You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@pulsar.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/05/26 16:21:17 UTC
[GitHub] [pulsar] gaoran10 opened a new pull request #10716: Support using AutoProduceBytesSchema as the function output schema
gaoran10 opened a new pull request #10716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/10716
### Motivation
*Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is the problem you're trying to solve.*
### Modifications
*Describe the modifications you've done.*
### Verifying this change
- [ ] Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.
*(Please pick either of the following options)*
This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.
*(or)*
This change is already covered by existing tests, such as *(please describe tests)*.
*(or)*
This change added tests and can be verified as follows:
*(example:)*
- *Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)*
- *Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure*
### Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:
*If `yes` was chosen, please highlight the changes*
- Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
- The public API: (yes / no)
- The schema: (yes / no / don't know)
- The default values of configurations: (yes / no)
- The wire protocol: (yes / no)
- The rest endpoints: (yes / no)
- The admin cli options: (yes / no)
- Anything that affects deployment: (yes / no / don't know)
### Documentation
- Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
- If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
- If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
- If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [pulsar] eolivelli commented on pull request #10716: Support using AutoProduceBytesSchema as the function output schema
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
eolivelli commented on pull request #10716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/10716#issuecomment-849367491
great stuff.
I am happy than now with have msg.getReaderSchema() and we can do this kind of processing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [pulsar] eolivelli commented on pull request #10716: Support using AutoProduceBytesSchema as the function output schema
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
eolivelli commented on pull request #10716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/10716#issuecomment-849452285
Do we have to add some docs ? (in a follow up PR)
I did the same for Sink<GenericObject> and for Source<byte[]> and AutoProduceBytes
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [pulsar] codelipenghui merged pull request #10716: Support using AutoProduceBytesSchema as the function output schema
Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
codelipenghui merged pull request #10716:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/10716
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org