You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "Cheng,Fuesane" <FC...@travelers.com> on 2010/07/26 22:31:30 UTC
RE: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.6?
Hi:
There are errors with HBase.rb line 554 in 'get': undefined method 'to_java_bytes'. Will this be fixed in Hbase-0.20.6? The shell command 'get' for multiple columns does not work.
Fuesane Cheng
-----Original Message-----
From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:38 PM
To: dev@hbase.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 as hbase-0.20.6?
That sounds like a +1 to me (smile).
St.Ack
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Dave Latham <la...@davelink.net> wrote:
> For what it's worth, I've been running the 0.20 branch at r963948, which is
> the same as this release candidate except for
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2837. Haven't had any problems.
>
> Dave
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>
>> I've posted an hbase 0.20.6 release candidate 5 here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/>
>>
>> There have been 8 fixes since the release of hbase-0.20.5 [1].
>>
>> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.6?
>>
>> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>> Monday July 26th.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Your HBase Team
>>
>> 1. http://su.pr/1kRdZN
>>
>
==============================================================================
This communication, including attachments, is confidential, may be subject to legal privileges, and is intended for the sole use of the addressee. Any use, duplication, disclosure or dissemination of this communication, other than by the addressee, is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or destroy this communication and all copies.
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.6?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
Hey Ted:
I don't think issues in shell, usually, are of substance enough to
sink a release.
Can you be more specific in HBASE-2885? As filed, its a bit of a
grab-all of recent issues up in the mailing list. We can do a 0.20.7
soon after 0.20.6 no problem.
St.Ack
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can someone take a look at:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2885
>
> I think the three reported incidents were somehow related.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Cheng,Fuesane <FC...@travelers.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi:
>>
>> There are errors with HBase.rb line 554 in 'get': undefined method
>> 'to_java_bytes'. Will this be fixed in Hbase-0.20.6? The shell command 'get'
>> for multiple columns does not work.
>>
>> Fuesane Cheng
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:38 PM
>> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 as
>> hbase-0.20.6?
>>
>> That sounds like a +1 to me (smile).
>> St.Ack
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Dave Latham <la...@davelink.net> wrote:
>> > For what it's worth, I've been running the 0.20 branch at r963948, which
>> is
>> > the same as this release candidate except for
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2837. Haven't had any
>> problems.
>> >
>> > Dave
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I've posted an hbase 0.20.6 release candidate 5 here:
>> >>
>> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/>
>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/>
>> >>
>> >> There have been 8 fixes since the release of hbase-0.20.5 [1].
>> >>
>> >> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.6?
>> >>
>> >> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
>> >> Monday July 26th.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Your HBase Team
>> >>
>> >> 1. http://su.pr/1kRdZN
>> >>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> This communication, including attachments, is confidential, may be subject
>> to legal privileges, and is intended for the sole use of the addressee. Any
>> use, duplication, disclosure or dissemination of this communication, other
>> than by the addressee, is prohibited. If you have received this
>> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or
>> destroy this communication and all copies.
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.6?
Posted by Ted Yu <yu...@gmail.com>.
Can someone take a look at:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2885
I think the three reported incidents were somehow related.
Thanks
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Cheng,Fuesane <FC...@travelers.com> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> There are errors with HBase.rb line 554 in 'get': undefined method
> 'to_java_bytes'. Will this be fixed in Hbase-0.20.6? The shell command 'get'
> for multiple columns does not work.
>
> Fuesane Cheng
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: saint.ack@gmail.com [mailto:saint.ack@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Stack
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 1:38 PM
> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 as
> hbase-0.20.6?
>
> That sounds like a +1 to me (smile).
> St.Ack
>
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Dave Latham <la...@davelink.net> wrote:
> > For what it's worth, I've been running the 0.20 branch at r963948, which
> is
> > the same as this release candidate except for
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-2837. Haven't had any
> problems.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I've posted an hbase 0.20.6 release candidate 5 here:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~stack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Estack/hbase-0.20.6-candidate-1/>
> >>
> >> There have been 8 fixes since the release of hbase-0.20.5 [1].
> >>
> >> Should we release this candidate as hbase 0.20.6?
> >>
> >> Please take it for a test spin if you have a chance. Vote closes
> >> Monday July 26th.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Your HBase Team
> >>
> >> 1. http://su.pr/1kRdZN
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> ==============================================================================
> This communication, including attachments, is confidential, may be subject
> to legal privileges, and is intended for the sole use of the addressee. Any
> use, duplication, disclosure or dissemination of this communication, other
> than by the addressee, is prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete or
> destroy this communication and all copies.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Shall we release hbase-0.20.6 Release Candidate 1 as
hbase-0.20.6?
Posted by Stack <st...@duboce.net>.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Cheng,Fuesane <FC...@travelers.com> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> There are errors with HBase.rb line 554 in 'get': undefined method 'to_java_bytes'. Will this be fixed in Hbase-0.20.6? The shell command 'get' for multiple columns does not work.
>
I don't think the above a blocker so insufficient sinking the
candidate. We can fix in 0.20.7?
I'm +1 on releasing 0.20.6RC1 as 0.20.6. I downloaded it, ran it and
checked documentation. I'd run the candidate up on cluster and it
seemed no different to previous 0.20 releases.
St.Ack