Jetty plugin can be used to run the myfaces examples

[Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>]

Hi there,

I have just modified the examples base pom so now it is possible to
run the examples directly using the maven jetty plugin.
It is possible now too to choose whether to use myfaces or the ri for
the war file generated. If no profile is used, the examples will
include myfaces (the default behaviour). To build the examples with
the RI, use:

mvn -P jsfri install

When using jetty, we have to also put the other profile used
(myfaces/jsfri). So, to run jetty directly with maven we could do
something like this:

mvn -P jettyConfig,myfaces jetty6:run

Hope you like that!

Bruno

Re: Jetty plugin can be used to run the myfaces examples

[Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>]

And better if you always include the "clean" goal!

mvn -P jettyConfig,myfaces clean jetty6:run

Bruno

On 6/10/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have just modified the examples base pom so now it is possible to
> run the examples directly using the maven jetty plugin.
> It is possible now too to choose whether to use myfaces or the ri for
> the war file generated. If no profile is used, the examples will
> include myfaces (the default behaviour). To build the examples with
> the RI, use:
>
> mvn -P jsfri install
>
> When using jetty, we have to also put the other profile used
> (myfaces/jsfri). So, to run jetty directly with maven we could do
> something like this:
>
> mvn -P jettyConfig,myfaces jetty6:run
>
> Hope you like that!
>
> Bruno
>

Re: Jetty plugin can be used to run the myfaces examples

[Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>]

MYFACES-1330

On 6/12/06, Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/10/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I'm running into MNG-2136 where the activation of another profile by
> > > the presence of JDK 1.5 suppresses the activeByDefault profile.
> > >
> >
> > Mmh, hope it gets fixed soon! We are not using the jdk5 check now, but
> > it is useful indeed (when it works).
>
> The issue is resolved-- it's working the way the Maven devs want it to.
>
> Someone on users@maven suggested a better way to do it, activating the
> myfaces profile on the *absence* of a system property:
>
>    <name>!jsf</name>
>
> MYFACES-1130 is open with patches for the archteypes.
>
> --
> Wendy
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: Jetty plugin can be used to run the myfaces examples

[Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>]

On 6/10/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm running into MNG-2136 where the activation of another profile by
> > the presence of JDK 1.5 suppresses the activeByDefault profile.
> >
>
> Mmh, hope it gets fixed soon! We are not using the jdk5 check now, but
> it is useful indeed (when it works).

The issue is resolved-- it's working the way the Maven devs want it to.

Someone on users@maven suggested a better way to do it, activating the
myfaces profile on the *absence* of a system property:

   <name>!jsf</name>

MYFACES-1130 is open with patches for the archteypes.

-- 
Wendy

Re: Jetty plugin can be used to run the myfaces examples

[Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>]

the listner is describe (by both RI and MyFaces)
in the core tag tld file.

Jetty had a problem with that. You needed to use the web.xml (for both again).
Jetty6-snapshot fixed it (as you see in the notes, posted by bruno)

-Matthias

On 6/10/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I'm running into MNG-2136 where the activation of another profile by
> > the presence of JDK 1.5 suppresses the activeByDefault profile.
> >
>
> Mmh, hope it gets fixed soon! We are not using the jdk5 check now, but
> it is useful indeed (when it works).
>
> > Another question -- I remember seeing a comment in one of the web.xml
> > files that a Filter or a Listener had to be configured so the app
> > would run under Jetty.  Is there any MyFaces-specific configuration
> > that won't work if you just drop the RI jars into the examples?
> >
> > I'm pretty sure the Shale examples all work with either MyFaces or the
> > RI under Tomcat, but when I tried Jetty they wouldn't start,
> > complaining about something missing from web.xml.
> >
> > (If this makes no sense, I'm probably not remembering it correctly.)
>
> Yes, you remember correctly! Now that you say it, I remember that too.
> I have read the jetty 6 version notes [1] and I see that the listener
> thing was fixed in the version jetty-6.0.0beta9. So now we can deploy
> using jetty without any hazzle (at least with the current version and
> in my computer... you never know ;) ). So I guess you can use it again
> in shale now...
>
> Cheers!
>
> Bruno
>
> [1] http://jetty.mortbay.org/jetty6/VERSION.txt
> >
> > --
> > Wendy
> >
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
Aechterhoek 18
48282 Emsdetten
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: Jetty plugin can be used to run the myfaces examples

[Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>]

> I'm running into MNG-2136 where the activation of another profile by
> the presence of JDK 1.5 suppresses the activeByDefault profile.
>

Mmh, hope it gets fixed soon! We are not using the jdk5 check now, but
it is useful indeed (when it works).

> Another question -- I remember seeing a comment in one of the web.xml
> files that a Filter or a Listener had to be configured so the app
> would run under Jetty.  Is there any MyFaces-specific configuration
> that won't work if you just drop the RI jars into the examples?
>
> I'm pretty sure the Shale examples all work with either MyFaces or the
> RI under Tomcat, but when I tried Jetty they wouldn't start,
> complaining about something missing from web.xml.
>
> (If this makes no sense, I'm probably not remembering it correctly.)

Yes, you remember correctly! Now that you say it, I remember that too.
I have read the jetty 6 version notes [1] and I see that the listener
thing was fixed in the version jetty-6.0.0beta9. So now we can deploy
using jetty without any hazzle (at least with the current version and
in my computer... you never know ;) ). So I guess you can use it again
in shale now...

Cheers!

Bruno

[1] http://jetty.mortbay.org/jetty6/VERSION.txt
>
> --
> Wendy
>

Re: Jetty plugin can be used to run the myfaces examples

[Wendy Smoak <ws...@gmail.com>]

On 6/10/06, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have just modified the examples base pom so now it is possible to
> run the examples directly using the maven jetty plugin.
> It is possible now too to choose whether to use myfaces or the ri for
> the war file generated. If no profile is used, the examples will
> include myfaces (the default behaviour). To build the examples with
> the RI, use:
>
> mvn -P jsfri install

Very nice, though I'm jealous that your 'activeByDefault' profile
actually works.

I'm running into MNG-2136 where the activation of another profile by
the presence of JDK 1.5 suppresses the activeByDefault profile.

Another question -- I remember seeing a comment in one of the web.xml
files that a Filter or a Listener had to be configured so the app
would run under Jetty.  Is there any MyFaces-specific configuration
that won't work if you just drop the RI jars into the examples?

I'm pretty sure the Shale examples all work with either MyFaces or the
RI under Tomcat, but when I tried Jetty they wouldn't start,
complaining about something missing from web.xml.

(If this makes no sense, I'm probably not remembering it correctly.)

-- 
Wendy