You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by David Reid <dr...@jetnet.co.uk> on 2001/07/31 12:15:39 UTC
SSL...
Can we add some sample config into httpd.conf for SSL on 2.0?
In some of the examples I saw for 1.3 the session cache used dbm, but as
beos doesn't have dbm but does have sdbm, could that be used instead? I got
errors when trying to configure using it, hence the question.
However, it builds and runs on beos :) Another first...
david
Re: SSL...
Posted by David Reid <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>.
It's the config option...
dbm:Blah
Throws up an error in the log...
I'll review and see what's going on but I agree that I expected it to use
apr_dbm and hence no issue should exist. Hence my question and your
response :)
david
> > Can we add some sample config into httpd.conf for SSL on 2.0?
> > In some of the examples I saw for 1.3 the session cache used dbm, but as
> > beos doesn't have dbm but does have sdbm, could that be used instead? I
got
> > errors when trying to configure using it, hence the question.
>
> A very dumb question ... everyone _should_ have apr_dbm? I understood
that it
> was already converted for apr_dbm (which can derive from apr_sdbm...)
>
> Where is Beos broken here?
>
> > However, it builds and runs on beos :) Another first...
>
> Hoorah!
>
>
Re: SSL...
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
From: "David Reid" <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:15 AM
> Can we add some sample config into httpd.conf for SSL on 2.0?
> In some of the examples I saw for 1.3 the session cache used dbm, but as
> beos doesn't have dbm but does have sdbm, could that be used instead? I got
> errors when trying to configure using it, hence the question.
A very dumb question ... everyone _should_ have apr_dbm? I understood that it
was already converted for apr_dbm (which can derive from apr_sdbm...)
Where is Beos broken here?
> However, it builds and runs on beos :) Another first...
Hoorah!