You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com> on 2011/01/06 18:47:29 UTC
Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
All,
Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
now are exactly what we need to do that.
Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
needs for completing that proposal are:
- Build Initial Committers list
- Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
- Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
The current draft of the proposal is located at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
For each of those goals:
Build Initial Committers List
-------------------------------------------
I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
- Chris Currens
- DIGY
- Michael Herndon
- Prescott Nasser
- Scott Lombard
- Sergey Mirvoda
- Troy Howard
The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
message indicating your interest.
Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
Contributors (alphabetical):
- Alex Thompson
- Ben Martz
- Frank Yu
- Glyn Darkin
- Peter Mateja
- Shashi Kant
- Simone Chiaretta
- Wyatt Barnett
Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
to do so by the end of the week.
Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
list expressing your concerns or ideas.
I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
around this project and the effort and investments that have been
given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
The project could not survive without it.
Thanks,
Troy
RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by "Lombard, Scott" <sl...@KINGINDUSTRIES.COM>.
Troy,
The proposal looks very good. Thank you for all your hard work. I only have one comment in your Initial Goals section. Given the stated completed before Feb 2011 timeframe I fee we may want to be more clear on the bullet "Create a well documented repeatable and fully automated language porting process" by changing the text to something like "Agree upon a method for creating a well documented repeatable and fully automated language porting process" to better describe the community discussion that will happen as part of this process.
Thanks,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 12:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
All,
Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
now are exactly what we need to do that.
Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
needs for completing that proposal are:
- Build Initial Committers list
- Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
- Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
The current draft of the proposal is located at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
For each of those goals:
Build Initial Committers List
-------------------------------------------
I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
- Chris Currens
- DIGY
- Michael Herndon
- Prescott Nasser
- Scott Lombard
- Sergey Mirvoda
- Troy Howard
The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
message indicating your interest.
Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
Contributors (alphabetical):
- Alex Thompson
- Ben Martz
- Frank Yu
- Glyn Darkin
- Peter Mateja
- Shashi Kant
- Simone Chiaretta
- Wyatt Barnett
Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
to do so by the end of the week.
Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
list expressing your concerns or ideas.
I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
around this project and the effort and investments that have been
given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
The project could not survive without it.
Thanks,
Troy
This message (and any associated files) is intended only for the
use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may
contain information that is confidential, subject to copyright or
constitutes a trade secret. If you are not the intended recipient
you are hereby notified that any dissemination, copying or
distribution of this message, or files associated with this message,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting
it from your computer. Thank you, King Industries, Inc.
Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good. I'll finalize this tonight and get it submitted.
Missing personal info can be updated post-submission. It's not a big deal.
I apologize for being relatively quiet on other mailing list
issues/project work last week. Day job as been *absurdly* busy.
Thanks,
Troy
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sergey also needs to submit his, and I'm guessing that Troy & Mike need to get a corporate CLA submitted as well (not sure if maybe this has been done)
> The other thing is Digy and Sergey needs to update the Core Developer section with their information. I think if you don't want to explain much about yourself a generic sentence is alright - that's more or less what I put.
>
> Other than that looks good to me at this point
> ~Prescott
>
>
>
>
>> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:58:30 -0500
>> Subject: Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
>> From: mherndon@o19s.com
>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>>
>> I'll be faxing my cla off probably by tomorrow night.
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I think there are some misunderstandings about how to contribute to
>> > Lucene.Net.
>> > Everyone is free to grab to source code, work on it and post the
>> > bugs/improvements/new features. They are always welcomed.
>> >
>> > DIGY
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: srikalyan swayampakula [mailto:srikalyansswayam@hotmail.com]
>> > Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 11:13 PM
>> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > Subject: RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
>> >
>> >
>> > Hi Everyone,
>> > I would like to be a contributor for this project. Is
>> > there any chance to be one as I believe you have already decided on the
>> > list
>> > of people.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > ~Sri.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > From: digydigy@gmail.com
>> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > > Subject: RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
>> > > Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 16:18:36 +0200
>> > >
>> > > Thanks Troy,
>> > >
>> > > It is very good.
>> > >
>> > > DIGY
>> > >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
>> > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 7:47 PM
>> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> > > Subject: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
>> > >
>> > > All,
>> > >
>> > > Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
>> > > eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
>> > > now are exactly what we need to do that.
>> > >
>> > > Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
>> > > needs for completing that proposal are:
>> > > - Build Initial Committers list
>> > > - Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
>> > > - Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
>> > >
>> > > The current draft of the proposal is located at:
>> > >
>> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > For each of those goals:
>> > >
>> > > Build Initial Committers List
>> > > -------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
>> > > Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
>> > >
>> > > - Chris Currens
>> > > - DIGY
>> > > - Michael Herndon
>> > > - Prescott Nasser
>> > > - Scott Lombard
>> > > - Sergey Mirvoda
>> > > - Troy Howard
>> > >
>> > > The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
>> > > hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
>> > > Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
>> > > you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
>> > > message indicating your interest.
>> > >
>> > > Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
>> > > Contributors (alphabetical):
>> > >
>> > > - Alex Thompson
>> > > - Ben Martz
>> > > - Frank Yu
>> > > - Glyn Darkin
>> > > - Peter Mateja
>> > > - Shashi Kant
>> > > - Simone Chiaretta
>> > > - Wyatt Barnett
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
>> > >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >
>> > > For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
>> > > submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
>> > > Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
>> > > DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
>> > > to do so by the end of the week.
>> > >
>> > > Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
>> > >
>> > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
>> > >
>> >
>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > ----------
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
>> > > text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
>> > > if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
>> > > anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
>> > > list expressing your concerns or ideas.
>> > >
>> > > I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
>> > > review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
>> > > who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
>> > > and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
>> > > the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
>> > >
>> > > Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
>> > >
>> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
>> > > second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
>> > > around this project and the effort and investments that have been
>> > > given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
>> > > The project could not survive without it.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Troy
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Michael Herndon
>> Senior Developer (mherndon@o19s.com)
>> 804.767.0083
>>
>> [connect online]
>> http://www.opensourceconnections.com
>> http://www.amptools.net
>> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-herndon/4/893/23
>> http://www.facebook.com/amptools.net
>> http://www.twitter.com/amptools-net
>
RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
Sergey also needs to submit his, and I'm guessing that Troy & Mike need to get a corporate CLA submitted as well (not sure if maybe this has been done)
The other thing is Digy and Sergey needs to update the Core Developer section with their information. I think if you don't want to explain much about yourself a generic sentence is alright - that's more or less what I put.
Other than that looks good to me at this point
~Prescott
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 12:58:30 -0500
> Subject: Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
> From: mherndon@o19s.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> I'll be faxing my cla off probably by tomorrow night.
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think there are some misunderstandings about how to contribute to
> > Lucene.Net.
> > Everyone is free to grab to source code, work on it and post the
> > bugs/improvements/new features. They are always welcomed.
> >
> > DIGY
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: srikalyan swayampakula [mailto:srikalyansswayam@hotmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 11:13 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
> >
> >
> > Hi Everyone,
> > I would like to be a contributor for this project. Is
> > there any chance to be one as I believe you have already decided on the
> > list
> > of people.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ~Sri.
> >
> >
> >
> > > From: digydigy@gmail.com
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
> > > Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 16:18:36 +0200
> > >
> > > Thanks Troy,
> > >
> > > It is very good.
> > >
> > > DIGY
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 7:47 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > > Subject: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
> > >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
> > > eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
> > > now are exactly what we need to do that.
> > >
> > > Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
> > > needs for completing that proposal are:
> > > - Build Initial Committers list
> > > - Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
> > > - Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
> > >
> > > The current draft of the proposal is located at:
> > >
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
> > >
> > >
> > > For each of those goals:
> > >
> > > Build Initial Committers List
> > > -------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
> > > Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
> > >
> > > - Chris Currens
> > > - DIGY
> > > - Michael Herndon
> > > - Prescott Nasser
> > > - Scott Lombard
> > > - Sergey Mirvoda
> > > - Troy Howard
> > >
> > > The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
> > > hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
> > > Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
> > > you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
> > > message indicating your interest.
> > >
> > > Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
> > > Contributors (alphabetical):
> > >
> > > - Alex Thompson
> > > - Ben Martz
> > > - Frank Yu
> > > - Glyn Darkin
> > > - Peter Mateja
> > > - Shashi Kant
> > > - Simone Chiaretta
> > > - Wyatt Barnett
> > >
> > >
> > > Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
> > > submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
> > > Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
> > > DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
> > > to do so by the end of the week.
> > >
> > > Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
> > >
> > > http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
> > >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > >
> > >
> > > So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
> > > text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
> > > if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
> > > anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
> > > list expressing your concerns or ideas.
> > >
> > > I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
> > > review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
> > > who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
> > > and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
> > > the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
> > >
> > > Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
> > >
> > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
> > >
> > >
> > > And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
> > > second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
> > > around this project and the effort and investments that have been
> > > given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
> > > The project could not survive without it.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Troy
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Michael Herndon
> Senior Developer (mherndon@o19s.com)
> 804.767.0083
>
> [connect online]
> http://www.opensourceconnections.com
> http://www.amptools.net
> http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-herndon/4/893/23
> http://www.facebook.com/amptools.net
> http://www.twitter.com/amptools-net
Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by Michael Herndon <mh...@o19s.com>.
I'll be faxing my cla off probably by tomorrow night.
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Digy <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think there are some misunderstandings about how to contribute to
> Lucene.Net.
> Everyone is free to grab to source code, work on it and post the
> bugs/improvements/new features. They are always welcomed.
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: srikalyan swayampakula [mailto:srikalyansswayam@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 11:13 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
>
>
> Hi Everyone,
> I would like to be a contributor for this project. Is
> there any chance to be one as I believe you have already decided on the
> list
> of people.
>
> Thanks,
> ~Sri.
>
>
>
> > From: digydigy@gmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
> > Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 16:18:36 +0200
> >
> > Thanks Troy,
> >
> > It is very good.
> >
> > DIGY
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 7:47 PM
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
> > eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
> > now are exactly what we need to do that.
> >
> > Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
> > needs for completing that proposal are:
> > - Build Initial Committers list
> > - Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
> > - Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
> >
> > The current draft of the proposal is located at:
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
> >
> >
> > For each of those goals:
> >
> > Build Initial Committers List
> > -------------------------------------------
> >
> > I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
> > Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
> >
> > - Chris Currens
> > - DIGY
> > - Michael Herndon
> > - Prescott Nasser
> > - Scott Lombard
> > - Sergey Mirvoda
> > - Troy Howard
> >
> > The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
> > hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
> > Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
> > you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
> > message indicating your interest.
> >
> > Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
> > Contributors (alphabetical):
> >
> > - Alex Thompson
> > - Ben Martz
> > - Frank Yu
> > - Glyn Darkin
> > - Peter Mateja
> > - Shashi Kant
> > - Simone Chiaretta
> > - Wyatt Barnett
> >
> >
> > Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
> > submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
> > Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
> > DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
> > to do so by the end of the week.
> >
> > Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
> >
> > http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
> >
> >
> >
> > Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
> >
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> >
> >
> > So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
> > text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
> > if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
> > anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
> > list expressing your concerns or ideas.
> >
> > I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
> > review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
> > who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
> > and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
> > the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
> >
> > Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
> >
> > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
> >
> >
> > And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
> > second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
> > around this project and the effort and investments that have been
> > given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
> > The project could not survive without it.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Troy
> >
>
>
>
--
Michael Herndon
Senior Developer (mherndon@o19s.com)
804.767.0083
[connect online]
http://www.opensourceconnections.com
http://www.amptools.net
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/michael-herndon/4/893/23
http://www.facebook.com/amptools.net
http://www.twitter.com/amptools-net
RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
I think there are some misunderstandings about how to contribute to
Lucene.Net.
Everyone is free to grab to source code, work on it and post the
bugs/improvements/new features. They are always welcomed.
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: srikalyan swayampakula [mailto:srikalyansswayam@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 11:13 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Hi Everyone,
I would like to be a contributor for this project. Is
there any chance to be one as I believe you have already decided on the list
of people.
Thanks,
~Sri.
> From: digydigy@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 16:18:36 +0200
>
> Thanks Troy,
>
> It is very good.
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 7:47 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
>
> All,
>
> Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
> eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
> now are exactly what we need to do that.
>
> Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
> needs for completing that proposal are:
> - Build Initial Committers list
> - Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
> - Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
>
> The current draft of the proposal is located at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>
>
> For each of those goals:
>
> Build Initial Committers List
> -------------------------------------------
>
> I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
> Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
>
> - Chris Currens
> - DIGY
> - Michael Herndon
> - Prescott Nasser
> - Scott Lombard
> - Sergey Mirvoda
> - Troy Howard
>
> The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
> hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
> Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
> you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
> message indicating your interest.
>
> Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
> Contributors (alphabetical):
>
> - Alex Thompson
> - Ben Martz
> - Frank Yu
> - Glyn Darkin
> - Peter Mateja
> - Shashi Kant
> - Simone Chiaretta
> - Wyatt Barnett
>
>
> Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
> submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
> Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
> DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
> to do so by the end of the week.
>
> Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
>
>
>
> Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------
>
>
> So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
> text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
> if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
> anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
> list expressing your concerns or ideas.
>
> I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
> review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
> who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
> and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
> the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
>
> Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>
>
> And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
> second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
> around this project and the effort and investments that have been
> given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
> The project could not survive without it.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by srikalyan swayampakula <sr...@hotmail.com>.
Hi Everyone,
I would like to be a contributor for this project. Is there any chance to be one as I believe you have already decided on the list of people.
Thanks,
~Sri.
> From: digydigy@gmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
> Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 16:18:36 +0200
>
> Thanks Troy,
>
> It is very good.
>
> DIGY
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 7:47 PM
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
>
> All,
>
> Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
> eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
> now are exactly what we need to do that.
>
> Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
> needs for completing that proposal are:
> - Build Initial Committers list
> - Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
> - Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
>
> The current draft of the proposal is located at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>
>
> For each of those goals:
>
> Build Initial Committers List
> -------------------------------------------
>
> I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
> Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
>
> - Chris Currens
> - DIGY
> - Michael Herndon
> - Prescott Nasser
> - Scott Lombard
> - Sergey Mirvoda
> - Troy Howard
>
> The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
> hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
> Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
> you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
> message indicating your interest.
>
> Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
> Contributors (alphabetical):
>
> - Alex Thompson
> - Ben Martz
> - Frank Yu
> - Glyn Darkin
> - Peter Mateja
> - Shashi Kant
> - Simone Chiaretta
> - Wyatt Barnett
>
>
> Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
> submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
> Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
> DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
> to do so by the end of the week.
>
> Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
>
>
>
> Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
> text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
> if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
> anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
> list expressing your concerns or ideas.
>
> I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
> review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
> who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
> and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
> the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
>
> Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>
>
> And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
> second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
> around this project and the effort and investments that have been
> given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
> The project could not survive without it.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
RE: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by Digy <di...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Troy,
It is very good.
DIGY
-----Original Message-----
From: Troy Howard [mailto:thoward37@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 7:47 PM
To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
All,
Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
now are exactly what we need to do that.
Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
needs for completing that proposal are:
- Build Initial Committers list
- Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
- Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
The current draft of the proposal is located at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
For each of those goals:
Build Initial Committers List
-------------------------------------------
I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
- Chris Currens
- DIGY
- Michael Herndon
- Prescott Nasser
- Scott Lombard
- Sergey Mirvoda
- Troy Howard
The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
message indicating your interest.
Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
Contributors (alphabetical):
- Alex Thompson
- Ben Martz
- Frank Yu
- Glyn Darkin
- Peter Mateja
- Shashi Kant
- Simone Chiaretta
- Wyatt Barnett
Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
to do so by the end of the week.
Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
list expressing your concerns or ideas.
I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
around this project and the effort and investments that have been
given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
The project could not survive without it.
Thanks,
Troy
Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com>.
For a description of the Affliliations section from the Guide to
Proposal Creation, see:
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html#template-affiliations
Essentially, this covers any non-ASF affiliations which may impact
your work as a committer. For example, if you work for a company, who
is paying you specifically to work on Lucene.Net, that affiliation
should be detailed. The risk is that the company may have interests
which could run into conflict with ASF, or if they are providing paid
development they may choose to stop providing that, causing a
committer to no longer be active or interested.
Because these situations present significant risk, it's best to detail
them upfront. I filled out information for my company because Chris
and I will both work on Lucene.Net as part of our on-the-clock work. I
don't foresee this as being an issue, but none-the-less, it's
appropriate to be fully transparent about this affiliation.
Thanks,
Troy
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Michael Herndon <mh...@o19s.com> wrote:
> Its seems to cover a good deal of ground including out of scope interest in
> solr, tika, & etc, without being verbose or too legalistic. Points for that.
>
>
> What are the particulars that needs to be covered in affiliations if any by
> committers and contributors?
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Peter.
>>
>> I forgot to specifically mention... DIGY, Prescott, and Sergey, could
>> you please modify the proposal to include your personal information?
>>
>> The Mentor list is TBD by the Incubator post-proposal submission.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Troy
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Peter Mateja <pe...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Allowing for the remaining TODO and TBD items in the proposal (currently
>> a
>> > few commiter profiles and the project mentor), I think the draft looks
>> good.
>> > That is, I don't see any red flags and the tone is positive and
>> motivated.
>> > I'd have to do a closer read to catch any grammatical issues, but I'm
>> good
>> > with the content.
>> >
>> > Peter Mateja
>> > peter.mateja@gmail.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> All,
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
>> >> eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
>> >> now are exactly what we need to do that.
>> >>
>> >> Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
>> >> needs for completing that proposal are:
>> >> - Build Initial Committers list
>> >> - Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
>> >> - Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
>> >>
>> >> The current draft of the proposal is located at:
>> >>
>> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> For each of those goals:
>> >>
>> >> Build Initial Committers List
>> >> -------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
>> >> Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
>> >>
>> >> - Chris Currens
>> >> - DIGY
>> >> - Michael Herndon
>> >> - Prescott Nasser
>> >> - Scott Lombard
>> >> - Sergey Mirvoda
>> >> - Troy Howard
>> >>
>> >> The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
>> >> hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
>> >> Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
>> >> you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
>> >> message indicating your interest.
>> >>
>> >> Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
>> >> Contributors (alphabetical):
>> >>
>> >> - Alex Thompson
>> >> - Ben Martz
>> >> - Frank Yu
>> >> - Glyn Darkin
>> >> - Peter Mateja
>> >> - Shashi Kant
>> >> - Simone Chiaretta
>> >> - Wyatt Barnett
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
>> >>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
>> >> submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
>> >> Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
>> >> DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
>> >> to do so by the end of the week.
>> >>
>> >> Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
>> >>
>> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
>> >>
>> >>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
>> >> text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
>> >> if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
>> >> anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
>> >> list expressing your concerns or ideas.
>> >>
>> >> I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
>> >> review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
>> >> who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
>> >> and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
>> >> the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
>> >>
>> >> Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
>> >>
>> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
>> >> second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
>> >> around this project and the effort and investments that have been
>> >> given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
>> >> The project could not survive without it.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Troy
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by Michael Herndon <mh...@o19s.com>.
Its seems to cover a good deal of ground including out of scope interest in
solr, tika, & etc, without being verbose or too legalistic. Points for that.
What are the particulars that needs to be covered in affiliations if any by
committers and contributors?
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks, Peter.
>
> I forgot to specifically mention... DIGY, Prescott, and Sergey, could
> you please modify the proposal to include your personal information?
>
> The Mentor list is TBD by the Incubator post-proposal submission.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Peter Mateja <pe...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Allowing for the remaining TODO and TBD items in the proposal (currently
> a
> > few commiter profiles and the project mentor), I think the draft looks
> good.
> > That is, I don't see any red flags and the tone is positive and
> motivated.
> > I'd have to do a closer read to catch any grammatical issues, but I'm
> good
> > with the content.
> >
> > Peter Mateja
> > peter.mateja@gmail.com
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
> >> eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
> >> now are exactly what we need to do that.
> >>
> >> Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
> >> needs for completing that proposal are:
> >> - Build Initial Committers list
> >> - Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
> >> - Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
> >>
> >> The current draft of the proposal is located at:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
> >>
> >>
> >> For each of those goals:
> >>
> >> Build Initial Committers List
> >> -------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
> >> Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
> >>
> >> - Chris Currens
> >> - DIGY
> >> - Michael Herndon
> >> - Prescott Nasser
> >> - Scott Lombard
> >> - Sergey Mirvoda
> >> - Troy Howard
> >>
> >> The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
> >> hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
> >> Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
> >> you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
> >> message indicating your interest.
> >>
> >> Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
> >> Contributors (alphabetical):
> >>
> >> - Alex Thompson
> >> - Ben Martz
> >> - Frank Yu
> >> - Glyn Darkin
> >> - Peter Mateja
> >> - Shashi Kant
> >> - Simone Chiaretta
> >> - Wyatt Barnett
> >>
> >>
> >> Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
> >> submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
> >> Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
> >> DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
> >> to do so by the end of the week.
> >>
> >> Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
> >>
> >> http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
> >>
> >>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> >> So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
> >> text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
> >> if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
> >> anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
> >> list expressing your concerns or ideas.
> >>
> >> I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
> >> review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
> >> who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
> >> and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
> >> the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
> >>
> >> Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
> >>
> >>
> >> And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
> >> second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
> >> around this project and the effort and investments that have been
> >> given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
> >> The project could not survive without it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Troy
> >>
> >
>
Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Peter.
I forgot to specifically mention... DIGY, Prescott, and Sergey, could
you please modify the proposal to include your personal information?
The Mentor list is TBD by the Incubator post-proposal submission.
Thanks,
Troy
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Peter Mateja <pe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Allowing for the remaining TODO and TBD items in the proposal (currently a
> few commiter profiles and the project mentor), I think the draft looks good.
> That is, I don't see any red flags and the tone is positive and motivated.
> I'd have to do a closer read to catch any grammatical issues, but I'm good
> with the content.
>
> Peter Mateja
> peter.mateja@gmail.com
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
>> eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
>> now are exactly what we need to do that.
>>
>> Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
>> needs for completing that proposal are:
>> - Build Initial Committers list
>> - Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
>> - Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
>>
>> The current draft of the proposal is located at:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>>
>>
>> For each of those goals:
>>
>> Build Initial Committers List
>> -------------------------------------------
>>
>> I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
>> Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
>>
>> - Chris Currens
>> - DIGY
>> - Michael Herndon
>> - Prescott Nasser
>> - Scott Lombard
>> - Sergey Mirvoda
>> - Troy Howard
>>
>> The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
>> hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
>> Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
>> you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
>> message indicating your interest.
>>
>> Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
>> Contributors (alphabetical):
>>
>> - Alex Thompson
>> - Ben Martz
>> - Frank Yu
>> - Glyn Darkin
>> - Peter Mateja
>> - Shashi Kant
>> - Simone Chiaretta
>> - Wyatt Barnett
>>
>>
>> Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
>> submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
>> Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
>> DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
>> to do so by the end of the week.
>>
>> Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
>>
>>
>>
>> Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
>> text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
>> if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
>> anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
>> list expressing your concerns or ideas.
>>
>> I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
>> review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
>> who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
>> and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
>> the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
>>
>> Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>>
>>
>> And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
>> second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
>> around this project and the effort and investments that have been
>> given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
>> The project could not survive without it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Troy
>>
>
Re: Proposal Status, Initial Committors List, Contributors List
Posted by Peter Mateja <pe...@gmail.com>.
Allowing for the remaining TODO and TBD items in the proposal (currently a
few commiter profiles and the project mentor), I think the draft looks good.
That is, I don't see any red flags and the tone is positive and motivated.
I'd have to do a closer read to catch any grammatical issues, but I'm good
with the content.
Peter Mateja
peter.mateja@gmail.com
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Troy Howard <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> Thanks for all the recent activity in the mailing lists. I'm really
> eager to get this project moving forward and the discussions going on
> now are exactly what we need to do that.
>
> Calling attention back to the Incubator proposal, the outstanding
> needs for completing that proposal are:
> - Build Initial Committers list
> - Ensure that Committers have all submitted a CLA
> - Ensure that the proposal is inline with community interest
>
> The current draft of the proposal is located at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>
>
> For each of those goals:
>
> Build Initial Committers List
> -------------------------------------------
>
> I have updated the proposal to reflect the current state of the
> Initial Committers list. The list, at present is (alphabetical):
>
> - Chris Currens
> - DIGY
> - Michael Herndon
> - Prescott Nasser
> - Scott Lombard
> - Sergey Mirvoda
> - Troy Howard
>
> The only other person who has been discussed as a Committer, but
> hasn't stated formally that they are interested in that role is Heath
> Aldrich (there was some discussion, but no resolution). So, Heath, if
> you'd like to be on the Initial Committers list, please send a quick
> message indicating your interest.
>
> Additionally, the following people have come forward as willing
> Contributors (alphabetical):
>
> - Alex Thompson
> - Ben Martz
> - Frank Yu
> - Glyn Darkin
> - Peter Mateja
> - Shashi Kant
> - Simone Chiaretta
> - Wyatt Barnett
>
>
> Ensure that Committers Have All Submitted a CLA
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> For those of you on the Initial Committers list, we will need to
> submit CLAs for each developer before being granted commit access.
> Currently the only person on that list who has submitted a CLA is
> DIGY. I'll be sending mine in today, and I encourage the rest of you
> to do so by the end of the week.
>
> Information about the CLA, and how to submit is located here:
>
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/#clas
>
>
>
> Ensure That the Proposal Is Inline With Community Interest
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> So far, I have not heard any feedback from the community about the
> text of the Incubator Proposal. Please review the current draft, and
> if you have any reservations about the contents or language, feel that
> anything is missing or should be omitted, please post to the mailing
> list expressing your concerns or ideas.
>
> I will be submitting the proposal on Tuesday, January 11th, so please
> review it and discuss prior to that. I want to make sure that everyone
> who is effected by our proposal has had the opportunity to review it,
> and either determine that they completely agree with it or give them
> the opportunity to discuss their opinions openly prior to submission.
>
> Again, the current draft of the proposal is located at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/Lucene.Net%20Proposal
>
>
> And, even though I sign most of my emails 'Thanks', I'd like to take a
> second and express my sincere appreciation for the community we have
> around this project and the effort and investments that have been
> given and will continue to be given in the future by our contributors.
> The project could not survive without it.
>
> Thanks,
> Troy
>