You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> on 2011/12/06 13:21:30 UTC
[digester] providing additional shaded artifact
Hi all guys,
to complete DIGESTER-153 we had to include CGLIB as new dependency,
actually I would like to experiment distributing an *additional*
artifact (jar) where dependencies are shaded - maybe also renamed for
internal use only.
Note that I don't want to replace the existing distribution, I just
would like to add another jar - users could chose to use it instead.
That wouldn't be the first time that a commons component would
distribute more than one artifact anyway, [beanutils] already does
(even if not shading dependencies)
Do you see potential legal/technical issues?
TIA,
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [digester] providing additional shaded artifact
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
indeed, all dependencies are ASL licensed and the CGLIB inclusion
issue was already faced by Google when repackaging CGLIB inside
google-guice (ASL2 licensed)
I'll update the notice file ASAP
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The copy of cglib source I have locally includes an AL2.
>
> Matt
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:35 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6 December 2011 12:21, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all guys,
>>> to complete DIGESTER-153 we had to include CGLIB as new dependency,
>>> actually I would like to experiment distributing an *additional*
>>> artifact (jar) where dependencies are shaded - maybe also renamed for
>>> internal use only.
>>> Note that I don't want to replace the existing distribution, I just
>>> would like to add another jar - users could chose to use it instead.
>>> That wouldn't be the first time that a commons component would
>>> distribute more than one artifact anyway, [beanutils] already does
>>> (even if not shading dependencies)
>>> Do you see potential legal/technical issues?
>>
>> Legally this depends on the jar licence.
>> As the jar is currently unknown (to me), I would say it is a legal issue.
>>
>>> TIA,
>>> -Simo
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [digester] providing additional shaded artifact
Posted by Matt Benson <gu...@gmail.com>.
The copy of cglib source I have locally includes an AL2.
Matt
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 5:35 PM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 December 2011 12:21, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> to complete DIGESTER-153 we had to include CGLIB as new dependency,
>> actually I would like to experiment distributing an *additional*
>> artifact (jar) where dependencies are shaded - maybe also renamed for
>> internal use only.
>> Note that I don't want to replace the existing distribution, I just
>> would like to add another jar - users could chose to use it instead.
>> That wouldn't be the first time that a commons component would
>> distribute more than one artifact anyway, [beanutils] already does
>> (even if not shading dependencies)
>> Do you see potential legal/technical issues?
>
> Legally this depends on the jar licence.
> As the jar is currently unknown (to me), I would say it is a legal issue.
>
>> TIA,
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [digester] providing additional shaded artifact
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 6 December 2011 12:21, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> to complete DIGESTER-153 we had to include CGLIB as new dependency,
> actually I would like to experiment distributing an *additional*
> artifact (jar) where dependencies are shaded - maybe also renamed for
> internal use only.
> Note that I don't want to replace the existing distribution, I just
> would like to add another jar - users could chose to use it instead.
> That wouldn't be the first time that a commons component would
> distribute more than one artifact anyway, [beanutils] already does
> (even if not shading dependencies)
> Do you see potential legal/technical issues?
Legally this depends on the jar licence.
As the jar is currently unknown (to me), I would say it is a legal issue.
> TIA,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [digester] providing additional shaded artifact
Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hi all guys,
I consider there are no objections, I'll fill an issue and start working on it.
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> to complete DIGESTER-153 we had to include CGLIB as new dependency,
> actually I would like to experiment distributing an *additional*
> artifact (jar) where dependencies are shaded - maybe also renamed for
> internal use only.
> Note that I don't want to replace the existing distribution, I just
> would like to add another jar - users could chose to use it instead.
> That wouldn't be the first time that a commons component would
> distribute more than one artifact anyway, [beanutils] already does
> (even if not shading dependencies)
> Do you see potential legal/technical issues?
> TIA,
> -Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org