You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@ant.apache.org by Gerald Gutierrez <gg...@emobiledata.com> on 2000/07/31 23:28:09 UTC

filtering on javac, and VssGet

	
The @keyword@ filtering ... The documentation seems to indicate that I can 
do filtering when compiling because there is a "filtering" attribute on 
javac but I can't seem to get it working. Is there an example of this 
somewhere?

Also .. the documentation indicates that there is a VssGet command, but 
doing ant -verbose doesn't list VssGet as an option. I'm using Windows 2000 
with VSS and so would like to use this option, but cannot right now.

If someone can lend a hand, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.


Re: filtering on javac, and VssGet

Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@bost.de>.
>>>>> "GG" == Gerald Gutierrez <gg...@emobiledata.com> writes:

 GG> The documentation seems to indicate that I can do filtering when
 GG> compiling because there is a "filtering" attribute on javac but I
 GG> can't seem to get it working. Is there an example of this
 GG> somewhere?

Actually only the copyied support files were filetered, the .java
files themselves stayed untouched. Since this behavior (copying of
support files) has been removed in the latest CVS version the
filtering attribute won't be there in the future as well.

 GG> Also .. the documentation indicates that there is a VssGet

The tasks name is vssget and it should be included with Ant 1.1 - I
can't really check whether it works as I'm not using VSS myself.

By default all task names are lowercase only.

Stefan

RE: filtering on javac, and VssGet

Posted by Ken Liu <kl...@auctionlogic.com>.
The VssGet is included in the Ant 1.1 dist but is included in the
optional.jar.

Ken


> Also .. the documentation indicates that there is a VssGet command, but
> doing ant -verbose doesn't list VssGet as an option. I'm using
> Windows 2000
> with VSS and so would like to use this option, but cannot right now.
>
> If someone can lend a hand, I'd appreciate it. Thanks.
>
>