You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Claude Warren <cl...@xenei.com> on 2017/02/08 09:21:44 UTC
Java 9
While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He indicted
that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works with
Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and indicated
that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not certain
I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the other
TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in this area.
I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
Claude
--
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
Re: Java 9
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Status of plug-ins:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw
Andy
On 20/08/17 20:06, Claude Warren wrote:
> I just commented them out in the poms. I too was just trying to get
> something to compile. I figured once the compile worked it would be
> possible to go back and work with the plugin projects to get them fixed.
>
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> No branch but maybe we need one. I was just trying to something/anything
>> to run.
>>
>> What did you do - remove their use pro-tem?
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> mvn versions:display-plugin-updates ==>
>>
>> The following plugin updates are available:
>> org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin ................. 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4
>> maven-checkstyle-plugin ................................ 2.15 -> 2.17
>> maven-pmd-plugin ......................................... 3.4 -> 3.6
>> maven-shade-plugin ..................................... 2.3 -> 2.4.3
>> maven-surefire-report-plugin ....................... 2.18.1 -> 2.19.1
>>
>> [WARNING] The following plugins do not have their version specified:
>> maven-compiler-plugin ...................................... 3.5.1
>> maven-dependency-plugin .................... (from super-pom) 2.10
>> maven-enforcer-plugin ...................................... 1.4.1
>> maven-jar-plugin ........................................... 3.0.0
>> maven-javadoc-plugin ...................................... 2.10.3
>> maven-resources-plugin ....................................... 2.7
>> maven-source-plugin ........................................ 3.0.0
>> maven-surefire-plugin ..................................... 2.19.1
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20/08/17 19:29, Claude Warren wrote:
>>
>>> Andy,
>>>
>>> Is there a branch for the java 9 work? it looks like the
>>> maven-enforcer-plugin is causing problems. As I recall there were several
>>> enforcer/reporting plugins that caused problems (Rat included I think).
>>>
>>> I also note that there is an issue with the jenkins remoting software, but
>>> it looks like it continues to run anyway.
>>>
>>> Claude
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Claude,
>>>>
>>>> I set up a manually run job on Jenkins to help with this:
>>>>
>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Jena_Development_JDK9/
>>>>
>>>> but it runs immediately into plugin problems.
>>>>
>>>> What upgrades did you disable and which upgrade to get anything to
>>>> minimally compile?
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>> On 04/06/17 13:43, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I was trying to get a PR for the java9 changes but am having significant
>>>>> problems running java at all.
>>>>>
>>>>> There were very few changes made for Java9 (only 1 test I thing) and
>>>>> several plugins that did not work. I think it would be faster to set
>>>>> up a
>>>>> bigger development box to perform the java 9 builds and fixes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of the problems, I am going to drop the branch and may start
>>>>> over
>>>>> again in the future.
>>>>>
>>>>> Claude
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=2651742
>>>>>> 7955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it. I have not
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> merged
>>>>>>> in the last big batch of changes. but take a look. I got it to
>>>>>>> compile
>>>>>>> and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work. I will be
>>>>>>> looking at that shortly. I also removed (commented out)
>>>>>>> cobertura-maven-plugin
>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> findbugs-maven-plugin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> from the parent.pom.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
>>>>>>> compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the
>>>>>>> basic
>>>>>>> build functionality works.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Repository is at https://github.com/Claudenw/jena
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Claude
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> indicted
>>>>>>>>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works
>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and
>>>>>>>>> indicated
>>>>>>>>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not
>>>>>>>>> certain
>>>>>>>>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the
>>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in
>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>> area.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Claude
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Java 9
Posted by Claude Warren <cl...@xenei.com>.
I just commented them out in the poms. I too was just trying to get
something to compile. I figured once the compile worked it would be
possible to go back and work with the plugin projects to get them fixed.
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> No branch but maybe we need one. I was just trying to something/anything
> to run.
>
> What did you do - remove their use pro-tem?
>
> Andy
>
> mvn versions:display-plugin-updates ==>
>
> The following plugin updates are available:
> org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin ................. 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4
> maven-checkstyle-plugin ................................ 2.15 -> 2.17
> maven-pmd-plugin ......................................... 3.4 -> 3.6
> maven-shade-plugin ..................................... 2.3 -> 2.4.3
> maven-surefire-report-plugin ....................... 2.18.1 -> 2.19.1
>
> [WARNING] The following plugins do not have their version specified:
> maven-compiler-plugin ...................................... 3.5.1
> maven-dependency-plugin .................... (from super-pom) 2.10
> maven-enforcer-plugin ...................................... 1.4.1
> maven-jar-plugin ........................................... 3.0.0
> maven-javadoc-plugin ...................................... 2.10.3
> maven-resources-plugin ....................................... 2.7
> maven-source-plugin ........................................ 3.0.0
> maven-surefire-plugin ..................................... 2.19.1
>
>
>
>
> On 20/08/17 19:29, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> Andy,
>>
>> Is there a branch for the java 9 work? it looks like the
>> maven-enforcer-plugin is causing problems. As I recall there were several
>> enforcer/reporting plugins that caused problems (Rat included I think).
>>
>> I also note that there is an issue with the jenkins remoting software, but
>> it looks like it continues to run anyway.
>>
>> Claude
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Claude,
>>>
>>> I set up a manually run job on Jenkins to help with this:
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Jena_Development_JDK9/
>>>
>>> but it runs immediately into plugin problems.
>>>
>>> What upgrades did you disable and which upgrade to get anything to
>>> minimally compile?
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>> On 04/06/17 13:43, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>
>>> I was trying to get a PR for the java9 changes but am having significant
>>>> problems running java at all.
>>>>
>>>> There were very few changes made for Java9 (only 1 test I thing) and
>>>> several plugins that did not work. I think it would be faster to set
>>>> up a
>>>> bigger development box to perform the java 9 builds and fixes.
>>>>
>>>> Because of the problems, I am going to drop the branch and may start
>>>> over
>>>> again in the future.
>>>>
>>>> Claude
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=2651742
>>>>> 7955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092
>>>>>
>>>>> What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it. I have not
>>>>>
>>>>>> merged
>>>>>> in the last big batch of changes. but take a look. I got it to
>>>>>> compile
>>>>>> and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work. I will be
>>>>>> looking at that shortly. I also removed (commented out)
>>>>>> cobertura-maven-plugin
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> findbugs-maven-plugin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> from the parent.pom.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
>>>>>> compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the
>>>>>> basic
>>>>>> build functionality works.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Repository is at https://github.com/Claudenw/jena
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Claude
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> indicted
>>>>>>>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and
>>>>>>>> indicated
>>>>>>>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not
>>>>>>>> certain
>>>>>>>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the
>>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>> area.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Claude
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
--
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
Re: Java 9
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
No branch but maybe we need one. I was just trying to
something/anything to run.
What did you do - remove their use pro-tem?
Andy
mvn versions:display-plugin-updates ==>
The following plugin updates are available:
org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin ................. 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4
maven-checkstyle-plugin ................................ 2.15 -> 2.17
maven-pmd-plugin ......................................... 3.4 -> 3.6
maven-shade-plugin ..................................... 2.3 -> 2.4.3
maven-surefire-report-plugin ....................... 2.18.1 -> 2.19.1
[WARNING] The following plugins do not have their version specified:
maven-compiler-plugin ...................................... 3.5.1
maven-dependency-plugin .................... (from super-pom) 2.10
maven-enforcer-plugin ...................................... 1.4.1
maven-jar-plugin ........................................... 3.0.0
maven-javadoc-plugin ...................................... 2.10.3
maven-resources-plugin ....................................... 2.7
maven-source-plugin ........................................ 3.0.0
maven-surefire-plugin ..................................... 2.19.1
On 20/08/17 19:29, Claude Warren wrote:
> Andy,
>
> Is there a branch for the java 9 work? it looks like the
> maven-enforcer-plugin is causing problems. As I recall there were several
> enforcer/reporting plugins that caused problems (Rat included I think).
>
> I also note that there is an issue with the jenkins remoting software, but
> it looks like it continues to run anyway.
>
> Claude
>
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Claude,
>>
>> I set up a manually run job on Jenkins to help with this:
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Jena_Development_JDK9/
>>
>> but it runs immediately into plugin problems.
>>
>> What upgrades did you disable and which upgrade to get anything to
>> minimally compile?
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> On 04/06/17 13:43, Claude Warren wrote:
>>
>>> I was trying to get a PR for the java9 changes but am having significant
>>> problems running java at all.
>>>
>>> There were very few changes made for Java9 (only 1 test I thing) and
>>> several plugins that did not work. I think it would be faster to set up a
>>> bigger development box to perform the java 9 builds and fixes.
>>>
>>> Because of the problems, I am going to drop the branch and may start over
>>> again in the future.
>>>
>>> Claude
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes?
>>>>
>>>> And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=2651742
>>>> 7955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092
>>>>
>>>> What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess.
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>> On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it. I have not
>>>>> merged
>>>>> in the last big batch of changes. but take a look. I got it to compile
>>>>> and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work. I will be
>>>>> looking at that shortly. I also removed (commented out)
>>>>> cobertura-maven-plugin
>>>>> and
>>>>> findbugs-maven-plugin
>>>>>
>>>>> from the parent.pom.
>>>>>
>>>>> My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
>>>>> compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the
>>>>> basic
>>>>> build functionality works.
>>>>>
>>>>> Repository is at https://github.com/Claudenw/jena
>>>>>
>>>>> Claude
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> indicted
>>>>>>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and
>>>>>>> indicated
>>>>>>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not
>>>>>>> certain
>>>>>>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the
>>>>>>> other
>>>>>>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in this
>>>>>>> area.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Claude
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Java 9
Posted by Claude Warren <cl...@xenei.com>.
Andy,
Is there a branch for the java 9 work? it looks like the
maven-enforcer-plugin is causing problems. As I recall there were several
enforcer/reporting plugins that caused problems (Rat included I think).
I also note that there is an issue with the jenkins remoting software, but
it looks like it continues to run anyway.
Claude
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Claude,
>
> I set up a manually run job on Jenkins to help with this:
>
> https://builds.apache.org/job/Jena_Development_JDK9/
>
> but it runs immediately into plugin problems.
>
> What upgrades did you disable and which upgrade to get anything to
> minimally compile?
>
> Andy
>
> On 04/06/17 13:43, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> I was trying to get a PR for the java9 changes but am having significant
>> problems running java at all.
>>
>> There were very few changes made for Java9 (only 1 test I thing) and
>> several plugins that did not work. I think it would be faster to set up a
>> bigger development box to perform the java 9 builds and fixes.
>>
>> Because of the problems, I am going to drop the branch and may start over
>> again in the future.
>>
>> Claude
>>
>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes?
>>>
>>> And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against.
>>>
>>> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=2651742
>>> 7955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092
>>>
>>> What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>> On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>
>>> I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it. I have not
>>>> merged
>>>> in the last big batch of changes. but take a look. I got it to compile
>>>> and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work. I will be
>>>> looking at that shortly. I also removed (commented out)
>>>> cobertura-maven-plugin
>>>> and
>>>> findbugs-maven-plugin
>>>>
>>>> from the parent.pom.
>>>>
>>>> My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
>>>> compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the
>>>> basic
>>>> build functionality works.
>>>>
>>>> Repository is at https://github.com/Claudenw/jena
>>>>
>>>> Claude
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He
>>>>>
>>>>>> indicted
>>>>>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and
>>>>>> indicated
>>>>>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not
>>>>>> certain
>>>>>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the
>>>>>> other
>>>>>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in this
>>>>>> area.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Claude
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files
>>>>>> in
>>>>>>
>>>>> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
--
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
Re: Java 9
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Hi Claude,
I set up a manually run job on Jenkins to help with this:
https://builds.apache.org/job/Jena_Development_JDK9/
but it runs immediately into plugin problems.
What upgrades did you disable and which upgrade to get anything to
minimally compile?
Andy
On 04/06/17 13:43, Claude Warren wrote:
> I was trying to get a PR for the java9 changes but am having significant
> problems running java at all.
>
> There were very few changes made for Java9 (only 1 test I thing) and
> several plugins that did not work. I think it would be faster to set up a
> bigger development box to perform the java 9 builds and fixes.
>
> Because of the problems, I am going to drop the branch and may start over
> again in the future.
>
> Claude
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes?
>>
>> And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against.
>>
>> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=2651742
>> 7955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092
>>
>> What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess.
>>
>> Andy
>>
>> On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote:
>>
>>> I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it. I have not
>>> merged
>>> in the last big batch of changes. but take a look. I got it to compile
>>> and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work. I will be
>>> looking at that shortly. I also removed (commented out)
>>> cobertura-maven-plugin
>>> and
>>> findbugs-maven-plugin
>>>
>>> from the parent.pom.
>>>
>>> My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
>>> compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the basic
>>> build functionality works.
>>>
>>> Repository is at https://github.com/Claudenw/jena
>>>
>>> Claude
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>>
>>>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He
>>>>> indicted
>>>>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works with
>>>>> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and indicated
>>>>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not
>>>>> certain
>>>>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the
>>>>> other
>>>>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in this
>>>>> area.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>> Claude
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files in
>>>> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
>>>>
>>>> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
>>>>
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
>>>>
>>>> Andy
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: Java 9
Posted by Claude Warren <cl...@xenei.com>.
I was trying to get a PR for the java9 changes but am having significant
problems running java at all.
There were very few changes made for Java9 (only 1 test I thing) and
several plugins that did not work. I think it would be faster to set up a
bigger development box to perform the java 9 builds and fixes.
Because of the problems, I am going to drop the branch and may start over
again in the future.
Claude
On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
> Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes?
>
> And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against.
>
> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=2651742
> 7955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092
>
> What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess.
>
> Andy
>
> On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it. I have not
>> merged
>> in the last big batch of changes. but take a look. I got it to compile
>> and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work. I will be
>> looking at that shortly. I also removed (commented out)
>> cobertura-maven-plugin
>> and
>> findbugs-maven-plugin
>>
>> from the parent.pom.
>>
>> My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
>> compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the basic
>> build functionality works.
>>
>> Repository is at https://github.com/Claudenw/jena
>>
>> Claude
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>
>>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He
>>>> indicted
>>>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works with
>>>> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and indicated
>>>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not
>>>> certain
>>>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the
>>>> other
>>>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in this
>>>> area.
>>>>
>>>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>>>>
>>>> Claude
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files in
>>> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
>>>
>>> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
--
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
Re: Java 9
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
From http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/jdk9-dev/2017-May/005864.html
Java9 release date slips 8 weeks: 27 July to 21 September
Andy
On 10/05/17 21:48, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes?
>
> And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against.
>
> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=26517427955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092
>
>
> What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess.
>
> Andy
>
> On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote:
>> I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it. I have not
>> merged
>> in the last big batch of changes. but take a look. I got it to compile
>> and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work. I will be
>> looking at that shortly. I also removed (commented out)
>> cobertura-maven-plugin
>> and
>> findbugs-maven-plugin
>>
>> from the parent.pom.
>>
>> My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
>> compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the basic
>> build functionality works.
>>
>> Repository is at https://github.com/Claudenw/jena
>>
>> Claude
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
>>>
>>>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He
>>>> indicted
>>>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works
>>>> with
>>>> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and
>>>> indicated
>>>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not
>>>> certain
>>>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the
>>>> other
>>>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in this
>>>> area.
>>>>
>>>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>>>>
>>>> Claude
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files in
>>> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
>>>
>>> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
>>>
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Java 9
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes?
And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against.
https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=26517427955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092
What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess.
Andy
On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote:
> I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it. I have not merged
> in the last big batch of changes. but take a look. I got it to compile
> and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work. I will be
> looking at that shortly. I also removed (commented out)
> cobertura-maven-plugin
> and
> findbugs-maven-plugin
>
> from the parent.pom.
>
> My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
> compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the basic
> build functionality works.
>
> Repository is at https://github.com/Claudenw/jena
>
> Claude
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
>>
>>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He indicted
>>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works with
>>> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and indicated
>>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not
>>> certain
>>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the other
>>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in this
>>> area.
>>>
>>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>>>
>>> Claude
>>>
>>>
>> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files in
>> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
>>
>> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
>>
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
>>
>> Andy
>>
>
>
>
Re: Java 9
Posted by Claude Warren <cl...@xenei.com>.
I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it. I have not merged
in the last big batch of changes. but take a look. I got it to compile
and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work. I will be
looking at that shortly. I also removed (commented out)
cobertura-maven-plugin
and
findbugs-maven-plugin
from the parent.pom.
My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the basic
build functionality works.
Repository is at https://github.com/Claudenw/jena
Claude
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
>
>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He indicted
>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works with
>> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and indicated
>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not
>> certain
>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the other
>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in this
>> area.
>>
>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>>
>> Claude
>>
>>
> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files in
> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
>
> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
>
> Andy
>
--
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web
<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
Re: Java 9
Posted by Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>.
On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:
> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He indicted
> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works with
> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and indicated
> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not certain
> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the other
> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in this area.
>
> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.
>
> Claude
>
Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files in
Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.
Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)
Andy