You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@nutch.apache.org by "Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/10/03 21:48:19 UTC

[jira] Created: (NUTCH-378) MetaWrapper decorator

MetaWrapper decorator
---------------------

                 Key: NUTCH-378
                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-378
             Project: Nutch
          Issue Type: Improvement
    Affects Versions: 0.9.0
            Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki 
         Assigned To: Andrzej Bialecki 
         Attachments: MetaWrapper.java

First, a bit of background.

Currently some tools (Indexer, SegmentMerger, CrawlDbReducer) use ObjectWritable to pass data from different parts of segment(s) to map-reduce methods. However, there is a high risk that this data is processed incorrectly, because map-reduce methods no longer know the exact source of any given data item.

Example: Indexer may process many segments at the same time. In its reduce() method it receives a set of values coming from different parts of the segment, but found at the same key (url). However, if the same page is fetched multiple times, Indexer will receive multiple sets of values from different segments (e.g. multiple fetchDatum, parseData, etc). It may happen that some of this data items it picks up for further processing belong to one set, and some other data to another, resulting in the final set that is a hodge-podge of partial data coming from different segments. This could be avoided if each value had metadata to mark it as belonging to a particular segment. Indexer could then collect all complete multiple sets, and then select the most recent one for further processing.

Similar situation occurs in SegmentMerger, where data coming from different segments is tagged with its source. However, ParseText class doesn't support any metadata, so its text has to be changed to contain the tag. This is unwieldy and far from elegant.

A different problem occurs in CrawlDbReducer - we have instances of the same class, but it's sometimes difficult to determine where they originally came from. This also limits us to update CrawlDb from 1 segment at a time, otherwise CrawlDatum instances from earlier segments would be indistinguishable from those from newer segments... In short, the functionality and internal logic here could be vastly improved if we knew where any CrawlDatum instance came from.

The attached class provides this functionality - instead of using ObjectWritable (or plain CrawlDatum) we can wrap instances of input data in MetaWritable, and add necessary metadata that will support the processing at hand. Then in map-reduce methods we can unpack original values, and use additional metadata.

Note: this wrapping/unwrapping is aplied only during map-reduce jobs - data stored in DBs and segments would remain the same.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

[jira] Updated: (NUTCH-378) MetaWrapper decorator

Posted by "Andrzej Bialecki (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-378?page=all ]

Andrzej Bialecki  updated NUTCH-378:
------------------------------------

    Attachment: MetaWrapper.java

> MetaWrapper decorator
> ---------------------
>
>                 Key: NUTCH-378
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-378
>             Project: Nutch
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.9.0
>            Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki 
>         Assigned To: Andrzej Bialecki 
>         Attachments: MetaWrapper.java
>
>
> First, a bit of background.
> Currently some tools (Indexer, SegmentMerger, CrawlDbReducer) use ObjectWritable to pass data from different parts of segment(s) to map-reduce methods. However, there is a high risk that this data is processed incorrectly, because map-reduce methods no longer know the exact source of any given data item.
> Example: Indexer may process many segments at the same time. In its reduce() method it receives a set of values coming from different parts of the segment, but found at the same key (url). However, if the same page is fetched multiple times, Indexer will receive multiple sets of values from different segments (e.g. multiple fetchDatum, parseData, etc). It may happen that some of this data items it picks up for further processing belong to one set, and some other data to another, resulting in the final set that is a hodge-podge of partial data coming from different segments. This could be avoided if each value had metadata to mark it as belonging to a particular segment. Indexer could then collect all complete multiple sets, and then select the most recent one for further processing.
> Similar situation occurs in SegmentMerger, where data coming from different segments is tagged with its source. However, ParseText class doesn't support any metadata, so its text has to be changed to contain the tag. This is unwieldy and far from elegant.
> A different problem occurs in CrawlDbReducer - we have instances of the same class, but it's sometimes difficult to determine where they originally came from. This also limits us to update CrawlDb from 1 segment at a time, otherwise CrawlDatum instances from earlier segments would be indistinguishable from those from newer segments... In short, the functionality and internal logic here could be vastly improved if we knew where any CrawlDatum instance came from.
> The attached class provides this functionality - instead of using ObjectWritable (or plain CrawlDatum) we can wrap instances of input data in MetaWritable, and add necessary metadata that will support the processing at hand. Then in map-reduce methods we can unpack original values, and use additional metadata.
> Note: this wrapping/unwrapping is aplied only during map-reduce jobs - data stored in DBs and segments would remain the same.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira