You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm> on 2010/03/01 21:14:29 UTC
Re: svn commit: r917675 - in /apr/apr/trunk/file_io: netware/ os2/ unix/ win32/
On 01 Mar 2010, at 9:45 PM, minfrin@apache.org wrote:
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917675&view=rev
> Log:
> Use the APR_FOPEN_* constants instead of the deprecated APR_*
> constants
> within the file_io code.
Question: do we remove APR_READ and friends from includes/
apr_file_io.h in apr v2.x, or do we wait for v3.x?
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: svn commit: r917675 - in /apr/apr/trunk/file_io: netware/ os2/ unix/ win32/
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
On 01 Mar 2010, at 10:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> Question: do we remove APR_READ and friends from includes/
>> apr_file_io.h
>> in apr v2.x, or do we wait for v3.x?
>
> +1 for 2.0
>
> Because these are namespace protected, it's really a matter of
> preference.
+1.
Regards,
Graham
--
Re: svn commit: r917675 - in /apr/apr/trunk/file_io: netware/ os2/
unix/ win32/
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 3/1/2010 2:14 PM, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On 01 Mar 2010, at 9:45 PM, minfrin@apache.org wrote:
>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=917675&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Use the APR_FOPEN_* constants instead of the deprecated APR_* constants
>> within the file_io code.
>
> Question: do we remove APR_READ and friends from includes/apr_file_io.h
> in apr v2.x, or do we wait for v3.x?
+1 for 2.0
Because these are namespace protected, it's really a matter of preference.