You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com> on 2005/03/22 11:26:02 UTC
Webapps src moved?!
Hi all,
What was the reason to move the src dirs of the web applications into
one webapps/src dir?!
This breaks structure and is very confusing, IMHO. Each webapp should
have it's own sources, that should be clearly separated. If - for
non-redundancy reason - we need classes in two or more webapps we
should make a webapps common src dir.
Proposal:
- Leave webapp sources at /webapps/src but in different sub folders:
/webapps/src/examples
/webapps/src/tiles
/webapps/src/wap
and so on
- Package structure should stay the same:
/webapps/src/examples/org/apache/myfaces/examples
/webapps/src/tiles/org/apache/myfaces/tiles
/webapps/src/wap/org/apache/myfaces/wap
and so on
- One common webapp sources dir
/webapps/src/common/org/apache/myfaces/common
-MG
Re: Webapps src moved?!
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
That's ok. Just be sure to change the build.xml. There is an argument
for where the web source is (if you look at the tiles one you will see
what I mean.)
sean
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:55:25 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf
<ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de> wrote:
> Ok,
>
> I did that stuff.
>
> So please check the new CVS stuff.
>
> BTW. now WAP-Example is only included
> in myfacs-app TGZ
>
> -Matthias
>
> Manfred Geiler wrote:
> > +1
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:13:32 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf
> > <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de> wrote:
> >
> >>Sean,
> >>
> >>I am fine with
> >>
> >>/webapps/src/examples
> >>/webapps/src/tiles
> >>/webapps/src/wap
> >>
> >>where /webapps/src/examples
> >>is also base for "simpelWebApp"
> >>
> >>Ok?
> >>
> >>-Matthias
> >>
> >>Sean Schofield wrote:
> >>
> >>>The blank and Tiles applications still have their own source
> >>>directoriesl. Matthias and I thought we could move the examples src
> >>>to its new location because its basically being shared by both the
> >>>examples and the new simple webapp.
> >>>
> >>>One solution to your concerns could be to move it back to the examples
> >>>app and just copy it to the simple app during the build. The build
> >>>script will have to be adjusted slightly.
> >>>
> >>>sean
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:15:33 +0100, Martin Marinschek
> >>><ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>I strongly agree with this, especially as e.g. the myfaces blank
> >>>>application should only come with its respective sources.
> >>>>
> >>>>regards,
> >>>>
> >>>>Martin
> >>>>
> >>>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:02 +0100, Manfred Geiler
> >>>><ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi all,
> >>>>>What was the reason to move the src dirs of the web applications into
> >>>>>one webapps/src dir?!
> >>>>>This breaks structure and is very confusing, IMHO. Each webapp should
> >>>>>have it's own sources, that should be clearly separated. If - for
> >>>>>non-redundancy reason - we need classes in two or more webapps we
> >>>>>should make a webapps common src dir.
> >>>>>Proposal:
> >>>>>- Leave webapp sources at /webapps/src but in different sub folders:
> >>>>> /webapps/src/examples
> >>>>> /webapps/src/tiles
> >>>>> /webapps/src/wap
> >>>>> and so on
> >>>>>- Package structure should stay the same:
> >>>>> /webapps/src/examples/org/apache/myfaces/examples
> >>>>> /webapps/src/tiles/org/apache/myfaces/tiles
> >>>>> /webapps/src/wap/org/apache/myfaces/wap
> >>>>> and so on
> >>>>>- One common webapp sources dir
> >>>>> /webapps/src/common/org/apache/myfaces/common
> >>>>>
> >>>>>-MG
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>--
> >>Matthias Weßendorf
> >>Aechterhoek 18
> >>DE-48282 Emsdetten
> >>Germany
> >>phone: +49-2572-9170275
> >>cell phone: +49-179-1118979
> >>email: matzew AT apache DOT org
> >>url: http://www.wessendorf.net
> >>callto://mwessendorf (Skype)
> >>icq: 47016183
> >>
> >
> >
>
> --
> Matthias Weßendorf
> Aechterhoek 18
> DE-48282 Emsdetten
> Germany
> phone: +49-2572-9170275
> cell phone: +49-179-1118979
> email: matzew AT apache DOT org
> url: http://www.wessendorf.net
> callto://mwessendorf (Skype)
> icq: 47016183
>
Re: Webapps src moved?!
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>.
Ok,
I did that stuff.
So please check the new CVS stuff.
BTW. now WAP-Example is only included
in myfacs-app TGZ
-Matthias
Manfred Geiler wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:13:32 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf
> <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de> wrote:
>
>>Sean,
>>
>>I am fine with
>>
>>/webapps/src/examples
>>/webapps/src/tiles
>>/webapps/src/wap
>>
>>where /webapps/src/examples
>>is also base for "simpelWebApp"
>>
>>Ok?
>>
>>-Matthias
>>
>>Sean Schofield wrote:
>>
>>>The blank and Tiles applications still have their own source
>>>directoriesl. Matthias and I thought we could move the examples src
>>>to its new location because its basically being shared by both the
>>>examples and the new simple webapp.
>>>
>>>One solution to your concerns could be to move it back to the examples
>>>app and just copy it to the simple app during the build. The build
>>>script will have to be adjusted slightly.
>>>
>>>sean
>>>
>>>
>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:15:33 +0100, Martin Marinschek
>>><ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I strongly agree with this, especially as e.g. the myfaces blank
>>>>application should only come with its respective sources.
>>>>
>>>>regards,
>>>>
>>>>Martin
>>>>
>>>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:02 +0100, Manfred Geiler
>>>><ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Hi all,
>>>>>What was the reason to move the src dirs of the web applications into
>>>>>one webapps/src dir?!
>>>>>This breaks structure and is very confusing, IMHO. Each webapp should
>>>>>have it's own sources, that should be clearly separated. If - for
>>>>>non-redundancy reason - we need classes in two or more webapps we
>>>>>should make a webapps common src dir.
>>>>>Proposal:
>>>>>- Leave webapp sources at /webapps/src but in different sub folders:
>>>>> /webapps/src/examples
>>>>> /webapps/src/tiles
>>>>> /webapps/src/wap
>>>>> and so on
>>>>>- Package structure should stay the same:
>>>>> /webapps/src/examples/org/apache/myfaces/examples
>>>>> /webapps/src/tiles/org/apache/myfaces/tiles
>>>>> /webapps/src/wap/org/apache/myfaces/wap
>>>>> and so on
>>>>>- One common webapp sources dir
>>>>> /webapps/src/common/org/apache/myfaces/common
>>>>>
>>>>>-MG
>>>>>
>>>>
>>--
>>Matthias Weßendorf
>>Aechterhoek 18
>>DE-48282 Emsdetten
>>Germany
>>phone: +49-2572-9170275
>>cell phone: +49-179-1118979
>>email: matzew AT apache DOT org
>>url: http://www.wessendorf.net
>>callto://mwessendorf (Skype)
>>icq: 47016183
>>
>
>
--
Matthias Weßendorf
Aechterhoek 18
DE-48282 Emsdetten
Germany
phone: +49-2572-9170275
cell phone: +49-179-1118979
email: matzew AT apache DOT org
url: http://www.wessendorf.net
callto://mwessendorf (Skype)
icq: 47016183
Re: Webapps src moved?!
Posted by Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 15:13:32 +0100, Matthias Wessendorf
<ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> I am fine with
>
> /webapps/src/examples
> /webapps/src/tiles
> /webapps/src/wap
>
> where /webapps/src/examples
> is also base for "simpelWebApp"
>
> Ok?
>
> -Matthias
>
> Sean Schofield wrote:
> > The blank and Tiles applications still have their own source
> > directoriesl. Matthias and I thought we could move the examples src
> > to its new location because its basically being shared by both the
> > examples and the new simple webapp.
> >
> > One solution to your concerns could be to move it back to the examples
> > app and just copy it to the simple app during the build. The build
> > script will have to be adjusted slightly.
> >
> > sean
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:15:33 +0100, Martin Marinschek
> > <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>I strongly agree with this, especially as e.g. the myfaces blank
> >>application should only come with its respective sources.
> >>
> >>regards,
> >>
> >>Martin
> >>
> >>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:02 +0100, Manfred Geiler
> >><ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi all,
> >>>What was the reason to move the src dirs of the web applications into
> >>>one webapps/src dir?!
> >>>This breaks structure and is very confusing, IMHO. Each webapp should
> >>>have it's own sources, that should be clearly separated. If - for
> >>>non-redundancy reason - we need classes in two or more webapps we
> >>>should make a webapps common src dir.
> >>>Proposal:
> >>>- Leave webapp sources at /webapps/src but in different sub folders:
> >>> /webapps/src/examples
> >>> /webapps/src/tiles
> >>> /webapps/src/wap
> >>> and so on
> >>>- Package structure should stay the same:
> >>> /webapps/src/examples/org/apache/myfaces/examples
> >>> /webapps/src/tiles/org/apache/myfaces/tiles
> >>> /webapps/src/wap/org/apache/myfaces/wap
> >>> and so on
> >>>- One common webapp sources dir
> >>> /webapps/src/common/org/apache/myfaces/common
> >>>
> >>>-MG
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> Matthias Weßendorf
> Aechterhoek 18
> DE-48282 Emsdetten
> Germany
> phone: +49-2572-9170275
> cell phone: +49-179-1118979
> email: matzew AT apache DOT org
> url: http://www.wessendorf.net
> callto://mwessendorf (Skype)
> icq: 47016183
>
Re: Webapps src moved?!
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@matthias-wessendorf.de>.
Sean,
I am fine with
/webapps/src/examples
/webapps/src/tiles
/webapps/src/wap
where /webapps/src/examples
is also base for "simpelWebApp"
Ok?
-Matthias
Sean Schofield wrote:
> The blank and Tiles applications still have their own source
> directoriesl. Matthias and I thought we could move the examples src
> to its new location because its basically being shared by both the
> examples and the new simple webapp.
>
> One solution to your concerns could be to move it back to the examples
> app and just copy it to the simple app during the build. The build
> script will have to be adjusted slightly.
>
> sean
>
>
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:15:33 +0100, Martin Marinschek
> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I strongly agree with this, especially as e.g. the myfaces blank
>>application should only come with its respective sources.
>>
>>regards,
>>
>>Martin
>>
>>On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:02 +0100, Manfred Geiler
>><ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>What was the reason to move the src dirs of the web applications into
>>>one webapps/src dir?!
>>>This breaks structure and is very confusing, IMHO. Each webapp should
>>>have it's own sources, that should be clearly separated. If - for
>>>non-redundancy reason - we need classes in two or more webapps we
>>>should make a webapps common src dir.
>>>Proposal:
>>>- Leave webapp sources at /webapps/src but in different sub folders:
>>> /webapps/src/examples
>>> /webapps/src/tiles
>>> /webapps/src/wap
>>> and so on
>>>- Package structure should stay the same:
>>> /webapps/src/examples/org/apache/myfaces/examples
>>> /webapps/src/tiles/org/apache/myfaces/tiles
>>> /webapps/src/wap/org/apache/myfaces/wap
>>> and so on
>>>- One common webapp sources dir
>>> /webapps/src/common/org/apache/myfaces/common
>>>
>>>-MG
>>>
>>
>
--
Matthias Weßendorf
Aechterhoek 18
DE-48282 Emsdetten
Germany
phone: +49-2572-9170275
cell phone: +49-179-1118979
email: matzew AT apache DOT org
url: http://www.wessendorf.net
callto://mwessendorf (Skype)
icq: 47016183
Re: Webapps src moved?!
Posted by Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>.
The blank and Tiles applications still have their own source
directoriesl. Matthias and I thought we could move the examples src
to its new location because its basically being shared by both the
examples and the new simple webapp.
One solution to your concerns could be to move it back to the examples
app and just copy it to the simple app during the build. The build
script will have to be adjusted slightly.
sean
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 12:15:33 +0100, Martin Marinschek
<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I strongly agree with this, especially as e.g. the myfaces blank
> application should only come with its respective sources.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:02 +0100, Manfred Geiler
> <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > What was the reason to move the src dirs of the web applications into
> > one webapps/src dir?!
> > This breaks structure and is very confusing, IMHO. Each webapp should
> > have it's own sources, that should be clearly separated. If - for
> > non-redundancy reason - we need classes in two or more webapps we
> > should make a webapps common src dir.
> > Proposal:
> > - Leave webapp sources at /webapps/src but in different sub folders:
> > /webapps/src/examples
> > /webapps/src/tiles
> > /webapps/src/wap
> > and so on
> > - Package structure should stay the same:
> > /webapps/src/examples/org/apache/myfaces/examples
> > /webapps/src/tiles/org/apache/myfaces/tiles
> > /webapps/src/wap/org/apache/myfaces/wap
> > and so on
> > - One common webapp sources dir
> > /webapps/src/common/org/apache/myfaces/common
> >
> > -MG
> >
>
Re: Webapps src moved?!
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
I strongly agree with this, especially as e.g. the myfaces blank
application should only come with its respective sources.
regards,
Martin
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:26:02 +0100, Manfred Geiler
<ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> What was the reason to move the src dirs of the web applications into
> one webapps/src dir?!
> This breaks structure and is very confusing, IMHO. Each webapp should
> have it's own sources, that should be clearly separated. If - for
> non-redundancy reason - we need classes in two or more webapps we
> should make a webapps common src dir.
> Proposal:
> - Leave webapp sources at /webapps/src but in different sub folders:
> /webapps/src/examples
> /webapps/src/tiles
> /webapps/src/wap
> and so on
> - Package structure should stay the same:
> /webapps/src/examples/org/apache/myfaces/examples
> /webapps/src/tiles/org/apache/myfaces/tiles
> /webapps/src/wap/org/apache/myfaces/wap
> and so on
> - One common webapp sources dir
> /webapps/src/common/org/apache/myfaces/common
>
> -MG
>