[RESULT] Re: [vote] PMC to accept DayTrader contribution and/or/not create "application" subproject

["Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>]

Accept DayTrader :

+1 from geir, dain, joe, alan, david, sachin, dims, john, gianny, david

So let it be noted that the DayTrader contribution was accepted.


For the App subproject :

+1 from geir, joe, dims
-1 from everyone else

So noted that this isn't happening now.

geir


On Sep 20, 2005, at 12:13 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> There has been little comment or complaint about the "DayTrader"  
> contribution GERONIMO-1016.
>
> I have done a cursory review and committed the code minus the  
> binary code (.class and .ear) into trunk/sandbox.  I did this as a  
> courtesy to Matt so he can keep working and submitting patches for  
> now.  (Matt, get rid of the App.java stuff that seem to be maven  
> detritus..)
>
> For efficiency, I'd like to vote on two things.
>
> First, whether or not to accept.  All votes welcome, PMC votes  
> binding :
>
> [ ] +1  Accept the DayTrader donation into the project
> [ ] -1  Do not accept DayTrader donation into the project
>
>
> Second, we now have a collection of samples, applications and  
> such.  I think that it would help keep the trunk clear if we  
> started an Applications subproject (peer with DevTools) and move  
> everything like it there.
>
> [ ] +1 Create an Applications subproject (to which Apache Geronimo
>        subproject rules apply) and move DayTrader (if accepted)
>        with other relevant codebases into it
> [ ] -1 Do not create Applications subproject.  Leave in trunk.
>
>
> I'm happy for people to pose alternatives if there are good ones -  
> I just didn't see any on the threads so far.
>
> geir
>
> -- 
> Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
> geirm@apache.org
>
>
>

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org