Re: CLOSED: Closing the infrastructure list ( was RE: infrastructure@ missing from eyebrowse )

["Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@apache.org>]

He cannot take it up on community@  -- that list is closed as well. 
He's not a committer.

Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> 
>>Open & Closedness of the ASF
> 
> 
> This is a very useful and valuable discussion - but this is not the right
> place. I'd really encourage you folks to pick up the thread again on
> community@ - which is exactly for this type of dilemma's and ethics. I'll
> promise I'll add a few words of my own when it pops up there.
> 
> But for this list it is out of scope.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dw
> 
> 
> 
> 

Re: CLOSED: Closing the infrastructure list ( was RE: infrastructure@ missing from eyebrowse )

[Steven Noels <st...@outerthought.org>]

Andrew C. Oliver wrote:

> He cannot take it up on community@  -- that list is closed as well.
> He's not a committer.

My memory can be very bad, but I believe we said community@ could also 
be 'by invitation'. Given Tim's pertinent remarks and apparent genuine 
interest in our operations, we could allow him on the community list.

</Steven>
-- 
Steven Noels                            http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
Read my weblog at            http://blogs.cocoondev.org/stevenn/
stevenn at outerthought.org                stevenn at apache.org

Re: CLOSED: Closing the infrastructure list.

[Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>]

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:

> He cannot take it up on community@  -- that list is closed as well.
> He's not a committer.

Though. But that is not an @infrastructure problem.

If the community decides to have a different moderation on community@ or
new mailing list with different semantics;  please let infrastructure@
know as soon as there is consensus and it will be set up right away.

Dw

Re: CLOSED: Closing the infrastructure list ( was RE: infrastructure@ missing from eyebrowse )

[Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>]

Too bad, the community@ list advocated it and should therefore maintain
it. You're welcome to call a vote to invite him (here's my +1)

-aaron


On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 06:06  AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:

> He cannot take it up on community@  -- that list is closed as well. 
> He's not a committer.
>
> Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>> Folks,
>>> Open & Closedness of the ASF
>> This is a very useful and valuable discussion - but this is not the 
>> right
>> place. I'd really encourage you folks to pick up the thread again on
>> community@ - which is exactly for this type of dilemma's and ethics. 
>> I'll
>> promise I'll add a few words of my own when it pops up there.
>> But for this list it is out of scope.
>> Thanks,
>> Dw
>
>