Re: Anyone else seeing this

[Matt Kettler <mk...@verizon.net>]

Yes. It's annoying as crap because it ignores the Return-Path and
contacts the From:.

What's even worse is one of their rules triggered on the error message
so when I forwarded it, as requested, it got kicked back..


Chris wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing the below when sending a message to the list?
>
>
> Potential Porn email moved to Porn Folder
>  Date: Tue Nov 28 21:23:17 2006
>  From: postmaster@csg.com.au
>  To: Mick.Delaney@csg.com.au
>  CC: cpollock@earthlink.net
>  
> Potential Pornographic junk mail detected.  
>
> If you believe this email is legitimate please _forward_ this message 
> to postmaster@csg.com.au, requesting that it be released.
>
> The sender of this message has _not_ been notified.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> MailMarshal (an automated content monitoring gateway) has not 
> delivered the following message:
>
>    Message: B0003d9535.00000001.mml
>    From:    cpollock@earthlink.net
>    To:      Mick.Delaney@csg.com.au
>    Subject: Top spamming ASN's and CIDR's for 1-28 Nov 06
>
> This is due to automatic rules that have determined that the 
> message is probably Porn related junk email.  If you believe the message was 
> business related please contact postmaster@csg.com.au and request
> that the message be released.  If no contact is made within 4 
> days the message will automatically be deleted.
>
> MailMarshal Rule: CSG Bothways : Porn Specific
> Script Porn Specific Triggered in Body
> Expression: cum Triggered 1 times weighting 5
>
>
> For more information on email virus scanning, security and content 
> management, visit http://www.marshalsoftware.com
> 	
>   

Re: Anyone else seeing this

[Chris <cp...@earthlink.net>]

On Tuesday 28 November 2006 9:50 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Yes. It's annoying as crap because it ignores the Return-Path and
> contacts the From:.
>
> What's even worse is one of their rules triggered on the error message
> so when I forwarded it, as requested, it got kicked back..
>
> Chris wrote:
Yep, same here, three times. Maybe he needs to be removed from the list, or 
contacted somehow and since this is a type of C/R (in my opinion) it 
shouldn't be used on a mailing list.

-- 
Chris