You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> on 2003/01/17 21:32:51 UTC
Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Hi,
I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
Please cast your votes accordingly.
I did the roll with libtool 1.4.2. If this is a problem,
let me know, I'll upgrade my libtool to 1.4.3 and re-roll
ASAP.
Thanks,
Sander
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please cast your votes accordingly.
+1 for release... I just tested the recent libtool-1.4.3 roll
on AIX 5.2 with no problems...
generally, our tarballs used libtool < 1.4.2, so now I will get a
break from the usual Apache2-don't-build-on-AIX messages received
privately and seen on comp.unix.aix :)
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
> it would be even better if there was the ability for the apache.org
> mirroring system to do a "push signal" as a number of other archives
> now do (e.g gnome) via ssh. though maybe not for 159 mirrors if you think
> the overhead would be too much (i do) but this comes back to dividing up
> mirrors into "tier1" and "tier2" and then making a push signalling sync
> via ssh mandatory for a tier1.
Perhaps easier to temporarily take a mirror out of the redirect loop
automatically.
Dw
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
> it would be even better if there was the ability for the apache.org
> mirroring system to do a "push signal" as a number of other archives
> now do (e.g gnome) via ssh. though maybe not for 159 mirrors if you think
> the overhead would be too much (i do) but this comes back to dividing up
> mirrors into "tier1" and "tier2" and then making a push signalling sync
> via ssh mandatory for a tier1.
Perhaps easier to temporarily take a mirror out of the redirect loop
automatically.
Dw
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by jason andrade <ja...@rtfmconsult.com>.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
> put in the dist directory last evening:
>
> Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
>
> Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
> recommendation?
it would be even better if there was the ability for the apache.org
mirroring system to do a "push signal" as a number of other archives
now do (e.g gnome) via ssh. though maybe not for 159 mirrors if you think
the overhead would be too much (i do) but this comes back to dividing up
mirrors into "tier1" and "tier2" and then making a push signalling sync
via ssh mandatory for a tier1.
my $0.02 and merely a suggestion..
regards,
-jason
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by jason andrade <ja...@rtfmconsult.com>.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
> put in the dist directory last evening:
>
> Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
>
> Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
> recommendation?
it would be even better if there was the ability for the apache.org
mirroring system to do a "push signal" as a number of other archives
now do (e.g gnome) via ssh. though maybe not for 159 mirrors if you think
the overhead would be too much (i do) but this comes back to dividing up
mirrors into "tier1" and "tier2" and then making a push signalling sync
via ssh mandatory for a tier1.
my $0.02 and merely a suggestion..
regards,
-jason
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Pieter De Wit <pi...@vodacom.co.za>.
I am happy with this.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joshua Slive" <jo...@slive.ca>
To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Cc: <in...@apache.org>; <mi...@apache.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
> Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
> put in the dist directory last evening:
>
> Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
>
> Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
> recommendation?
>
> Joshua.
>
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
Or perhaps make a little plot; and see at what point somethign like 95%
has copied it across.
DW.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
> put in the dist directory last evening:
>
> Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
>
> Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
> recommendation?
>
> Joshua.
>
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
Or perhaps make a little plot; and see at what point somethign like 95%
has copied it across.
DW.
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
> Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
> put in the dist directory last evening:
>
> Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
>
> Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
> recommendation?
>
> Joshua.
>
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
put in the dist directory last evening:
Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
recommendation?
Joshua.
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
Just as an interesting data point based on the new 2.0.44 release being
put in the dist directory last evening:
Of our 159 mirrors, 125 have picked up the release over-night.
Perhaps we should make nightly updates a requirement rather than a
recommendation?
Joshua.
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Same here ... the win32 installers are now in place in /dist/httpd/binaries/win32
> and status has been updated.
*ahem*, could someone change the mod_autoindex config to use * length name
fields?
nd
--
>kann mir jemand sagen, was genau @-Domains sind?
Ein Mythos. Ein Werbetrick. Verarsche. Nenn es wie du willst...
-- Alexandra Buss und Björn Höhrmann in dciwam
RE: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 04:03 PM 1/18/2003, Sander Striker wrote:
>> From: Joshua Slive [mailto:joshua@slive.ca]
>> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 10:59 PM
>
>> On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Sander Striker wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks all!
>> >
>> > Moved the tarballs to the official location.
>> > I will be updating the website in my next spare moment.
>>
>> I would wait at least overnight if you want any hope of download.cgi
>> finding valid mirrors.
>
>Yeah, I'm calling it a night anyway.
Same here ... the win32 installers are now in place in /dist/httpd/binaries/win32
and status has been updated.
Good show, Sander!
Bill
RE: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
> From: Joshua Slive [mailto:joshua@slive.ca]
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 10:59 PM
> On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Sander Striker wrote:
>
> > Thanks all!
> >
> > Moved the tarballs to the official location.
> > I will be updating the website in my next spare moment.
>
> I would wait at least overnight if you want any hope of download.cgi
> finding valid mirrors.
Yeah, I'm calling it a night anyway.
Sander
RE: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
On Sat, 18 Jan 2003, Sander Striker wrote:
> Thanks all!
>
> Moved the tarballs to the official location.
> I will be updating the website in my next spare moment.
I would wait at least overnight if you want any hope of download.cgi
finding valid mirrors.
Joshua.
RE: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
Thanks all!
Moved the tarballs to the official location.
I will be updating the website in my next spare moment.
Sander
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Brian Pane <br...@cnet.com>.
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 12:32, Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please cast your votes accordingly.
Tested successfully with worker MPM on Linux
+1
-Brian
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@apache.org>.
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 9:32 PM +0100 Sander Striker
<st...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please cast your votes accordingly.
Compiles and runs on Darwin. +1.
This is so ridiculously overdue, it isn't funny.
Thanks for seeing this one through. =) -- justin
RE: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@apache.org>.
At 10:15 AM 1/18/2003, Sander Striker wrote:
>It is a small effort to re-roll with 1.4.3 and therefor I'll do
>just that.
>
>In the re-roll I have bumped CHANGES, Makefile.win* and
>srclib/pcre/NWGNUmakefile, since these contained small wrongs
>that didn't touch code or were platform specific minor fixes.
>
>Anyway, the new tarballs are up at:
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
The corresponding -win32-src.zip package was updated and sent up
to /dev/dist. All of Sander's changes are up-to-date. New .mak/.dep
files were rolled (twice) because the machine I rolled the .zip package
on didn't have a proper headers exclusion list (and therefore picked
up some local PSDK headers, my bad for not double checking before.)
On yet another machine that .zip builds and installs successfully. Nice
to have one other user try that build.
Finally, working on the Win32 installer changes, and a test of that should
be up and ready later this afternoon. We have the new bin/iconv/*.so files
to include in the binary release, amoung other new changes.
Bill
RE: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
> From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:jerenkrantz@apache.org]
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 10:52 AM
> --On Friday, January 17, 2003 4:50 PM -0800 Greg Stein
> <gs...@lyra.org> wrote:
>
> > Isn't 1.4.3 needed for MacOS compatibility, and maybe one of those
> > fool IBM operating systems?
>
> And, that fool Sun one, too. =) I haven't consistently seen the
> problem that forced Subversion to require libtool 1.4.3 on Solaris,
> but I have seen it before. (Which is claimed to be fixed by using
> /usr/xpg4/bin/sed rather than /usr/bin/sed.) Therefore, at a
> minimum, libtool 1.4.3 should be the requirement for any ASF
> httpd-2.x releases.
Which is why I now upgraded my libtool to 1.4.3. I must have
forgotten to update it when I reinstalled my system a while back.
> Note that I don't think it is pressing that Sander should re-roll
> with 1.4.3, but it might not also be a bad idea, either.
It is a small effort to re-roll with 1.4.3 and therefor I'll do
just that.
>> If we don't want all developers to be subject to that requirement,
>> then we make make the distribution script (the tarball roller)
>> enforce the stronger check.
>> (in Subversion, the build check looks for autoconf 2.5x and libtool
>> 1.4.x, but the dist.sh script enforces libtool 1.4.3)
>
> Yeah, I'd prefer we enforce that the RM have the latest tool sets not
> for all developers. We shouldn't *require* autoconf-2.5x on the RM
> machine, but libtool-1.4.3+ is one that I think we need. -- justin
This is why I started on the new release script, which, btw, will
have the requirement checks. Guess what it is based on? ;)
I've rolled this release with the new script and that seems to go
fine.
In the re-roll I have bumped CHANGES, Makefile.win* and
srclib/pcre/NWGNUmakefile, since these contained small wrongs
that didn't touch code or were platform specific minor fixes.
Anyway, the new tarballs are up at:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
If noone encounters any problems with them I'll move them to
the official dist area for general consumption. I'll announce it
on monday so the mirrors have a little time to pick it up.
Sander
*) See other mail 'Win32 and Apache 2.0.44'.
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@apache.org>.
--On Friday, January 17, 2003 4:50 PM -0800 Greg Stein
<gs...@lyra.org> wrote:
> Isn't 1.4.3 needed for MacOS compatibility, and maybe one of those
> fool IBM operating systems?
And, that fool Sun one, too. =) I haven't consistently seen the
problem that forced Subversion to require libtool 1.4.3 on Solaris,
but I have seen it before. (Which is claimed to be fixed by using
/usr/xpg4/bin/sed rather than /usr/bin/sed.) Therefore, at a
minimum, libtool 1.4.3 should be the requirement for any ASF
httpd-2.x releases.
Note that I don't think it is pressing that Sander should re-roll
with 1.4.3, but it might not also be a bad idea, either.
> If we don't want all developers to be subject to that requirement,
> then we make make the distribution script (the tarball roller)
> enforce the stronger check.
> (in Subversion, the build check looks for autoconf 2.5x and libtool
> 1.4.x, but the dist.sh script enforces libtool 1.4.3)
Yeah, I'd prefer we enforce that the RM have the latest tool sets not
for all developers. We shouldn't *require* autoconf-2.5x on the RM
machine, but libtool-1.4.3+ is one that I think we need. -- justin
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Greg Stein wrote:
> Isn't 1.4.3 needed for MacOS compatibility, and maybe one of those fool IBM
> operating systems?
If you're referring to AIX, 1.4.2 is fine. For z/OS, you need my/dreid's
libtool regardless.
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 09:32:51PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please cast your votes accordingly.
>
>
> I did the roll with libtool 1.4.2. If this is a problem,
> let me know, I'll upgrade my libtool to 1.4.3 and re-roll
> ASAP.
Isn't 1.4.3 needed for MacOS compatibility, and maybe one of those fool IBM
operating systems?
And isn't it about frickin' time to just change the code to require autoconf
2.5x and libtool 1.4.x ? "make sure you roll with libtool FOO" Screw it.
Make it require that you do that.
If we don't want all developers to be subject to that requirement, then we
make make the distribution script (the tarball roller) enforce the stronger
check.
(in Subversion, the build check looks for autoconf 2.5x and libtool 1.4.x,
but the dist.sh script enforces libtool 1.4.3)
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 12:46 PM 1/18/2003, Sander Temme wrote:
>Gives me the following perl-framework test report:
>
>Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>ssl/http.t 9 2304 2 2 100.00% 1-2
>7 tests skipped.
>*** server localhost:8529 shutdown
>!!! error running tests (please examine t/logs/error_log)
>
>We knew about ssl/http.t: that has been broken for a while.
Yup, this is testing the HTTP over HTTPS failure case. It's looking
for an HTTP/1.0 response and getting an HTTP/0.9 response.
The right fix is actually to provide the 'proper' response, HTTP/0.9 for
any ass-backwards requests, and HTTP/1.0/1.1 with headers,
for modern requests. And I 'think' I have a cool solve for this...
>+1 for release.
Considering this exception, I concur... it's inconsequential (or I wouldn't
have let it stay broken this long!!!)
But I'm not yet ready to +1 on my own platforms ;-) Working on it.
Bill
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Sander Temme <sc...@covalent.net>.
> ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _regcomp
> /Users/dirkx/tmp/asf/httpd-2.0.44/srclib/pcre/.libs/libpcre.al(pcreposix.lo)
> definition of _regcomp in section (__TEXT,__text)
> /usr/lib/libm.dylib(regcomp.So) definition of _regcomp
This has been there for a long time and appears to be harmless: we include a
regex parser, but there is one already in libSystem.dylib. We apparently
link against libm, which on Darwin is just a soft link to the System
library:
[MonaLisa:/usr/lib] sctemme% ls -l libm.dylib
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Jan 19 10:35 libm.dylib -> libSystem.dylib
[MonaLisa:/usr/lib] sctemme% ls -l libc.dylib
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Jan 19 10:35 libc.dylib -> libSystem.dylib
[MonaLisa:/usr/lib] sctemme% ls -l libSystem.dylib
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17 Jan 19 10:35 libSystem.dylib ->
libSystem.B.dylib
[MonaLisa:/usr/lib] sctemme% ls -l libSystem.B.dylib
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1245772 Dec 14 02:58 libSystem.B.dylib
(They put this in I believe in 10.1/Darwin 5; before there was only
libSystem.dylib)
S.
--
Covalent Technologies sctemme@covalent.net
Engineering group Voice: (415) 856 4214
303 Second Street #375 South Fax: (415) 856 4210
San Francisco CA 94107
PGP Fingerprint: 7A8D B189 E871 80CB 9521 9320 C11E 7B47 964F 31D9
=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message
=======================================================
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
> Sander Striker wrote:
..libtool...
Works for me gov on MacOSX.
But I did notice two warnings which may have not been there with the newer
libtool (plus I need to check why it includes /usr/local; I really dislike
configure making assumptions that buildbox==deploybox).
Dw.
c1: warning: changing search order for system directory
"/usr/local/include"
cc1: warning: as it has already been specified as a non-system directory
ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _regcomp
/Users/dirkx/tmp/asf/httpd-2.0.44/srclib/pcre/.libs/libpcre.al(pcreposix.lo) definition of _regcomp in section (__TEXT,__text)
/usr/lib/libm.dylib(regcomp.So) definition of _regcomp
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
Sander Striker wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
>Please cast your votes accordingly.
>
>
>I did the roll with libtool 1.4.2. If this is a problem,
>let me know, I'll upgrade my libtool to 1.4.3 and re-roll
>ASAP.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Sander
>
>
>
WooHoo!! Thanks Sander!
Bill
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Sander Striker wrote:
> I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please cast your votes accordingly.
Didn't test it at the moment, but I guess, the CHANGES file should not
contain 2.0.45 changes... ;-)
nd
--
If God intended people to be naked, they would be born that way.
-- Oscar Wilde
Re: Tagged and Rolled 2.0.44
Posted by Sander Temme <sc...@covalent.net>.
> Hi,
>
> I just tagged and rolled 2.0.44. Tarballs are up at:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> Please cast your votes accordingly.
>
>
> I did the roll with libtool 1.4.2. If this is a problem,
> let me know, I'll upgrade my libtool to 1.4.3 and re-roll
> ASAP.
Just tested the latest (as of this time) roll on my darwin test machine:
Darwin shadow.local. 6.3 Darwin Kernel Version 6.3: Sat Dec 14 03:11:25 PST
2002; root:xnu/xnu-344.23.obj~4/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
sctemme@shadow:~/projects/httpd-2.0.44 $ cat config.nice
#! /bin/sh
#
# Created by configure
"./configure" \
"--prefix=/tmp/apache2044" \
"--enable-mods-shared=all" \
"--enable-deflate=shared" \
"--enable-ssl=shared" \
"--enable-bucketeer=shared" \
"--enable-echo=shared" \
"--with-port=8080" \
"--enable-maintainer-mode" \
"--enable-so" \
"--with-layout=Apache" \
"$@"
Gives me the following perl-framework test report:
Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
ssl/http.t 9 2304 2 2 100.00% 1-2
7 tests skipped.
*** server localhost:8529 shutdown
!!! error running tests (please examine t/logs/error_log)
We knew about ssl/http.t: that has been broken for a while.
Then repeated with worker, same ./configure except for --with-mpm=worker and
--prefix=/tmp/apache2044w:
Failed Test Status Wstat Total Fail Failed List of failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
ssl/http.t 9 2304 2 2 100.00% 1-2
7 tests skipped.
*** server localhost:8529 shutdown
!!! error running tests (please examine t/logs/error_log)
Same result.
+1 for release.
S.
--
Covalent Technologies sctemme@covalent.net
Engineering group Voice: (415) 856 4214
303 Second Street #375 South Fax: (415) 856 4210
San Francisco CA 94107
PGP Fingerprint: 7A8D B189 E871 80CB 9521 9320 C11E 7B47 964F 31D9
=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message
=======================================================