[jira] [Comment Edited] (LUCENE-9819) Look into TestKnnGraph random failures

["Michael Sokolov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17293062#comment-17293062 ] 

Michael Sokolov edited comment on LUCENE-9819 at 3/1/21, 7:25 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks [~rcmuir], I had problems with this test during development, but I thought it had landed in a reliable zone. It's challenging to unit test this search functionality since it is inherently random. I suppose we could just convert the test to use a fixed random seed for the graph construction and knn search. Then at least we would test the remainder of the algorithm. Or maybe there is a bug! Anyway I'll look into it


was (Author: sokolov):
Thanks [~rcmuir], I had problems with this test during development, but I thought it had landed in a reliable zone. It's challenging to unit test this search functionality since it is inherently random. I suppose we could just convert the test to use a fixed random seed for the graph construction and knn search. Then at least we would test the remainder of the algorithm

> Look into TestKnnGraph random failures
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-9819
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-9819
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>            Priority: Major
>
> If you apply enough pressure to this test it will provoke failures. Let's beast it from some specific git hash and figure out what is happening.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org