LOCAL cache

[Andrey Kornev <an...@hotmail.com>]

Hello,


It appears that a LOCAL cache gets created on all cluster nodes despite it being LOCAL. In other words, a call to Ignite.getOrCreateCache(...) results in the cache started on all nodes:


3871 [exchange-worker-#74%Node1%] INFO GridCacheProcessor - Started cache [name=myCache, mode=LOCAL]
3871 [exchange-worker-#33%Node0%] INFO GridCacheProcessor - Started cache [name=myCache, mode=LOCAL]


Why? I find it counter intuitive, and rather redundant - I don't want the creation of a LOCAL cache on a one node to result in the same cache getting created on all other cluster nodes. I really think that creation of a LOCAL cache should be a node local operation. Each node will create its own LOCAL cache instance when it needs it.


Can anyone shed some light on the rationale behind such design?


Thanks

Andrey

Re: LOCAL cache

[Valentin Kulichenko <va...@gmail.com>]

Hi Andrey,

It seems to me that LOCAL cache simply doesn't have any special handling
here and therefore works in the same way as distributed caches do. I tend
to agree that this is incorrect, can you please create a ticket?

-Val

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Andrey Kornev <an...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
> It appears that a LOCAL cache gets created on all cluster nodes despite it
> being LOCAL. In other words, a call to Ignite.getOrCreateCache(...) results
> in the cache started on all nodes:
>
>
> 3871 [exchange-worker-#74%Node1%] INFO GridCacheProcessor - Started cache
> [name=myCache, mode=LOCAL]
> 3871 [exchange-worker-#33%Node0%] INFO GridCacheProcessor - Started cache
> [name=myCache, mode=LOCAL]
>
>
> Why? I find it counter intuitive, and rather redundant - I don't want the
> creation of a LOCAL cache on a one node to result in the same cache getting
> created on all other cluster nodes. I really think that creation of a LOCAL
> cache should be a node local operation. Each node will create its own LOCAL
> cache instance when it needs it.
>
>
> Can anyone shed some light on the rationale behind such design?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Andrey
>