Does OJB need internal tables?

[Robert Krueger <kr...@signal7.de>]

Hi,

I'm currently in the early stages of evaluating OJB as a CMP-EJB alternative 
for a project of ours.

I've browsed through the docs and came across the internal tables used for 
sequences and collections. Is it possible to run OJB without these tables 
being present provided that we restrict ourselves to certain features or are 
those absolutely necessary (btw we don't need sequences and want to use 
optimistic concurrency based on timestamps). I didn't find this piece of 
information in the docs.

Thanks in advance,

Robert






     

Re: Does OJB need internal tables?

[Robert Krueger <kr...@signal7.de>]

Thanks, that's great! We're planning on using the PB-API anyway. 

The platforms document explained the rest, I missed that. Maybe it would be 
helpful to add a link to the platforms page on the page repository.html as 
that's were I stumbled across the internal tables looking for information on 
how to deploy OJB.

Thanks again. I can't wait to get this thing running as it looks very 
promising.

Best regards,

Robert 

On Saturday 08 March 2003 15:08, Armin Waibel wrote:
> Hi Robert,

>
> In short, using the PB-api you don't need any internal tables.
> Using ODMG without internal tables is a little more difficult
> - see
> http://db.apache.org/ojb/platforms.html
>
> regards,
> Armin
>
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> > Robert
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org

Re: Does OJB need internal tables?

[Armin Waibel <ar...@code-au-lait.de>]

Hi Robert,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Krueger" <kr...@signal7.de>
To: <oj...@db.apache.org>
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 2:55 PM
Subject: Does OJB need internal tables?


>
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently in the early stages of evaluating OJB as a CMP-EJB
alternative
> for a project of ours.
>
> I've browsed through the docs and came across the internal tables used
for
> sequences and collections. Is it possible to run OJB without these
tables
> being present provided that we restrict ourselves to certain features
or are
> those absolutely necessary (btw we don't need sequences and want to
use
> optimistic concurrency based on timestamps). I didn't find this piece
of
> information in the docs.

In short, using the PB-api you don't need any internal tables.
Using ODMG without internal tables is a little more difficult
- see
http://db.apache.org/ojb/platforms.html

regards,
Armin

>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: ojb-user-unsubscribe@db.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: ojb-user-help@db.apache.org
>
>
>