You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com> on 2008/03/17 08:55:01 UTC
CI for Maven
Hi all,
I noticed that archiva and continuum are now building on vmbuild
instead of maven.zone. I think it is to have a better stability. Can't
we move others build o it (plugins, core ...). Or perhaps on hudson @
Sonatype. I don't know what is the best.
Arnaud
--
..........................................................
Arnaud HERITIER
..........................................................
OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
..........................................................
ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
...........................................................
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
RE: CI for Maven
Posted by "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>.
Continuum was running it for a while, but it kept going down (admittedly
it was possibly a system problem). Every time I tried to find out the
results of a test, someone had to go kick it first because it wasn't
running. This was an ongoing problem for a long time and no one
apparently had the time to fix it for good. It was finally causing me
enough pain with the 2.0.9 release that I needed to do something. I'm
familiar with and prefer Hudson so it was a natural choice for me to use
if I'm putting in the time to set it up and maintain it.
Continuum is its own TLP now but Apache also runs Hudson instances
(http://hudson.zones.apache.org). The apache Hudson instance is
overloaded but Sonatype donated a machine with Hudson on it for us to
use. Just because a project is an Apache one doesn't mean we're required
to use it. Hudson has been running flawlessly so far, so what's the
harm? IMO, what's important is that Maven gets the service it needs and
right now Hudson is working for what we need.
If the project decides they want to use Continuum and someone volunteers
to set it up, keep it maintained and it's providing the service we need,
great. I could really care less what system executes our builds and
sends me emails as long as I can trust that it's always running and
providing accurate results. Unfortunately that wasn't the case in the
recent past.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jochen Wiedmann [mailto:jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 11:32 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: CI for Maven
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Brian E. Fox <br...@reply.infinity.nu>
wrote:
> ci.sonatype.org for now. It is what I'm relying on while doing the
2.0.9
> release. Neither of the CI systems are currently publishing snapshots
to
> the official apache repo due to various infrastructure issues we'll
work
> out soon.
This may already be answered before, in which case I apologize for the
noise. However, why aren't we eating our own dog food (aka Continuum)?
Thanks,
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: CI for Maven
Posted by Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Brian E. Fox <br...@reply.infinity.nu> wrote:
> ci.sonatype.org for now. It is what I'm relying on while doing the 2.0.9
> release. Neither of the CI systems are currently publishing snapshots to
> the official apache repo due to various infrastructure issues we'll work
> out soon.
This may already be answered before, in which case I apologize for the
noise. However, why aren't we eating our own dog food (aka Continuum)?
Thanks,
Jochen
--
Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before
you break 'em.
-- (Terry Pratchett, Thief of Time)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
RE: CI for Maven
Posted by "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>.
ci.sonatype.org for now. It is what I'm relying on while doing the 2.0.9
release. Neither of the CI systems are currently publishing snapshots to
the official apache repo due to various infrastructure issues we'll work
out soon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Siarhei Dudzin [mailto:siarhei.dudzin@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 8:45 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: Re: CI for Maven
So what's going to be the major CI server for Maven?
Regards,
Siahrei
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Brian E. Fox <br...@reply.infinity.nu>
wrote:
> My plan is to move the rest of the stuff over to Hudson this week.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aheritier@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:55 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: CI for Maven
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that archiva and continuum are now building on vmbuild
> instead of maven.zone. I think it is to have a better stability. Can't
> we move others build o it (plugins, core ...). Or perhaps on hudson @
> Sonatype. I don't know what is the best.
>
> Arnaud
>
> --
> ..........................................................
> Arnaud HERITIER
> ..........................................................
> OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> ..........................................................
> ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> ...........................................................
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: CI for Maven
Posted by Siarhei Dudzin <si...@gmail.com>.
So what's going to be the major CI server for Maven?
Regards,
Siahrei
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 1:30 PM, Brian E. Fox <br...@reply.infinity.nu>
wrote:
> My plan is to move the rest of the stuff over to Hudson this week.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aheritier@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:55 AM
> To: Maven Developers List
> Subject: CI for Maven
>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that archiva and continuum are now building on vmbuild
> instead of maven.zone. I think it is to have a better stability. Can't
> we move others build o it (plugins, core ...). Or perhaps on hudson @
> Sonatype. I don't know what is the best.
>
> Arnaud
>
> --
> ..........................................................
> Arnaud HERITIER
> ..........................................................
> OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> ..........................................................
> ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> ...........................................................
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
RE: CI for Maven
Posted by "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>.
My plan is to move the rest of the stuff over to Hudson this week.
-----Original Message-----
From: Arnaud HERITIER [mailto:aheritier@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:55 AM
To: Maven Developers List
Subject: CI for Maven
Hi all,
I noticed that archiva and continuum are now building on vmbuild
instead of maven.zone. I think it is to have a better stability. Can't
we move others build o it (plugins, core ...). Or perhaps on hudson @
Sonatype. I don't know what is the best.
Arnaud
--
..........................................................
Arnaud HERITIER
..........................................................
OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
..........................................................
ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
...........................................................
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org