You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Natalya Smirnov <Na...@reuters.com> on 2004/11/15 15:31:11 UTC
svn versus cvs
I plan to switch to either svn or cvs. What would you recommend? What is
more convenient and faster?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit our Internet site at http://www.reuters.com
Get closer to the financial markets with Reuters Messaging - for more
information and to register, visit http://www.reuters.com/messaging
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
the views of Reuters Ltd.
Re: svn versus cvs
Posted by Dave Neary <da...@phenix.fr>.
Hi Natalya,
Natalya Smirnov wrote:
> I plan to switch to either svn or cvs. What would you recommend? What is
> more convenient and faster?
If you are switching, then svn is definitely a better choice. Subversion
was designed to replace CVS, and it overcomes many architectural
limitations of CVS and adds a number of important functionalities.
The Subversion front page lists several of these:
http://subversion.tigris.org/
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Neary
Phenix Engineering
110 ave Jean Jaures, 69007 Lyon
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org