You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@gora.apache.org by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com> on 2013/05/03 20:34:23 UTC
[DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Hi All,
It came to me last night...
Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In my
opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is also
good that we already know what is in the next development drive. Should we
need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed in
0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC perspective.
I actually think it would be something really productive and beneficial for
us.
Thanks, have a great weekend.
Lewis
--
*Lewis*
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
No worries Henry! Just clarifying and all :)
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
Date: Friday, May 3, 2013 2:29 PM
To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
>Hey Chris, thanks for the clarification. Yeah, sorry about using word
>"vote".
>
>I meant to ask Alfonso about potential blocker other than GORA-174 to
>release 0.3 RC.
>
>
>
>- Henry
>
>
>On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) <
>chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> This isn't a VOTE it's a discussion. Furthemore, we can't VETO (-1)
>> intent :) This is a discussion of an *intent* to make an RC.
>>
>> If Lewis gets around to it, throws it up, the RC is subject to
>> procedural, majority rules VOTE'ing.
>>
>> I think Alfonso is just expressing his desire that he would like
>> to comment on something RE: the RC. So please Alfonso, send in
>> your comments, but Lewis is also free (as is anybody) to create an
>> RC -- then -- when a VOTE is called, that's a VOTE :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chirs
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
>> Date: Friday, May 3, 2013 12:33 PM
>> To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
>>
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >-1 (so a net of +2 by now).
>> >I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
>> >conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
>> >
>> >Best,
>> >
>> >Alfonso Nishikawa
>> >
>> >
>> >2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> Hi Lewis,
>> >>
>> >> +1 !!!
>> >>
>> >> "Release early. Release often."
>> >> (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
>> >>
>> >> I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
>> >> feedback from the community.
>> >>
>> >> --Roland
>> >>
>> >> Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
>> >> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi All,
>> >> > It came to me last night...
>> >> > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
>> >> > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174
>>are
>> >> > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk.
>>In
>> >>my
>> >> > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is
>> >>also
>> >> > good that we already know what is in the next development drive.
>> >>Should
>> >> we
>> >> > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we
>>missed
>> >>in
>> >> > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
>> >> > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
>> >> perspective.
>> >> > I actually think it would be something really productive and
>> >>beneficial
>> >> for
>> >> > us.
>> >> > Thanks, have a great weekend.
>> >> > Lewis
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > *Lewis*
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in
>>the
>> >morning."
>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Hey Chris, thanks for the clarification. Yeah, sorry about using word
"vote".
I meant to ask Alfonso about potential blocker other than GORA-174 to
release 0.3 RC.
- Henry
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) <
chris.a.mattmann@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> This isn't a VOTE it's a discussion. Furthemore, we can't VETO (-1)
> intent :) This is a discussion of an *intent* to make an RC.
>
> If Lewis gets around to it, throws it up, the RC is subject to
> procedural, majority rules VOTE'ing.
>
> I think Alfonso is just expressing his desire that he would like
> to comment on something RE: the RC. So please Alfonso, send in
> your comments, but Lewis is also free (as is anybody) to create an
> RC -- then -- when a VOTE is called, that's a VOTE :)
>
> Cheers,
> Chirs
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
> Date: Friday, May 3, 2013 12:33 PM
> To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >-1 (so a net of +2 by now).
> >I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
> >conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
> >
> >Best,
> >
> >Alfonso Nishikawa
> >
> >
> >2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Hi Lewis,
> >>
> >> +1 !!!
> >>
> >> "Release early. Release often."
> >> (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
> >>
> >> I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
> >> feedback from the community.
> >>
> >> --Roland
> >>
> >> Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
> >> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> > Hi All,
> >> > It came to me last night...
> >> > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
> >> > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
> >> > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In
> >>my
> >> > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is
> >>also
> >> > good that we already know what is in the next development drive.
> >>Should
> >> we
> >> > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed
> >>in
> >> > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
> >> > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
> >> perspective.
> >> > I actually think it would be something really productive and
> >>beneficial
> >> for
> >> > us.
> >> > Thanks, have a great weekend.
> >> > Lewis
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > *Lewis*
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
> >morning."
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hey Alfonso,
No worries! Rock on!
Cheers,
Chris
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
Date: Friday, May 3, 2013 2:15 PM
To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
>Hi Mattmann,
>Perfect :)
>I took for granted that it was going to be created since I have no actual
>formal proofs :P
>I would want to clarify that I was not veting. In fact, I never knew I had
>that possibility (and if I have it, I read and I ignored that).
>
>Thanks!
>
>Best,
>
>Alfonso Nishikawa
>
>2013/5/3 Mattmann, Chris A (398J) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> This isn't a VOTE it's a discussion. Furthemore, we can't VETO (-1)
>> intent :) This is a discussion of an *intent* to make an RC.
>>
>> If Lewis gets around to it, throws it up, the RC is subject to
>> procedural, majority rules VOTE'ing.
>>
>> I think Alfonso is just expressing his desire that he would like
>> to comment on something RE: the RC. So please Alfonso, send in
>> your comments, but Lewis is also free (as is anybody) to create an
>> RC -- then -- when a VOTE is called, that's a VOTE :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Chirs
>>
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
>> Senior Computer Scientist
>> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
>> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
>> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
>> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>
>> Reply-To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
>> Date: Friday, May 3, 2013 12:33 PM
>> To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
>>
>> >Hi all,
>> >
>> >-1 (so a net of +2 by now).
>> >I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
>> >conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
>> >
>> >Best,
>> >
>> >Alfonso Nishikawa
>> >
>> >
>> >2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> >> Hi Lewis,
>> >>
>> >> +1 !!!
>> >>
>> >> "Release early. Release often."
>> >> (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
>> >>
>> >> I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
>> >> feedback from the community.
>> >>
>> >> --Roland
>> >>
>> >> Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
>> >> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
>> >> >
>> >> > Hi All,
>> >> > It came to me last night...
>> >> > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
>> >> > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174
>>are
>> >> > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk.
>>In
>> >>my
>> >> > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is
>> >>also
>> >> > good that we already know what is in the next development drive.
>> >>Should
>> >> we
>> >> > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we
>>missed
>> >>in
>> >> > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
>> >> > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
>> >> perspective.
>> >> > I actually think it would be something really productive and
>> >>beneficial
>> >> for
>> >> > us.
>> >> > Thanks, have a great weekend.
>> >> > Lewis
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > *Lewis*
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >--
>> >"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in
>>the
>> >morning."
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
>morning."
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mattmann,
Perfect :)
I took for granted that it was going to be created since I have no actual
formal proofs :P
I would want to clarify that I was not veting. In fact, I never knew I had
that possibility (and if I have it, I read and I ignored that).
Thanks!
Best,
Alfonso Nishikawa
2013/5/3 Mattmann, Chris A (398J) <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>
> Hi Guys,
>
> This isn't a VOTE it's a discussion. Furthemore, we can't VETO (-1)
> intent :) This is a discussion of an *intent* to make an RC.
>
> If Lewis gets around to it, throws it up, the RC is subject to
> procedural, majority rules VOTE'ing.
>
> I think Alfonso is just expressing his desire that he would like
> to comment on something RE: the RC. So please Alfonso, send in
> your comments, but Lewis is also free (as is anybody) to create an
> RC -- then -- when a VOTE is called, that's a VOTE :)
>
> Cheers,
> Chirs
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Senior Computer Scientist
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
> Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
> Date: Friday, May 3, 2013 12:33 PM
> To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
>
> >Hi all,
> >
> >-1 (so a net of +2 by now).
> >I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
> >conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
> >
> >Best,
> >
> >Alfonso Nishikawa
> >
> >
> >2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Hi Lewis,
> >>
> >> +1 !!!
> >>
> >> "Release early. Release often."
> >> (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
> >>
> >> I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
> >> feedback from the community.
> >>
> >> --Roland
> >>
> >> Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
> >> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
> >> >
> >> > Hi All,
> >> > It came to me last night...
> >> > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
> >> > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
> >> > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In
> >>my
> >> > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is
> >>also
> >> > good that we already know what is in the next development drive.
> >>Should
> >> we
> >> > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed
> >>in
> >> > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
> >> > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
> >> perspective.
> >> > I actually think it would be something really productive and
> >>beneficial
> >> for
> >> > us.
> >> > Thanks, have a great weekend.
> >> > Lewis
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > *Lewis*
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
> >morning."
>
>
--
"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
morning."
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo <re...@gmail.com>.
Hi Lewis,
+1 from me as well
I know there are several things within GORA-174 but I think we should
consider issue priorities for releases. I mean we started GORA-174 for
patching NUTCH-1477 and IMHO we have accomplished that. Sure there are
a lot of new features related to GORA-174, but we should keep on
moving (:
Renato M.
2013/5/3 Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> -1 (so a net of +2 by now).
> I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
> conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
>
> Best,
>
> Alfonso Nishikawa
>
>
> 2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi Lewis,
>>
>> +1 !!!
>>
>> "Release early. Release often."
>> (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
>>
>> I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
>> feedback from the community.
>>
>> --Roland
>>
>> Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
>> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> > It came to me last night...
>> > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
>> > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
>> > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In my
>> > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is also
>> > good that we already know what is in the next development drive. Should
>> we
>> > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed in
>> > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
>> > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
>> perspective.
>> > I actually think it would be something really productive and beneficial
>> for
>> > us.
>> > Thanks, have a great weekend.
>> > Lewis
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Lewis*
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
> morning."
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>.
Hi Renato,
I appreciate your willingness. I will study it close to see if I find
reasons to propose something for Gora 0.4 :)
So, finally this gets out of this discussion :)
Thanks!
Best,
Alfonso Nishikawa
2013/5/3 Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo <re...@gmail.com>
> I am a +1 with Alfonso in discussing Gora-103, there are somethings
> that seemed like a good idea at the time, but I was developing some
> simple tests and there are just something within it that I am not sure
> how to address nor solve.
> Maybe we can put it as blocker for Gora 0.4 Alfonso? so we don't
> forget about it (:
>
> Renato M.
>
> 2013/5/3 Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>:
> > Hi, Henry.
> >
> > It's all regarding to the state after GORA-103, but I have to analyze
> > further and deeper to show points of discussion :\ I found a change in
> > architecture that really does not convince me at all (I had problems
> mergin
> > Pig module from 0.2.1 that put me in that trail).
> > Sadly, fully write a proof takes time and I am a slow man :P. Since my
> "-1"
> > really does not affect the poll, never mind :)
> > I will write that all later :\
> >
> > Another point is things like the lack of documentation, formal definition
> > of mappings, etc... maybe that can go for later versions.
> > By now I only have the reason of being conservative (yeah, I am much
> about
> > software), since I don't have prepared arguments (more thant intuition)
> :\
> > If someone is really interested, I can dedicate special and precious time
> > to investigate it (hope my friends and relatives will not kill me ;).
> >
> > With Renato this is a +3.
> > Your vote?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Alfonso Nishikawa
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/5/3 Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Hi Alfonso,
> >>
> >> What are the blockers for the -1 vote for releasing 0.3 RC? I know
> GORA-174
> >> is important but is it blocker for Nutch integration?
> >>
> >> - Henry
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Alfonso Nishikawa <
> >> alfonso.nishikawa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > -1 (so a net of +2 by now).
> >> > I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
> >> > conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
> >> >
> >> > Best,
> >> >
> >> > Alfonso Nishikawa
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > 2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Lewis,
> >> > >
> >> > > +1 !!!
> >> > >
> >> > > "Release early. Release often."
> >> > > (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
> >> > >
> >> > > I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
> >> > > feedback from the community.
> >> > >
> >> > > --Roland
> >> > >
> >> > > Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
> >> > > lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Hi All,
> >> > > > It came to me last night...
> >> > > > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
> >> > > > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174
> are
> >> > > > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk.
> In
> >> my
> >> > > > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It
> is
> >> > also
> >> > > > good that we already know what is in the next development drive.
> >> Should
> >> > > we
> >> > > > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we
> missed
> >> in
> >> > > > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
> >> > > > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
> >> > > perspective.
> >> > > > I actually think it would be something really productive and
> >> beneficial
> >> > > for
> >> > > > us.
> >> > > > Thanks, have a great weekend.
> >> > > > Lewis
> >> > > >
> >> > > > --
> >> > > > *Lewis*
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in
> the
> >> > morning."
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
> > morning."
>
--
"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
morning."
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Renato Marroquín Mogrovejo <re...@gmail.com>.
I am a +1 with Alfonso in discussing Gora-103, there are somethings
that seemed like a good idea at the time, but I was developing some
simple tests and there are just something within it that I am not sure
how to address nor solve.
Maybe we can put it as blocker for Gora 0.4 Alfonso? so we don't
forget about it (:
Renato M.
2013/5/3 Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>:
> Hi, Henry.
>
> It's all regarding to the state after GORA-103, but I have to analyze
> further and deeper to show points of discussion :\ I found a change in
> architecture that really does not convince me at all (I had problems mergin
> Pig module from 0.2.1 that put me in that trail).
> Sadly, fully write a proof takes time and I am a slow man :P. Since my "-1"
> really does not affect the poll, never mind :)
> I will write that all later :\
>
> Another point is things like the lack of documentation, formal definition
> of mappings, etc... maybe that can go for later versions.
> By now I only have the reason of being conservative (yeah, I am much about
> software), since I don't have prepared arguments (more thant intuition) :\
> If someone is really interested, I can dedicate special and precious time
> to investigate it (hope my friends and relatives will not kill me ;).
>
> With Renato this is a +3.
> Your vote?
>
> Best,
>
> Alfonso Nishikawa
>
>
>
> 2013/5/3 Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi Alfonso,
>>
>> What are the blockers for the -1 vote for releasing 0.3 RC? I know GORA-174
>> is important but is it blocker for Nutch integration?
>>
>> - Henry
>>
>>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Alfonso Nishikawa <
>> alfonso.nishikawa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > -1 (so a net of +2 by now).
>> > I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
>> > conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
>> >
>> > Best,
>> >
>> > Alfonso Nishikawa
>> >
>> >
>> > 2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
>> >
>> > > Hi Lewis,
>> > >
>> > > +1 !!!
>> > >
>> > > "Release early. Release often."
>> > > (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
>> > >
>> > > I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
>> > > feedback from the community.
>> > >
>> > > --Roland
>> > >
>> > > Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
>> > > lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi All,
>> > > > It came to me last night...
>> > > > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
>> > > > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
>> > > > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In
>> my
>> > > > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is
>> > also
>> > > > good that we already know what is in the next development drive.
>> Should
>> > > we
>> > > > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed
>> in
>> > > > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
>> > > > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
>> > > perspective.
>> > > > I actually think it would be something really productive and
>> beneficial
>> > > for
>> > > > us.
>> > > > Thanks, have a great weekend.
>> > > > Lewis
>> > > >
>> > > > --
>> > > > *Lewis*
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
>> > morning."
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
> morning."
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Henry.
It's related to design introduced in that patch and some implications. I
have to study it close :\
I am already convinced that it is not important for this discussion ;P
Best,
Alfonso Nishikawa
2013/5/3 Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
> Hi Alfonso,
>
> Thanks for clarifying it.
>
> But Gora-103 is for dynamo-db module isnt it:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-103
>
> It has and passes the latest unit tests.
>
>
> - Henry
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Alfonso Nishikawa <
> alfonso.nishikawa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Henry.
> >
> > It's all regarding to the state after GORA-103, but I have to analyze
> > further and deeper to show points of discussion :\ I found a change in
> > architecture that really does not convince me at all (I had problems
> mergin
> > Pig module from 0.2.1 that put me in that trail).
> > Sadly, fully write a proof takes time and I am a slow man :P. Since my
> "-1"
> > really does not affect the poll, never mind :)
> > I will write that all later :\
> >
> > Another point is things like the lack of documentation, formal definition
> > of mappings, etc... maybe that can go for later versions.
> > By now I only have the reason of being conservative (yeah, I am much
> about
> > software), since I don't have prepared arguments (more thant intuition)
> :\
> > If someone is really interested, I can dedicate special and precious time
> > to investigate it (hope my friends and relatives will not kill me ;).
> >
> > With Renato this is a +3.
> > Your vote?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Alfonso Nishikawa
> >
> >
> >
> > 2013/5/3 Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hi Alfonso,
> > >
> > > What are the blockers for the -1 vote for releasing 0.3 RC? I know
> > GORA-174
> > > is important but is it blocker for Nutch integration?
> > >
> > > - Henry
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Alfonso Nishikawa <
> > > alfonso.nishikawa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > -1 (so a net of +2 by now).
> > > > I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
> > > > conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > >
> > > > Alfonso Nishikawa
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Lewis,
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 !!!
> > > > >
> > > > > "Release early. Release often."
> > > > > (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
> > > > >
> > > > > I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
> > > > > feedback from the community.
> > > > >
> > > > > --Roland
> > > > >
> > > > > Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
> > > > > lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > > It came to me last night...
> > > > > > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
> > > > > > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174
> > are
> > > > > > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk.
> > In
> > > my
> > > > > > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It
> is
> > > > also
> > > > > > good that we already know what is in the next development drive.
> > > Should
> > > > > we
> > > > > > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we
> > missed
> > > in
> > > > > > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
> > > > > > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
> > > > > perspective.
> > > > > > I actually think it would be something really productive and
> > > beneficial
> > > > > for
> > > > > > us.
> > > > > > Thanks, have a great weekend.
> > > > > > Lewis
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > *Lewis*
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in
> > the
> > > > morning."
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
> > morning."
> >
>
--
"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
morning."
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi Alfonso,
Thanks for clarifying it.
But Gora-103 is for dynamo-db module isnt it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GORA-103
It has and passes the latest unit tests.
- Henry
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Alfonso Nishikawa <
alfonso.nishikawa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Henry.
>
> It's all regarding to the state after GORA-103, but I have to analyze
> further and deeper to show points of discussion :\ I found a change in
> architecture that really does not convince me at all (I had problems mergin
> Pig module from 0.2.1 that put me in that trail).
> Sadly, fully write a proof takes time and I am a slow man :P. Since my "-1"
> really does not affect the poll, never mind :)
> I will write that all later :\
>
> Another point is things like the lack of documentation, formal definition
> of mappings, etc... maybe that can go for later versions.
> By now I only have the reason of being conservative (yeah, I am much about
> software), since I don't have prepared arguments (more thant intuition) :\
> If someone is really interested, I can dedicate special and precious time
> to investigate it (hope my friends and relatives will not kill me ;).
>
> With Renato this is a +3.
> Your vote?
>
> Best,
>
> Alfonso Nishikawa
>
>
>
> 2013/5/3 Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi Alfonso,
> >
> > What are the blockers for the -1 vote for releasing 0.3 RC? I know
> GORA-174
> > is important but is it blocker for Nutch integration?
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Alfonso Nishikawa <
> > alfonso.nishikawa@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > -1 (so a net of +2 by now).
> > > I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
> > > conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
> > >
> > > Best,
> > >
> > > Alfonso Nishikawa
> > >
> > >
> > > 2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > Hi Lewis,
> > > >
> > > > +1 !!!
> > > >
> > > > "Release early. Release often."
> > > > (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
> > > >
> > > > I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
> > > > feedback from the community.
> > > >
> > > > --Roland
> > > >
> > > > Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
> > > > lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi All,
> > > > > It came to me last night...
> > > > > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
> > > > > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174
> are
> > > > > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk.
> In
> > my
> > > > > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is
> > > also
> > > > > good that we already know what is in the next development drive.
> > Should
> > > > we
> > > > > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we
> missed
> > in
> > > > > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
> > > > > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
> > > > perspective.
> > > > > I actually think it would be something really productive and
> > beneficial
> > > > for
> > > > > us.
> > > > > Thanks, have a great weekend.
> > > > > Lewis
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Lewis*
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in
> the
> > > morning."
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
> morning."
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Henry.
It's all regarding to the state after GORA-103, but I have to analyze
further and deeper to show points of discussion :\ I found a change in
architecture that really does not convince me at all (I had problems mergin
Pig module from 0.2.1 that put me in that trail).
Sadly, fully write a proof takes time and I am a slow man :P. Since my "-1"
really does not affect the poll, never mind :)
I will write that all later :\
Another point is things like the lack of documentation, formal definition
of mappings, etc... maybe that can go for later versions.
By now I only have the reason of being conservative (yeah, I am much about
software), since I don't have prepared arguments (more thant intuition) :\
If someone is really interested, I can dedicate special and precious time
to investigate it (hope my friends and relatives will not kill me ;).
With Renato this is a +3.
Your vote?
Best,
Alfonso Nishikawa
2013/5/3 Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>
> Hi Alfonso,
>
> What are the blockers for the -1 vote for releasing 0.3 RC? I know GORA-174
> is important but is it blocker for Nutch integration?
>
> - Henry
>
>
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Alfonso Nishikawa <
> alfonso.nishikawa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > -1 (so a net of +2 by now).
> > I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
> > conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Alfonso Nishikawa
> >
> >
> > 2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > Hi Lewis,
> > >
> > > +1 !!!
> > >
> > > "Release early. Release often."
> > > (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
> > >
> > > I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
> > > feedback from the community.
> > >
> > > --Roland
> > >
> > > Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
> > > lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > > It came to me last night...
> > > > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
> > > > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
> > > > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In
> my
> > > > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is
> > also
> > > > good that we already know what is in the next development drive.
> Should
> > > we
> > > > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed
> in
> > > > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
> > > > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
> > > perspective.
> > > > I actually think it would be something really productive and
> beneficial
> > > for
> > > > us.
> > > > Thanks, have a great weekend.
> > > > Lewis
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > *Lewis*
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
> > morning."
> >
>
--
"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
morning."
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
Hi Alfonso,
What are the blockers for the -1 vote for releasing 0.3 RC? I know GORA-174
is important but is it blocker for Nutch integration?
- Henry
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Alfonso Nishikawa <
alfonso.nishikawa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> -1 (so a net of +2 by now).
> I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
> conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
>
> Best,
>
> Alfonso Nishikawa
>
>
> 2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
>
> > Hi Lewis,
> >
> > +1 !!!
> >
> > "Release early. Release often."
> > (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
> >
> > I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
> > feedback from the community.
> >
> > --Roland
> >
> > Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
> > lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > > It came to me last night...
> > > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
> > > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
> > > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In my
> > > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is
> also
> > > good that we already know what is in the next development drive. Should
> > we
> > > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed in
> > > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
> > > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
> > perspective.
> > > I actually think it would be something really productive and beneficial
> > for
> > > us.
> > > Thanks, have a great weekend.
> > > Lewis
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Lewis*
> >
>
>
>
> --
> "Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
> morning."
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
Hi Guys,
This isn't a VOTE it's a discussion. Furthemore, we can't VETO (-1)
intent :) This is a discussion of an *intent* to make an RC.
If Lewis gets around to it, throws it up, the RC is subject to
procedural, majority rules VOTE'ing.
I think Alfonso is just expressing his desire that he would like
to comment on something RE: the RC. So please Alfonso, send in
your comments, but Lewis is also free (as is anybody) to create an
RC -- then -- when a VOTE is called, that's a VOTE :)
Cheers,
Chirs
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
Date: Friday, May 3, 2013 12:33 PM
To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
>Hi all,
>
>-1 (so a net of +2 by now).
>I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
>conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
>
>Best,
>
>Alfonso Nishikawa
>
>
>2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi Lewis,
>>
>> +1 !!!
>>
>> "Release early. Release often."
>> (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
>>
>> I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
>> feedback from the community.
>>
>> --Roland
>>
>> Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
>> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > Hi All,
>> > It came to me last night...
>> > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
>> > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
>> > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In
>>my
>> > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is
>>also
>> > good that we already know what is in the next development drive.
>>Should
>> we
>> > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed
>>in
>> > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
>> > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
>> perspective.
>> > I actually think it would be something really productive and
>>beneficial
>> for
>> > us.
>> > Thanks, have a great weekend.
>> > Lewis
>> >
>> > --
>> > *Lewis*
>>
>
>
>
>--
>"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
>morning."
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Alfonso Nishikawa <al...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
-1 (so a net of +2 by now).
I have some comments but have to write up them :P (I know am much
conservative about releases - luckily this is a vote :)
Best,
Alfonso Nishikawa
2013/5/3 Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>
> Hi Lewis,
>
> +1 !!!
>
> "Release early. Release often."
> (Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
>
> I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
> feedback from the community.
>
> --Roland
>
> Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi All,
> > It came to me last night...
> > Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
> > We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
> > ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In my
> > opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is also
> > good that we already know what is in the next development drive. Should
> we
> > need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed in
> > 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
> > I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC
> perspective.
> > I actually think it would be something really productive and beneficial
> for
> > us.
> > Thanks, have a great weekend.
> > Lewis
> >
> > --
> > *Lewis*
>
--
"Drinking bloody marys all night will make you feel like a corpse in the
morning."
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by Roland von Herget <ro...@gmail.com>.
Hi Lewis,
+1 !!!
"Release early. Release often."
(Eric S. Raymond - The Cathedral and the Bazaar)
I think thats absolutly true and helps a lot, e.g. for getting more
feedback from the community.
--Roland
Am 03.05.2013 20:34 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <
lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi All,
> It came to me last night...
> Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
> We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
> ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In my
> opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is also
> good that we already know what is in the next development drive. Should we
> need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed in
> 0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
> I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC perspective.
> I actually think it would be something really productive and beneficial
for
> us.
> Thanks, have a great weekend.
> Lewis
>
> --
> *Lewis*
Re: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
Posted by "Mattmann, Chris A (398J)" <ch...@jpl.nasa.gov>.
+5000 happy to reviewŠ
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: chris.a.mattmann@nasa.gov
WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
-----Original Message-----
From: Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: "dev@gora.apache.org" <de...@gora.apache.org>
Date: Friday, May 3, 2013 11:34 AM
To: "<de...@gora.apache.org>" <de...@gora.apache.org>
Subject: [DISCUSS] Push RC for Gora 0.3
>Hi All,
>It came to me last night...
>Why don't we just push Gora 0.3 RC right now?
>We could wait another while until all of the issues with GORA-174 are
>ironed out. This should not prevent us from releasing Gora trunk. In my
>opinion Gora trunk is certainly stable enough to be released. It is also
>good that we already know what is in the next development drive. Should we
>need to release a point oh oh release to pick up something we missed in
>0.3, then I can push this as well no bother at all.
>I am easily able to do this if I get the thumbs up from a PMC perspective.
>I actually think it would be something really productive and beneficial
>for
>us.
>Thanks, have a great weekend.
>Lewis
>
>--
>*Lewis*