You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/08/06 22:15:47 UTC

[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #25229: [SPARK-27900][K8s] Add jvm oom flag

dongjoon-hyun edited a comment on issue #25229: [SPARK-27900][K8s] Add jvm oom flag
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25229#issuecomment-518863944
 
 
   Hmm. I got it.
   
   That rang me [my original question](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/25229#pullrequestreview-267298632) again. If the users supply `spark.driver.extraJavaOptions`, why do we try to enforce this by Spark-side?
   >  Right now user supplied spark.driver.extraJavaOptions will be ignored because they are part of a properties files
   
   For me, the documentation update seems to be enough. How do you think about that? Did I miss something?

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org