You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cayenne.apache.org by "Øyvind Harboe (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/02/18 13:46:45 UTC
[jira] Commented: (CAY-512) Keep DataObjects in commited state for
no-op writeProperties
[ https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13247#action_13247 ]
Øyvind Harboe commented on CAY-512:
-----------------------------------
hasChanges() has problems in my case for Cayenne 3.x and I wrote the following code to work around false postivies for hasChanges().
I think my observation belongs as a comment to this JIRA (even if I don't understant the details of the report) rather than a fresh report.
/** DataContext.hasChanges() doesn't work because it returns true for "phantom" changes */
static public boolean checkIfChanges(DataContext dataContext)
{
if (dataContext.hasChanges())
{
return !dataContext.getObjectStore().getChanges().isNoop();
}
return false;
}
> Keep DataObjects in commited state for no-op writeProperties
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CAY-512
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/cayenne/browse/CAY-512
> Project: Cayenne
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Cayenne Core Library
> Affects Versions: 1.2 branch
> Environment: M9-B1
> Reporter: Mike Kienenberger
> Assignee: Andrus Adamchik
> Fix For: Undefined future
>
>
> Regression: Cayenne M9+ sets DataObjects as "modified" during no-op writeProperties
> writeProperty("x", "y") puts dataObject into a modified state when "y" was already the value of "x" before the method call.
> Before M9, object would remain in committed state.
> Object in my ObjectStore:
> <ObjectId:Announcement, ANNOUNCEMENT_ID=200>={<ObjectId:Announcement,
> ANNOUNCEMENT_ID=200>; modified; [enabled=>Y; description=>SNAP;
> contentList=>(..); effectiveEndDate=>Mon Oct 31 00:00:00 EST 2005;
> effectiveStartDate=>Thu Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2005;
> qualifiedViewpointList=>(..)]}
> ObjectDiff of record -- appears to indicate that nothing has changed.
> Same as the other 4 restored objects.
> Comparision of snapshot values to object store values shows nothing different.
> value= ObjectDiff (id=3310)
> arcSnapshot= HashMap (id=3311)
> currentArcSnapshot= null
> diffId= 1
> flatIds= null
> nodeId= ObjectId (id=3309)
> objectStore= ObjectStore (id=3200)
> otherDiffs= null
> snapshot= HashMap (id=3312)
> org.objectstyle.cayenne.access.ObjectDiff@133d68a
> {}
> null
> 1
> null
> <ObjectId:Announcement, ANNOUNCEMENT_ID=200>
> org.objectstyle.cayenne.access.ObjectStore@c0cf
> null
> {enabled=Y, description=SNAP, effectiveEndDate=Mon Oct 31 00:00:00 EST
> 2005, effectiveStartDate=Thu Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2005}
> A workaround has been to add code in my BaseDataObject class to check
> for the old value equaling the new value in writeProperty(), and if
> so, do nothing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.