You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Sean Owen <sr...@apache.org> on 2011/05/28 17:02:14 UTC
[VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-014
This has the fix for Jeff's issue, and I believe I took a good swipe at
cleaning up license issues -- and did get it to put the NOTICE.txt and
LICENSE.txt in the top-level in all distro artifacts as expected.
Have another look; targeting release for Tuesday if all is well.
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
Thanks, Sean!
On Jun 1, 2011, at 11:32 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> Release is propagating to the mirrors now, and I'll update the site
> tomorrow. Otherwise, we're clear to resume normal work on HEAD.
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> (It's in the main release package at distribution/KEYS. Whether or not
>> there's a better place, I dunno, but that's where it lives in SVN too.)
>>
>> OK well that is 3 +1s (Jeff, Sean, Grant, plus what I think would be other
>> +1s again based on feedback on previous RCs), no vetoes, 72 hours, etc etc.
>> so looks like we have a release! I'll proceed.
>>
>> Sean
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
Release is propagating to the mirrors now, and I'll update the site
tomorrow. Otherwise, we're clear to resume normal work on HEAD.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (It's in the main release package at distribution/KEYS. Whether or not
> there's a better place, I dunno, but that's where it lives in SVN too.)
>
> OK well that is 3 +1s (Jeff, Sean, Grant, plus what I think would be other
> +1s again based on feedback on previous RCs), no vetoes, 72 hours, etc etc.
> so looks like we have a release! I'll proceed.
>
> Sean
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
(It's in the main release package at distribution/KEYS. Whether or not
there's a better place, I dunno, but that's where it lives in SVN too.)
OK well that is 3 +1s (Jeff, Sean, Grant, plus what I think would be other
+1s again based on feedback on previous RCs), no vetoes, 72 hours, etc etc.
so looks like we have a release! I'll proceed.
Sean
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1. The only thing I noticed is we don't have the KEYS file in the
> distribution, but I don't think that is a requirement as long as our details
> on downloading points to where the KEYS file is.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
+1. The only thing I noticed is we don't have the KEYS file in the distribution, but I don't think that is a requirement as long as our details on downloading points to where the KEYS file is.
On May 28, 2011, at 11:02 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-014
>
> This has the fix for Jeff's issue, and I believe I took a good swipe at
> cleaning up license issues -- and did get it to put the NOTICE.txt and
> LICENSE.txt in the top-level in all distro artifacts as expected.
>
> Have another look; targeting release for Tuesday if all is well.
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
I'll try, I'l travelling today but will wash up at a hotel in the afternoon.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So that's a +1 from Jeff and me, a qualified +1 from Dmitriy and Ted, and no
> word yet from Grant.
> I do think it's importnat process-wise to have a +1 on this particular RC.
> If Ted, Benson, Dmitriy or Grant could steal some minutes to re-review that
> the recent problems are addressed and give a thumbs up, I can ship it!
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
>
>> I've installed the take 3 .gz bits and they built without issue. I've run
>> the synthetic control examples on both my clusters and they also ran without
>> issue. The clustering display examples run in local mode and SpectralK still
>> has the same file path problem I reported earlier. The 20 newsgroups example
>> runs on MapR but still gets the version mismatch error on my CDH3 cluster.
>> So no changes since take 2 but these don't seem like showstoppers to me.
>>
>> +1 for take 3
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dmitriy Lyubimov [mailto:dlieu.7@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 11:50 AM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>>
>> For what it's worth i can add +1 but on the same basis i did it
>> before take 3. I won't be able to verify any of these new problems any
>> time soon.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
>> > Will try to get you one today :)
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:59 AM
>> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>> >
>> > Legally, we need 3 +1's on this thread on this RC.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> I did some cluster testing of take 2 and only found one potential issue
>> surfaced by an example that is broken. Haven't waded through the 100+
>> postings since I got back last night, but it looked good to me then.
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:04 AM
>> >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>> >>
>> >> I am rushing around clearing the decks for my trip to Europe, but I very
>> >> much hope to take a gander today.
>> >>
>> >> Over the weekend, I did use the trunk distribution with good results. I
>> >> didn't get the map-reduce stuff going since I was focussed on SGD work.
>> >> There is a possible niggling issue with SGD, but should not hold up the
>> >> release.
>> >>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s
>> carry
>> >>> over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC.
>> *Do*
>> >>> have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great
>> to
>> >>> finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
>> >>> >wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Looking now.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
So that's a +1 from Jeff and me, a qualified +1 from Dmitriy and Ted, and no
word yet from Grant.
I do think it's importnat process-wise to have a +1 on this particular RC.
If Ted, Benson, Dmitriy or Grant could steal some minutes to re-review that
the recent problems are addressed and give a thumbs up, I can ship it!
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> I've installed the take 3 .gz bits and they built without issue. I've run
> the synthetic control examples on both my clusters and they also ran without
> issue. The clustering display examples run in local mode and SpectralK still
> has the same file path problem I reported earlier. The 20 newsgroups example
> runs on MapR but still gets the version mismatch error on my CDH3 cluster.
> So no changes since take 2 but these don't seem like showstoppers to me.
>
> +1 for take 3
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitriy Lyubimov [mailto:dlieu.7@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 11:50 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>
> For what it's worth i can add +1 but on the same basis i did it
> before take 3. I won't be able to verify any of these new problems any
> time soon.
>
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> > Will try to get you one today :)
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:59 AM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
> >
> > Legally, we need 3 +1's on this thread on this RC.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com>
> wrote:
> >> I did some cluster testing of take 2 and only found one potential issue
> surfaced by an example that is broken. Haven't waded through the 100+
> postings since I got back last night, but it looked good to me then.
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:04 AM
> >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
> >>
> >> I am rushing around clearing the decks for my trip to Europe, but I very
> >> much hope to take a gander today.
> >>
> >> Over the weekend, I did use the trunk distribution with good results. I
> >> didn't get the map-reduce stuff going since I was focussed on SGD work.
> >> There is a possible niggling issue with SGD, but should not hold up the
> >> release.
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s
> carry
> >>> over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC.
> *Do*
> >>> have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great
> to
> >>> finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready.
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
> >>> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Looking now.
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Jeff Eastman <je...@Narus.com>.
I've installed the take 3 .gz bits and they built without issue. I've run the synthetic control examples on both my clusters and they also ran without issue. The clustering display examples run in local mode and SpectralK still has the same file path problem I reported earlier. The 20 newsgroups example runs on MapR but still gets the version mismatch error on my CDH3 cluster. So no changes since take 2 but these don't seem like showstoppers to me.
+1 for take 3
-----Original Message-----
From: Dmitriy Lyubimov [mailto:dlieu.7@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 11:50 AM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
For what it's worth i can add +1 but on the same basis i did it
before take 3. I won't be able to verify any of these new problems any
time soon.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> Will try to get you one today :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:59 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>
> Legally, we need 3 +1's on this thread on this RC.
>
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
>> I did some cluster testing of take 2 and only found one potential issue surfaced by an example that is broken. Haven't waded through the 100+ postings since I got back last night, but it looked good to me then.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:04 AM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>>
>> I am rushing around clearing the decks for my trip to Europe, but I very
>> much hope to take a gander today.
>>
>> Over the weekend, I did use the trunk distribution with good results. I
>> didn't get the map-reduce stuff going since I was focussed on SGD work.
>> There is a possible niggling issue with SGD, but should not hold up the
>> release.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s carry
>>> over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC. *Do*
>>> have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great to
>>> finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Looking now.
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Dmitriy Lyubimov <dl...@gmail.com>.
For what it's worth i can add +1 but on the same basis i did it
before take 3. I won't be able to verify any of these new problems any
time soon.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> Will try to get you one today :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:59 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>
> Legally, we need 3 +1's on this thread on this RC.
>
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
>> I did some cluster testing of take 2 and only found one potential issue surfaced by an example that is broken. Haven't waded through the 100+ postings since I got back last night, but it looked good to me then.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:04 AM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>>
>> I am rushing around clearing the decks for my trip to Europe, but I very
>> much hope to take a gander today.
>>
>> Over the weekend, I did use the trunk distribution with good results. I
>> didn't get the map-reduce stuff going since I was focussed on SGD work.
>> There is a possible niggling issue with SGD, but should not hold up the
>> release.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s carry
>>> over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC. *Do*
>>> have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great to
>>> finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready.
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>> > Looking now.
>>>
>>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Jeff Eastman <je...@Narus.com>.
Will try to get you one today :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Benson Margulies [mailto:bimargulies@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:59 AM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Legally, we need 3 +1's on this thread on this RC.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> I did some cluster testing of take 2 and only found one potential issue surfaced by an example that is broken. Haven't waded through the 100+ postings since I got back last night, but it looked good to me then.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:04 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>
> I am rushing around clearing the decks for my trip to Europe, but I very
> much hope to take a gander today.
>
> Over the weekend, I did use the trunk distribution with good results. I
> didn't get the map-reduce stuff going since I was focussed on SGD work.
> There is a possible niggling issue with SGD, but should not hold up the
> release.
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s carry
>> over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC. *Do*
>> have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great to
>> finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready.
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Looking now.
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Legally, we need 3 +1's on this thread on this RC.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Eastman <je...@narus.com> wrote:
> I did some cluster testing of take 2 and only found one potential issue surfaced by an example that is broken. Haven't waded through the 100+ postings since I got back last night, but it looked good to me then.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:04 AM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
>
> I am rushing around clearing the decks for my trip to Europe, but I very
> much hope to take a gander today.
>
> Over the weekend, I did use the trunk distribution with good results. I
> didn't get the map-reduce stuff going since I was focussed on SGD work.
> There is a possible niggling issue with SGD, but should not hold up the
> release.
>
> +1
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s carry
>> over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC. *Do*
>> have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great to
>> finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready.
>>
>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
>> >wrote:
>>
>> > Looking now.
>>
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Jeff Eastman <je...@Narus.com>.
I did some cluster testing of take 2 and only found one potential issue surfaced by an example that is broken. Haven't waded through the 100+ postings since I got back last night, but it looked good to me then.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Dunning [mailto:ted.dunning@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:04 AM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
I am rushing around clearing the decks for my trip to Europe, but I very
much hope to take a gander today.
Over the weekend, I did use the trunk distribution with good results. I
didn't get the map-reduce stuff going since I was focussed on SGD work.
There is a possible niggling issue with SGD, but should not hold up the
release.
+1
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s carry
> over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC. *Do*
> have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great to
> finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready.
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Looking now.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>.
I am rushing around clearing the decks for my trip to Europe, but I very
much hope to take a gander today.
Over the weekend, I did use the trunk distribution with good results. I
didn't get the map-reduce stuff going since I was focussed on SGD work.
There is a possible niggling issue with SGD, but should not hold up the
release.
+1
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s carry
> over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC. *Do*
> have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great to
> finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready.
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsingers@apache.org
> >wrote:
>
> > Looking now.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s carry
over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC. *Do*
have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great to
finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>wrote:
> Looking now.
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Grant Ingersoll <gs...@apache.org>.
Looking now.
On May 31, 2011, at 4:31 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> Going once, going twice... going to complete the release later this evening.
> I'm guessing anyone who cares to look and check has done so already.
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-014
>>
>> This has the fix for Jeff's issue, and I believe I took a good swipe at
>> cleaning up license issues -- and did get it to put the NOTICE.txt and
>> LICENSE.txt in the top-level in all distro artifacts as expected.
>>
>> Have another look; targeting release for Tuesday if all is well.
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3
Posted by Sean Owen <sr...@apache.org>.
Going once, going twice... going to complete the release later this evening.
I'm guessing anyone who cares to look and check has done so already.
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Sean Owen <sr...@apache.org> wrote:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-014
>
> This has the fix for Jeff's issue, and I believe I took a good swipe at
> cleaning up license issues -- and did get it to put the NOTICE.txt and
> LICENSE.txt in the top-level in all distro artifacts as expected.
>
> Have another look; targeting release for Tuesday if all is well.
>