[jira] [Commented] (CASSANDRA-11451) Don't mark sstables as repairing when doing sub range repair

["Marcus Eriksson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15216650#comment-15216650 ] 

Marcus Eriksson commented on CASSANDRA-11451:
---------------------------------------------

and a dtest: https://github.com/krummas/cassandra-dtest/commits/marcuse/11451 (tests above were run against this branch)

> Don't mark sstables as repairing when doing sub range repair
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-11451
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-11451
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Marcus Eriksson
>            Assignee: Marcus Eriksson
>             Fix For: 2.2.x, 3.0.x, 3.x
>
>
> Since CASSANDRA-10422 we don't do anticompaction when a user issues a sub range repair (-st X -et Y), but we still mark sstables as repairing.
> We should avoid marking them as users might want to run many sub range repair sessions in parallel. 
> The reason we mark sstables is that we don't want another repair session to steal the sstables before we do anticompaction, and since we do no anticompaction with sub range repair we have no benefit from the marking.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)