Re: [DISCUSSION] Dropping support for Hadoop 1.0 in 0.98

[Nicolas Liochon <nk...@gmail.com>]

+1
Le 31 oct. 2014 23:49, "Andrew Purtell" <ap...@apache.org> a écrit :

> Based on the positive responses thus far, and unless we see an objection
> between now and then, I plan to resolve HBASE-12397 next week by removing
> support in 0.98 branch for Hadoop 1.0 (but not Hadoop 1.1) in time for
> release 0.98.8.
>
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Adding user@.
> >
> > I would +1 this motion.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1, presuming we wouldn't change our position on hadoop 1.0 for 0.94.
> > >
> > > For the curious, here is the full support matrix Andrew is referencing:
> > > http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#d0e1440
> > >
> > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No, we'll still need a -hadoop1 and -hadoop2 munged build of 0.98.
> I'm
> > > only
> > > > suggesting removing support for version 1.0. Other version 1.x would
> > > remain
> > > > active in the compatibility list.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <cos@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Absolutely makes sense! it will make a lot of things easier,
> really.
> > > The
> > > > > infamous need for classifiers will finally go away!
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:56AM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> > > > > > Hadoop 1.0 is an ancient, and I believe dead, version that
> > certainly
> > > > > nobody
> > > > > > should use today. We have a chronic problem on the 0.98 branch
> with
> > > > > changes
> > > > > > tested on only Hadoop 2 later are found to break builds against
> > > Hadoop
> > > > 1,
> > > > > > since only 0.94 and 0.98 still support Hadoop 1.x. See
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-12397 as an example.
> > > This
> > > > > issue
> > > > > > also illustrates that dropping support for 1.0 while retaining
> > > support
> > > > > for
> > > > > > 1.1 and later versions of Hadoop 1.x can reduce cross-version
> > > > > compatibility
> > > > > > complexity for at least the API involved in that issue, and
> > certainly
> > > > > > others. This in my opinion is a good thing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >    - Andy
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. -
> Piet
> > > > Hein
> > > > > > (via Tom White)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >    - Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Sean
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>    - Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>