimation for the branch cut? So we may potentially include them.
>
> Cheers
> --------------------------
> *Alessandro Benedetti*
> Director @ Sease Ltd.
> *Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
> *Apache Solr PMC Member*
>
> e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
>
>
> *Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
> Consulting | Training | Open Source
>
> Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
> LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
> <https://github.com/seaseltd>
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 19:08, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow.
> Please
> > do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > hi Houston,
> > >
> > > I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress -
> > > would
> > > like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away
> so
> > > won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the
> > > earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure I'm
> > doing
> > > it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could
> chat
> > > about it then.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey everyone,
> > > >
> > > > I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are
> we
> > > > doing with regards to blockers right now?
> > > >
> > > > So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not completed.
> Do
> > > we
> > > > have updates for these items?
> > > >
> > > > - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653>
> > > > - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>
> > > > - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
> > > > - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681>
> > > > (mentioned
> > > > above)
> > > >
> > > > I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to
> > block
> > > > 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am
> > leaning
> > > > towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's
> > > > feasible we can move forward without it.
> > > >
> > > > - Houston
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + throw
> a
> > > http
> > > > > 400 error.
> > > > >
> > > > > Jan Høydahl
> > > > >
> > > > > > 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mk...@apache.org>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello, colleagues!
> > > > > > How can we triage
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
> > > > > > Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
> > > > > > I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a
> > known
> > > > > > bug/limitation?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <
> > houston@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Hey everyone,
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton
> > of
> > > > > great
> > > > > >> things to show off in 9.2:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> - Jetty 10
> > > > > >> - JAX-RS
> > > > > >> - Lucene 9.5
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th,
> > > > unless
> > > > > >> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> - Houston
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Sincerely yours
> > > > > > Mikhail Khludnev
> > > > > > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
> > > > > > A caveat: Cyrillic!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Alessandro Benedetti <a....@sease.io>.
I have some issues my team is working on, and we would potentially love to
see them in 9.2 .
But I don't want to block anything and I suspect they'll get merged by the
end of this week.
Any estimation for the branch cut? So we may potentially include them.
Cheers
--------------------------
*Alessandro Benedetti*
Director @ Sease Ltd.
*Apache Lucene/Solr Committer*
*Apache Solr PMC Member*
e-mail: a.benedetti@sease.io
*Sease* - Information Retrieval Applied
Consulting | Training | Open Source
Website: Sease.io <http://sease.io/>
LinkedIn <https://linkedin.com/company/sease-ltd> | Twitter
<https://twitter.com/seaseltd> | Youtube
<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCDx86ZKLYNpI3gzMercM7BQ> | Github
<https://github.com/seaseltd>
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 19:08, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow. Please
> do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > hi Houston,
> >
> > I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress -
> > would
> > like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away so
> > won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the
> > earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure I'm
> doing
> > it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could chat
> > about it then.
> >
> > thanks,
> > Andy
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey everyone,
> > >
> > > I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we
> > > doing with regards to blockers right now?
> > >
> > > So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not completed. Do
> > we
> > > have updates for these items?
> > >
> > > - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653>
> > > - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>
> > > - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
> > > - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681>
> > > (mentioned
> > > above)
> > >
> > > I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to
> block
> > > 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am
> leaning
> > > towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's
> > > feasible we can move forward without it.
> > >
> > > - Houston
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + throw a
> > http
> > > > 400 error.
> > > >
> > > > Jan Høydahl
> > > >
> > > > > 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mk...@apache.org>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hello, colleagues!
> > > > > How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
> > > > > Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
> > > > > I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a
> known
> > > > > bug/limitation?
> > > > >
> > > > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <
> houston@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Hey everyone,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton
> of
> > > > great
> > > > >> things to show off in 9.2:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - Jetty 10
> > > > >> - JAX-RS
> > > > >> - Lucene 9.5
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th,
> > > unless
> > > > >> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> - Houston
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Sincerely yours
> > > > > Mikhail Khludnev
> > > > > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
> > > > > A caveat: Cyrillic!
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
I'll cut the branch in a few days, so go for it and merge tomorrow. Please
do add 9.2 as the Fix Version so that we can track this correctly.
- Houston
On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 1:06 PM Andy Webb <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> hi Houston,
>
> I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress -
> would
> like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away so
> won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the
> earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure I'm doing
> it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could chat
> about it then.
>
> thanks,
> Andy
>
>
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we
> > doing with regards to blockers right now?
> >
> > So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not completed. Do
> we
> > have updates for these items?
> >
> > - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653>
> > - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>
> > - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
> > - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681>
> > (mentioned
> > above)
> >
> > I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to block
> > 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am leaning
> > towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's
> > feasible we can move forward without it.
> >
> > - Houston
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + throw a
> http
> > > 400 error.
> > >
> > > Jan Høydahl
> > >
> > > > 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mk...@apache.org>:
> > > >
> > > > Hello, colleagues!
> > > > How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
> > > > Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
> > > > I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a known
> > > > bug/limitation?
> > > >
> > > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Hey everyone,
> > > >>
> > > >> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of
> > > great
> > > >> things to show off in 9.2:
> > > >>
> > > >> - Jetty 10
> > > >> - JAX-RS
> > > >> - Lucene 9.5
> > > >>
> > > >> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th,
> > unless
> > > >> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
> > > >>
> > > >> - Houston
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Sincerely yours
> > > > Mikhail Khludnev
> > > > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
> > > > A caveat: Cyrillic!
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Andy Webb <an...@gmail.com>.
hi Houston,
I have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16643 in progress - would
like that to go into 9.2 if possible, but it's not critical. I'm away so
won't be in a position to merge that until this time tomorrow at the
earliest. It'll also be my first commit, and I want to make sure I'm doing
it right! I'm intending to join the Meetup to say hi to folk, could chat
about it then.
thanks,
Andy
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 15:18, Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we
> doing with regards to blockers right now?
>
> So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not completed. Do we
> have updates for these items?
>
> - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653>
> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>
> - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
> - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681>
> (mentioned
> above)
>
> I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to block
> 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am leaning
> towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's
> feasible we can move forward without it.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> > I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + throw a http
> > 400 error.
> >
> > Jan Høydahl
> >
> > > 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mk...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > Hello, colleagues!
> > > How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
> > > Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
> > > I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a known
> > > bug/limitation?
> > >
> > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hey everyone,
> > >>
> > >> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of
> > great
> > >> things to show off in 9.2:
> > >>
> > >> - Jetty 10
> > >> - JAX-RS
> > >> - Lucene 9.5
> > >>
> > >> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th,
> unless
> > >> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
> > >>
> > >> - Houston
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sincerely yours
> > > Mikhail Khludnev
> > > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
> > > A caveat: Cyrillic!
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ic...@gmail.com>.
Hi Houston,
We're actively working on SOLR-16653. Since it is a bug fix, hoping it
won't delay the release. +1 to branch cutting.
Regards,
Ishan
On Tue, 7 Mar, 2023, 8:48 pm Houston Putman, <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we
> doing with regards to blockers right now?
>
> So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not completed. Do we
> have updates for these items?
>
> - SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653>
> - SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>
> - SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
> - SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681>
> (mentioned
> above)
>
> I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to block
> 9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am leaning
> towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's
> feasible we can move forward without it.
>
> - Houston
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
> > I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + throw a http
> > 400 error.
> >
> > Jan Høydahl
> >
> > > 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mk...@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > Hello, colleagues!
> > > How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
> > > Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
> > > I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a known
> > > bug/limitation?
> > >
> > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hey everyone,
> > >>
> > >> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of
> > great
> > >> things to show off in 9.2:
> > >>
> > >> - Jetty 10
> > >> - JAX-RS
> > >> - Lucene 9.5
> > >>
> > >> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th,
> unless
> > >> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
> > >>
> > >> - Houston
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sincerely yours
> > > Mikhail Khludnev
> > > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
> > > A caveat: Cyrillic!
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>.
Hey everyone,
I am officially back and ready to begin the process for 9.2. How are we
doing with regards to blockers right now?
So I see 4 tickets that are tagged to 9.2 in JIRA but not completed. Do we
have updates for these items?
- SOLR-16653 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16653>
- SOLR-9168 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9168>
- SOLR-8803 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8803>
- SOLR-16681 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681> (mentioned
above)
I also see work going on for the Lucene 9.5 upgrade. Do we want to block
9.2 on this upgrade, or do we want to wait for 9.3? I think I am leaning
towards including Lucene 9.5 in Solr 9.2, but if we don't think it's
feasible we can move forward without it.
- Houston
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 3:49 AM Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
> I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + throw a http
> 400 error.
>
> Jan Høydahl
>
> > 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mk...@apache.org>:
> >
> > Hello, colleagues!
> > How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
> > Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
> > I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a known
> > bug/limitation?
> >
> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey everyone,
> >>
> >> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of
> great
> >> things to show off in 9.2:
> >>
> >> - Jetty 10
> >> - JAX-RS
> >> - Lucene 9.5
> >>
> >> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th, unless
> >> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
> >>
> >> - Houston
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sincerely yours
> > Mikhail Khludnev
> > https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
> > A caveat: Cyrillic!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Solr 9.2 Release
Posted by Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>.
I’m ok with documenting it as a limitation as a first step + throw a http 400 error.
Jan Høydahl
> 1. mar. 2023 kl. 08:21 skrev Mikhail Khludnev <mk...@apache.org>:
>
> Hello, colleagues!
> How can we triage https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-16681
> Replacing uniqueKey field via fl doesn't work since 9.0?
> I don't have an elegant solution. Will we just declare it as a known
> bug/limitation?
>
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 9:07 PM Houston Putman <ho...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hey everyone,
>>
>> It's been a while since Solr 9.1 was released, and we have a ton of great
>> things to show off in 9.2:
>>
>> - Jetty 10
>> - JAX-RS
>> - Lucene 9.5
>>
>> I volunteer to do the release starting in the week of March 6th, unless
>> anyone else objects or wants to do it themselves.
>>
>> - Houston
>>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail Khludnev
> https://t.me/MUST_SEARCH
> A caveat: Cyrillic!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@solr.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@solr.apache.org