You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@continuum.apache.org by ol...@apache.org on 2008/06/12 23:30:43 UTC
svn commit: r667235 - /continuum/trunk/pom.xml
Author: olamy
Date: Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
New Revision: 667235
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667235&view=rev
Log:
upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in svn args)
Modified:
continuum/trunk/pom.xml
Modified: continuum/trunk/pom.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/pom.xml?rev=667235&r1=667234&r2=667235&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original)
+++ continuum/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
@@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
<dependency>
<groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
<artifactId>plexus-utils</artifactId>
- <version>1.5.1</version>
+ <version>1.5.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
Re: svn commit: r667235 - /continuum/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
and maven*, maven-scm, plexus-* too :)
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:
> The current continuum active committers : yes :-)
>
> 2008/6/13 Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>:
> > I know :) Do all continuum committers have the ability to commit to
> plexus-utils ?
> >
> > Mvgr,
> > Martin
> >
> > Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> >> We maintain plexus-utils too and it's generally Olivier that do
> plexus-utils
> >> releases ;)
> >>
> >> Emmanuel
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This is a mail coming a bit out of the blue probably, since I haven't
> been
> >>> really publicly active
> >>> yet on continuum.
> >>>
> >>> Can we please not depend on SNAPSHOT's anymore that are outside of the
> >>> continuum project ? This
> >>> makes continuum highly unstable and makes maintenance way too hard if
> you
> >>> also have to start
> >>> monitoring the external snapshots. Continuum is not the place to test a
> bug
> >>> fix in plexus-utils I
> >>> think (if that is what happened, didn't check the plexus-utils
> changes).
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Mvgr,
> >>> Martin
> >>>
> >>> olamy@apache.org wrote:
> >>>> Author: olamy
> >>>> Date: Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
> >>>> New Revision: 667235
> >>>>
> >>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667235&view=rev
> >>>> Log:
> >>>> upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon
> in
> >>> svn args)
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Modified:
> >>>> continuum/trunk/pom.xml
> >>>>
> >>>> Modified: continuum/trunk/pom.xml
> >>>> URL:
> >>>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/pom.xml?rev=667235&r1=667234&r2=667235&view=diff
> >>>
> ==============================================================================
> >>>> --- continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> >>>> +++ continuum/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
> >>>> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
> >>>> <dependency>
> >>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
> >>>> <artifactId>plexus-utils</artifactId>
> >>>> - <version>1.5.1</version>
> >>>> + <version>1.5.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
> >>>> </dependency>
> >>>> <dependency>
> >>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: svn commit: r667235 - /continuum/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
The current continuum active committers : yes :-)
2008/6/13 Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>:
> I know :) Do all continuum committers have the ability to commit to plexus-utils ?
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>> We maintain plexus-utils too and it's generally Olivier that do plexus-utils
>> releases ;)
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This is a mail coming a bit out of the blue probably, since I haven't been
>>> really publicly active
>>> yet on continuum.
>>>
>>> Can we please not depend on SNAPSHOT's anymore that are outside of the
>>> continuum project ? This
>>> makes continuum highly unstable and makes maintenance way too hard if you
>>> also have to start
>>> monitoring the external snapshots. Continuum is not the place to test a bug
>>> fix in plexus-utils I
>>> think (if that is what happened, didn't check the plexus-utils changes).
>>>
>>>
>>> Mvgr,
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> olamy@apache.org wrote:
>>>> Author: olamy
>>>> Date: Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
>>>> New Revision: 667235
>>>>
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667235&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in
>>> svn args)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Modified:
>>>> continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>>>>
>>>> Modified: continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>>>> URL:
>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/pom.xml?rev=667235&r1=667234&r2=667235&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>>> +++ continuum/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
>>>> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
>>>> <dependency>
>>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>>>> <artifactId>plexus-utils</artifactId>
>>>> - <version>1.5.1</version>
>>>> + <version>1.5.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>>> </dependency>
>>>> <dependency>
>>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: svn commit: r667235 - /continuum/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
I know :) Do all continuum committers have the ability to commit to plexus-utils ?
Mvgr,
Martin
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> We maintain plexus-utils too and it's generally Olivier that do plexus-utils
> releases ;)
>
> Emmanuel
>
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>
> wrote:
>
>> This is a mail coming a bit out of the blue probably, since I haven't been
>> really publicly active
>> yet on continuum.
>>
>> Can we please not depend on SNAPSHOT's anymore that are outside of the
>> continuum project ? This
>> makes continuum highly unstable and makes maintenance way too hard if you
>> also have to start
>> monitoring the external snapshots. Continuum is not the place to test a bug
>> fix in plexus-utils I
>> think (if that is what happened, didn't check the plexus-utils changes).
>>
>>
>> Mvgr,
>> Martin
>>
>> olamy@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: olamy
>>> Date: Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
>>> New Revision: 667235
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667235&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in
>> svn args)
>>>
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/pom.xml?rev=667235&r1=667234&r2=667235&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>> +++ continuum/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
>>> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>plexus-utils</artifactId>
>>> - <version>1.5.1</version>
>>> + <version>1.5.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Re: svn commit: r667235 - /continuum/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>.
We maintain plexus-utils too and it's generally Olivier that do plexus-utils
releases ;)
Emmanuel
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>
wrote:
> This is a mail coming a bit out of the blue probably, since I haven't been
> really publicly active
> yet on continuum.
>
> Can we please not depend on SNAPSHOT's anymore that are outside of the
> continuum project ? This
> makes continuum highly unstable and makes maintenance way too hard if you
> also have to start
> monitoring the external snapshots. Continuum is not the place to test a bug
> fix in plexus-utils I
> think (if that is what happened, didn't check the plexus-utils changes).
>
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> olamy@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: olamy
> > Date: Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
> > New Revision: 667235
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667235&view=rev
> > Log:
> > upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in
> svn args)
> >
> >
> >
> > Modified:
> > continuum/trunk/pom.xml
> >
> > Modified: continuum/trunk/pom.xml
> > URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/pom.xml?rev=667235&r1=667234&r2=667235&view=diff
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > --- continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> > +++ continuum/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
> > @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
> > <artifactId>plexus-utils</artifactId>
> > - <version>1.5.1</version>
> > + <version>1.5.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
> > </dependency>
> > <dependency>
> > <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: svn commit: r667235 - /continuum/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
That said, commons-exec is asking to exit the commons-sandbox. Might
be time to look at migrating - it's all derived from the same code :)
- Brett
On 13/06/2008, at 11:56 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> The comment says "upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for
> CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in svn args)".
> There is an issue CONTINUUM-1360 which depends on a fix in p-u [1]
> which has been fixed in the p-u trunk [2] (note the commiter name ;-)
> ).
> And I can't see any build issue because the codehaus snapshots repo is
> declared in the pom due to the snapshot dependency.
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXUTILS-78
> [2] http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/plexus/?cs=7367
>
> 2008/6/13 Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>:
>> This is a mail coming a bit out of the blue probably, since I
>> haven't been really publicly active
>> yet on continuum.
>>
>> Can we please not depend on SNAPSHOT's anymore that are outside of
>> the continuum project ? This
>> makes continuum highly unstable and makes maintenance way too hard
>> if you also have to start
>> monitoring the external snapshots. Continuum is not the place to
>> test a bug fix in plexus-utils I
>> think (if that is what happened, didn't check the plexus-utils
>> changes).
>>
>>
>> Mvgr,
>> Martin
>>
>> olamy@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: olamy
>>> Date: Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
>>> New Revision: 667235
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667235&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for CONTINUUM-1360
>>> (semicolon in svn args)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/pom.xml?rev=667235&r1=667234&r2=667235&view=diff
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> ====================================================================
>>> --- continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>> +++ continuum/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
>>> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>plexus-utils</artifactId>
>>> - <version>1.5.1</version>
>>> + <version>1.5.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: svn commit: r667235 - /continuum/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
Sorry that I just picked an example that is reasonably managed by people (in this case you
specifically) on the project. In this case it was pretty hard to solve it another way (the static
final doesn't really help) anyhow..
The fix will only work if you public http access, since most companies that setup a maven proxy
probably don't sync with the snapshot repo of codehaus (not a problem for me in this case though,
but at a couple of customers I don't have that luxury).
(this is not the first time that SNAPSHOT's are used, it's just that I noticed now one being added,
that I thought it was a good time to bring the subject up).
Can you agree on the general sentiment even though the example taken was a bad one ?
(I had several problems in the past because of changing SNAPSHOT in continuum, hence the mails..)
Mvgr,
Martin
Olivier Lamy wrote:
> Hi,
> The comment says "upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for
> CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in svn args)".
> There is an issue CONTINUUM-1360 which depends on a fix in p-u [1]
> which has been fixed in the p-u trunk [2] (note the commiter name ;-)
> ).
> And I can't see any build issue because the codehaus snapshots repo is
> declared in the pom due to the snapshot dependency.
>
> --
> Olivier
>
> [1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXUTILS-78
> [2] http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/plexus/?cs=7367
>
> 2008/6/13 Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>:
>> This is a mail coming a bit out of the blue probably, since I haven't been really publicly active
>> yet on continuum.
>>
>> Can we please not depend on SNAPSHOT's anymore that are outside of the continuum project ? This
>> makes continuum highly unstable and makes maintenance way too hard if you also have to start
>> monitoring the external snapshots. Continuum is not the place to test a bug fix in plexus-utils I
>> think (if that is what happened, didn't check the plexus-utils changes).
>>
>>
>> Mvgr,
>> Martin
>>
>> olamy@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: olamy
>>> Date: Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
>>> New Revision: 667235
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667235&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in svn args)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>> continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>>>
>>> Modified: continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/pom.xml?rev=667235&r1=667234&r2=667235&view=diff
>>> ==============================================================================
>>> --- continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>>> +++ continuum/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
>>> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>>> <artifactId>plexus-utils</artifactId>
>>> - <version>1.5.1</version>
>>> + <version>1.5.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
>>> </dependency>
>>> <dependency>
>>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
Re: svn commit: r667235 - /continuum/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
Hi,
The comment says "upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for
CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in svn args)".
There is an issue CONTINUUM-1360 which depends on a fix in p-u [1]
which has been fixed in the p-u trunk [2] (note the commiter name ;-)
).
And I can't see any build issue because the codehaus snapshots repo is
declared in the pom due to the snapshot dependency.
--
Olivier
[1] http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLXUTILS-78
[2] http://fisheye.codehaus.org/changelog/plexus/?cs=7367
2008/6/13 Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>:
> This is a mail coming a bit out of the blue probably, since I haven't been really publicly active
> yet on continuum.
>
> Can we please not depend on SNAPSHOT's anymore that are outside of the continuum project ? This
> makes continuum highly unstable and makes maintenance way too hard if you also have to start
> monitoring the external snapshots. Continuum is not the place to test a bug fix in plexus-utils I
> think (if that is what happened, didn't check the plexus-utils changes).
>
>
> Mvgr,
> Martin
>
> olamy@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: olamy
>> Date: Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
>> New Revision: 667235
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667235&view=rev
>> Log:
>> upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in svn args)
>>
>>
>>
>> Modified:
>> continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>>
>> Modified: continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/pom.xml?rev=667235&r1=667234&r2=667235&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original)
>> +++ continuum/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
>> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>> <artifactId>plexus-utils</artifactId>
>> - <version>1.5.1</version>
>> + <version>1.5.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
>> </dependency>
>> <dependency>
>> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: svn commit: r667235 - /continuum/trunk/pom.xml
Posted by Martin van den Bemt <ml...@mvdb.net>.
This is a mail coming a bit out of the blue probably, since I haven't been really publicly active
yet on continuum.
Can we please not depend on SNAPSHOT's anymore that are outside of the continuum project ? This
makes continuum highly unstable and makes maintenance way too hard if you also have to start
monitoring the external snapshots. Continuum is not the place to test a bug fix in plexus-utils I
think (if that is what happened, didn't check the plexus-utils changes).
Mvgr,
Martin
olamy@apache.org wrote:
> Author: olamy
> Date: Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
> New Revision: 667235
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=667235&view=rev
> Log:
> upgrade to last p-u SNAPSHOT to test fix for CONTINUUM-1360 (semicolon in svn args)
>
>
>
> Modified:
> continuum/trunk/pom.xml
>
> Modified: continuum/trunk/pom.xml
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/continuum/trunk/pom.xml?rev=667235&r1=667234&r2=667235&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- continuum/trunk/pom.xml (original)
> +++ continuum/trunk/pom.xml Thu Jun 12 14:30:43 2008
> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
> <artifactId>plexus-utils</artifactId>
> - <version>1.5.1</version>
> + <version>1.5.2-SNAPSHOT</version>
> </dependency>
> <dependency>
> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId>
>
>
>
>