You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com> on 2008/10/01 13:18:29 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0
I found one smallish issue: the contrib/CHANGES.txt still lists "Trunk
(not yet released)" at the top.
I'll fix it and create new artifacts, and update the ReleaseTodo.
Mike
Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> I've built the release artifacts, from revision 700430 on the 2.4
> branch. These are the changes:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4changes/Changes.html
>
> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as 2.4.0:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4
>
> We need at least 3 binding (PMC) votes.
>
> Mike
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
Phew :)
Mike
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>> Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>>
>>> AIUI, Apache only officially releases source code, so any binaries
>>> are
>>> artifacts or derivatives of a release, not really the release
>>> itself.
>>
>> Unless those artifacts include the source code. It's best to vote
>> on a
>> signed tgz file than a subversion tag, since the latter can change.
>
> True enough. After some more reading, it appears that voting on the
> final signed build that includes source is the current best practice.
> You did it perfectly Mike, thanks!
>
> -Yonik
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0
Posted by Yonik Seeley <yo...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Yonik Seeley wrote:
>>
>> AIUI, Apache only officially releases source code, so any binaries are
>> artifacts or derivatives of a release, not really the release itself.
>
> Unless those artifacts include the source code. It's best to vote on a
> signed tgz file than a subversion tag, since the latter can change.
True enough. After some more reading, it appears that voting on the
final signed build that includes source is the current best practice.
You did it perfectly Mike, thanks!
-Yonik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0
Posted by Doug Cutting <cu...@apache.org>.
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> AIUI, Apache only officially releases source code, so any binaries are
> artifacts or derivatives of a release, not really the release itself.
Unless those artifacts include the source code. It's best to vote on a
signed tgz file than a subversion tag, since the latter can change.
Doug
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0
Posted by Yonik Seeley <yo...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Michael McCandless
<lu...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
> OK new artifacts area here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4take2
>
> Please VOTE to release those as 2.4.0.
+1
AIUI, Apache only officially releases source code, so any binaries are
artifacts or derivatives of a release, not really the release itself.
Of course, that doesn't mean we can't vote to ensure the integrity of
any artifacts or downloads... it's really just a slight change in
communication - perhaps something like "please vote to release 2.4.0,
downloads (or release artifacts) are here:"
-Yonik
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
OK new artifacts area here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4take2
Please VOTE to release those as 2.4.0.
Mike
Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> I found one smallish issue: the contrib/CHANGES.txt still lists
> "Trunk (not yet released)" at the top.
>
> I'll fix it and create new artifacts, and update the ReleaseTodo.
>
> Mike
>
> Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>>
>> I've built the release artifacts, from revision 700430 on the 2.4
>> branch. These are the changes:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4changes/Changes.html
>>
>> Please vote to officially release these artifacts as 2.4.0:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4
>>
>> We need at least 3 binding (PMC) votes.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org