You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jclouds.apache.org by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org> on 2015/02/20 10:03:39 UTC
Working on Azure compute provider
Hi JClouds community,
I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with
target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team with a
focus on Azure.
Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to change
the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles I've
found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test execution.
WDYT?
Regards.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
[2]
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
[3]
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
[4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: Working on Azure compute provider
Posted by Fabio Martelli <fa...@gmail.com>.
Il 20/02/2015 10:03, Francesco Chicchiriccò ha scritto:
> Hi JClouds community,
> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with
> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team with
> a focus on Azure.
Hi All, like as Francesco, I'm going to contribute to the Azure provider
as part of the same team.
I'm looking forward for a preliminary coordination phase.
Regards,
F.
>
> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to change
> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
>
> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles
> I've found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test
> execution.
> WDYT?
>
> Regards.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
> [2]
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
> [3]
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
>
--
Fabio Martelli
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Apache Syncope PMC
http://people.apache.org/~fmartelli/
RE: Working on Azure compute provider
Posted by "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)" <Ro...@microsoft.com>.
Set up a GitHub user for this kid and subscribe ot to the project?
Sent from my Windows Phone
________________________________
From: Francesco Chicchiriccò<ma...@apache.org>
Sent: 2/27/2015 7:54 AM
To: dev@jclouds.apache.org<ma...@jclouds.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Working on Azure compute provider
Hi there!
Looks like PR 135 was merged today:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#issuecomment-76381931
That's good: we will re-base our work on updated jclouds-labs master
branch and move forward (still having troubles with live tests, but
making some progresses).
Can we move here at dev@ discussions like the one above or at least ask
infra to setup some sort of github PR mirroring?
It would help keeping track of ongoing development efforts (you know,
"If it didn't happen on a mailing list, it didn't happen"...).
What about opening residual issues as we've been discussing below?
Thanks!
Regards.
On 24/02/2015 15:45, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
> Sure. I'll have a look at it later today and merge it if everything
> looks good. Let's move forward!
>
> On 24 February 2015 at 15:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò
> <il...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 24/02/2015 15:25, Andrea Turli wrote:
>>> Francesco,
>>> thanks for your update and for your effort!
>>>
>>> I think #135 is almost ready to be merged, I think we are waiting to close
>>> the main pending discussion on
>>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#discussion-diff-24976668
>>
>> What about merging #135 as is and moving the discussion mentioned above into
>> a new JIRA issue (linked to or as subtask of) JCLOUDS-664?
>>
>>> I like both the idea of splitting JCLOUDS-164 in multiple subtasks or
>>> simply create a new set of JIRA ISSUES to improve Azure compute
>>> implmentation.
>>
>> Anything goes to me, good!
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>>> On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 2:16:54 PM Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>> <il...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> a quick update on ours (Fabio's and mine) current activities.
>>>>
>>>> First of all, we are basing our work on PR #135 rather than
>>>> jclouds-labs' master, since the former contains a whole set of fixes and
>>>> new features, and is in turn based on the latter.
>>>> About this, is anyone able to provide a sneak peek on expected actual
>>>> merge timeframe? From the e-mail below it seems quite soon.
>>>>
>>>> We are currently trying to make all live tests succeeding with an actual
>>>> Azure instance: this is the initial main purpose of our contribution,
>>>> and will constitute the ground of our first pull request.
>>>>
>>>> (Incidentally, I remember that there are free MSDN subscriptions
>>>> available - including Azure - for ASF committers; see
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-
>>>> licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
>>>> for details)
>>>>
>>>> The intention is then to move from there by identifying some subtasks of
>>>> JCLOUDS-664 for each specific item.
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>> On 20/02/2015 10:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>>>> On 20/02/2015 10:13, Andrea Turli wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for your interest in jclouds!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we are
>>>>>> working hard to improve it.
>>>>>> You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple of
>>>>>> pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the
>>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter [2]
>>>>> Hi Andrea, I am aware of course of the recent "Azure SDK Vs REST"
>>>>> discussion, and I also know that at the end the REST option was
>>>>> preferred.
>>>>>
>>>>>> As [2] will be soon merged, I think we could wait for #135 and then
>>>>>> rebase
>>>>>> your #137 on it, if it is still needed.
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>> This sounds reasonable: I think we should coordinate our work (even by
>>>>> opening some subtasks of JCLOUDS-664) in order to avoid latency and
>>>>> being as much effective as possible.
>>>>> How would do you see this?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Feel free to join IRC #jclouds to discuss better next steps!
>>>>> I'm already there :-)
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg05877.html
>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:03:45 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>>>> <il...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi JClouds community,
>>>>>>> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with
>>>>>>> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team
>>>>>>> with a
>>>>>>> focus on Azure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
>>>>>>> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to change
>>>>>>> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles
>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>> found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test
>>>>>>> execution.
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/
>>>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/
>>>>>>> AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
>>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
>>>>>>> http://www.tirasa.net/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
>>>>>>> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: Working on Azure compute provider
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
Hi there!
Looks like PR 135 was merged today:
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#issuecomment-76381931
That's good: we will re-base our work on updated jclouds-labs master
branch and move forward (still having troubles with live tests, but
making some progresses).
Can we move here at dev@ discussions like the one above or at least ask
infra to setup some sort of github PR mirroring?
It would help keeping track of ongoing development efforts (you know,
"If it didn't happen on a mailing list, it didn't happen"...).
What about opening residual issues as we've been discussing below?
Thanks!
Regards.
On 24/02/2015 15:45, Ignasi Barrera wrote:
> Sure. I'll have a look at it later today and merge it if everything
> looks good. Let's move forward!
>
> On 24 February 2015 at 15:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò
> <il...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On 24/02/2015 15:25, Andrea Turli wrote:
>>> Francesco,
>>> thanks for your update and for your effort!
>>>
>>> I think #135 is almost ready to be merged, I think we are waiting to close
>>> the main pending discussion on
>>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#discussion-diff-24976668
>>
>> What about merging #135 as is and moving the discussion mentioned above into
>> a new JIRA issue (linked to or as subtask of) JCLOUDS-664?
>>
>>> I like both the idea of splitting JCLOUDS-164 in multiple subtasks or
>>> simply create a new set of JIRA ISSUES to improve Azure compute
>>> implmentation.
>>
>> Anything goes to me, good!
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>>> On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 2:16:54 PM Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>> <il...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> a quick update on ours (Fabio's and mine) current activities.
>>>>
>>>> First of all, we are basing our work on PR #135 rather than
>>>> jclouds-labs' master, since the former contains a whole set of fixes and
>>>> new features, and is in turn based on the latter.
>>>> About this, is anyone able to provide a sneak peek on expected actual
>>>> merge timeframe? From the e-mail below it seems quite soon.
>>>>
>>>> We are currently trying to make all live tests succeeding with an actual
>>>> Azure instance: this is the initial main purpose of our contribution,
>>>> and will constitute the ground of our first pull request.
>>>>
>>>> (Incidentally, I remember that there are free MSDN subscriptions
>>>> available - including Azure - for ASF committers; see
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-
>>>> licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
>>>> for details)
>>>>
>>>> The intention is then to move from there by identifying some subtasks of
>>>> JCLOUDS-664 for each specific item.
>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>> On 20/02/2015 10:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>>>> On 20/02/2015 10:13, Andrea Turli wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Francesco,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks for your interest in jclouds!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we are
>>>>>> working hard to improve it.
>>>>>> You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple of
>>>>>> pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the
>>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter [2]
>>>>> Hi Andrea, I am aware of course of the recent "Azure SDK Vs REST"
>>>>> discussion, and I also know that at the end the REST option was
>>>>> preferred.
>>>>>
>>>>>> As [2] will be soon merged, I think we could wait for #135 and then
>>>>>> rebase
>>>>>> your #137 on it, if it is still needed.
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>> This sounds reasonable: I think we should coordinate our work (even by
>>>>> opening some subtasks of JCLOUDS-664) in order to avoid latency and
>>>>> being as much effective as possible.
>>>>> How would do you see this?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Feel free to join IRC #jclouds to discuss better next steps!
>>>>> I'm already there :-)
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg05877.html
>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:03:45 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>>>> <il...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi JClouds community,
>>>>>>> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with
>>>>>>> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team
>>>>>>> with a
>>>>>>> focus on Azure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
>>>>>>> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to change
>>>>>>> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles
>>>>>>> I've
>>>>>>> found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test
>>>>>>> execution.
>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/
>>>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/
>>>>>>> AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
>>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
>>>>>>> http://www.tirasa.net/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
>>>>>>> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: Working on Azure compute provider
Posted by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org>.
Sure. I'll have a look at it later today and merge it if everything
looks good. Let's move forward!
On 24 February 2015 at 15:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò
<il...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 24/02/2015 15:25, Andrea Turli wrote:
>>
>> Francesco,
>> thanks for your update and for your effort!
>>
>> I think #135 is almost ready to be merged, I think we are waiting to close
>> the main pending discussion on
>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#discussion-diff-24976668
>
>
> What about merging #135 as is and moving the discussion mentioned above into
> a new JIRA issue (linked to or as subtask of) JCLOUDS-664?
>
>> I like both the idea of splitting JCLOUDS-164 in multiple subtasks or
>> simply create a new set of JIRA ISSUES to improve Azure compute
>> implmentation.
>
>
> Anything goes to me, good!
> Regards.
>
>
>> On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 2:16:54 PM Francesco Chicchiriccò
>> <il...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> a quick update on ours (Fabio's and mine) current activities.
>>>
>>> First of all, we are basing our work on PR #135 rather than
>>> jclouds-labs' master, since the former contains a whole set of fixes and
>>> new features, and is in turn based on the latter.
>>> About this, is anyone able to provide a sneak peek on expected actual
>>> merge timeframe? From the e-mail below it seems quite soon.
>>>
>>> We are currently trying to make all live tests succeeding with an actual
>>> Azure instance: this is the initial main purpose of our contribution,
>>> and will constitute the ground of our first pull request.
>>>
>>> (Incidentally, I remember that there are free MSDN subscriptions
>>> available - including Azure - for ASF committers; see
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-
>>> licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
>>> for details)
>>>
>>> The intention is then to move from there by identifying some subtasks of
>>> JCLOUDS-664 for each specific item.
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> On 20/02/2015 10:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 20/02/2015 10:13, Andrea Turli wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Francesco,
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks for your interest in jclouds!
>>>>>
>>>>> Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we are
>>>>> working hard to improve it.
>>>>> You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple of
>>>>> pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the
>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter [2]
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andrea, I am aware of course of the recent "Azure SDK Vs REST"
>>>> discussion, and I also know that at the end the REST option was
>>>> preferred.
>>>>
>>>>> As [2] will be soon merged, I think we could wait for #135 and then
>>>>> rebase
>>>>> your #137 on it, if it is still needed.
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>
>>>> This sounds reasonable: I think we should coordinate our work (even by
>>>> opening some subtasks of JCLOUDS-664) in order to avoid latency and
>>>> being as much effective as possible.
>>>> How would do you see this?
>>>>
>>>>> Feel free to join IRC #jclouds to discuss better next steps!
>>>>
>>>> I'm already there :-)
>>>> Regards.
>>>>
>>>>> [1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg05877.html
>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:03:45 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>>> <il...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi JClouds community,
>>>>>> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with
>>>>>> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team
>>>>>> with a
>>>>>> focus on Azure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
>>>>>> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to change
>>>>>> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles
>>>>>> I've
>>>>>> found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test
>>>>>> execution.
>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/
>>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/
>>>>>> AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
>>>>>> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
>
>
> --
> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>
> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> http://www.tirasa.net/
>
> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>
Re: Working on Azure compute provider
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
On 24/02/2015 15:25, Andrea Turli wrote:
> Francesco,
> thanks for your update and for your effort!
>
> I think #135 is almost ready to be merged, I think we are waiting to close
> the main pending discussion on
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#discussion-diff-24976668
What about merging #135 as is and moving the discussion mentioned above
into a new JIRA issue (linked to or as subtask of) JCLOUDS-664?
> I like both the idea of splitting JCLOUDS-164 in multiple subtasks or
> simply create a new set of JIRA ISSUES to improve Azure compute
> implmentation.
Anything goes to me, good!
Regards.
> On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 2:16:54 PM Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> a quick update on ours (Fabio's and mine) current activities.
>>
>> First of all, we are basing our work on PR #135 rather than
>> jclouds-labs' master, since the former contains a whole set of fixes and
>> new features, and is in turn based on the latter.
>> About this, is anyone able to provide a sneak peek on expected actual
>> merge timeframe? From the e-mail below it seems quite soon.
>>
>> We are currently trying to make all live tests succeeding with an actual
>> Azure instance: this is the initial main purpose of our contribution,
>> and will constitute the ground of our first pull request.
>>
>> (Incidentally, I remember that there are free MSDN subscriptions
>> available - including Azure - for ASF committers; see
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-
>> licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
>> for details)
>>
>> The intention is then to move from there by identifying some subtasks of
>> JCLOUDS-664 for each specific item.
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> On 20/02/2015 10:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>> On 20/02/2015 10:13, Andrea Turli wrote:
>>>> Hi Francesco,
>>>>
>>>> thanks for your interest in jclouds!
>>>>
>>>> Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we are
>>>> working hard to improve it.
>>>> You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple of
>>>> pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the
>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter [2]
>>> Hi Andrea, I am aware of course of the recent "Azure SDK Vs REST"
>>> discussion, and I also know that at the end the REST option was
>>> preferred.
>>>
>>>> As [2] will be soon merged, I think we could wait for #135 and then
>>>> rebase
>>>> your #137 on it, if it is still needed.
>>>> WDYT?
>>> This sounds reasonable: I think we should coordinate our work (even by
>>> opening some subtasks of JCLOUDS-664) in order to avoid latency and
>>> being as much effective as possible.
>>> How would do you see this?
>>>
>>>> Feel free to join IRC #jclouds to discuss better next steps!
>>> I'm already there :-)
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>>> [1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg05877.html
>>>> [2]: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135
>>>>
>>>> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:03:45 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò
>>>> <il...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi JClouds community,
>>>>> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with
>>>>> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team
>>>>> with a
>>>>> focus on Azure.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
>>>>> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to change
>>>>> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
>>>>>
>>>>> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles I've
>>>>> found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test
>>>>> execution.
>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
>>>>> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/
>>>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
>>>>> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/
>>>>> AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
>>>>> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: Working on Azure compute provider
Posted by Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com>.
Francesco,
thanks for your update and for your effort!
I think #135 is almost ready to be merged, I think we are waiting to close
the main pending discussion on
https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135#discussion-diff-24976668
I like both the idea of splitting JCLOUDS-164 in multiple subtasks or
simply create a new set of JIRA ISSUES to improve Azure compute
implmentation.
Best,
Andrea
On Tue Feb 24 2015 at 2:16:54 PM Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi all,
> a quick update on ours (Fabio's and mine) current activities.
>
> First of all, we are basing our work on PR #135 rather than
> jclouds-labs' master, since the former contains a whole set of fixes and
> new features, and is in turn based on the latter.
> About this, is anyone able to provide a sneak peek on expected actual
> merge timeframe? From the e-mail below it seems quite soon.
>
> We are currently trying to make all live tests succeeding with an actual
> Azure instance: this is the initial main purpose of our contribution,
> and will constitute the ground of our first pull request.
>
> (Incidentally, I remember that there are free MSDN subscriptions
> available - including Azure - for ASF committers; see
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-
> licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
> for details)
>
> The intention is then to move from there by identifying some subtasks of
> JCLOUDS-664 for each specific item.
> WDYT?
>
> Regards.
>
> On 20/02/2015 10:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> > On 20/02/2015 10:13, Andrea Turli wrote:
> >> Hi Francesco,
> >>
> >> thanks for your interest in jclouds!
> >>
> >> Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we are
> >> working hard to improve it.
> >> You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple of
> >> pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the
> >> AzureComputeServiceAdapter [2]
> >
> > Hi Andrea, I am aware of course of the recent "Azure SDK Vs REST"
> > discussion, and I also know that at the end the REST option was
> > preferred.
> >
> >> As [2] will be soon merged, I think we could wait for #135 and then
> >> rebase
> >> your #137 on it, if it is still needed.
> >> WDYT?
> >
> > This sounds reasonable: I think we should coordinate our work (even by
> > opening some subtasks of JCLOUDS-664) in order to avoid latency and
> > being as much effective as possible.
> > How would do you see this?
> >
> >> Feel free to join IRC #jclouds to discuss better next steps!
> >
> > I'm already there :-)
> > Regards.
> >
> >> [1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg05877.html
> >> [2]: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135
> >>
> >> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:03:45 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò
> >> <il...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi JClouds community,
> >>> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with
> >>> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team
> >>> with a
> >>> focus on Azure.
> >>>
> >>> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
> >>> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to change
> >>> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
> >>>
> >>> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles I've
> >>> found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test
> >>> execution.
> >>> WDYT?
> >>>
> >>> Regards.
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
> >>> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
> >>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/
> >>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
> >>> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
> >>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/
> >>> AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
> >>> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
>
> --
> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>
> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> http://www.tirasa.net/
>
> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>
>
Re: Working on Azure compute provider
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
Hi all,
a quick update on ours (Fabio's and mine) current activities.
First of all, we are basing our work on PR #135 rather than
jclouds-labs' master, since the former contains a whole set of fixes and
new features, and is in turn based on the latter.
About this, is anyone able to provide a sneak peek on expected actual
merge timeframe? From the e-mail below it seems quite soon.
We are currently trying to make all live tests succeeding with an actual
Azure instance: this is the initial main purpose of our contribution,
and will constitute the ground of our first pull request.
(Incidentally, I remember that there are free MSDN subscriptions
available - including Azure - for ASF committers; see
https://svn.apache.org/repos/private/committers/donated-licenses/msdn-license-grants.txt
for details)
The intention is then to move from there by identifying some subtasks of
JCLOUDS-664 for each specific item.
WDYT?
Regards.
On 20/02/2015 10:45, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 20/02/2015 10:13, Andrea Turli wrote:
>> Hi Francesco,
>>
>> thanks for your interest in jclouds!
>>
>> Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we are
>> working hard to improve it.
>> You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple of
>> pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the
>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter [2]
>
> Hi Andrea, I am aware of course of the recent "Azure SDK Vs REST"
> discussion, and I also know that at the end the REST option was
> preferred.
>
>> As [2] will be soon merged, I think we could wait for #135 and then
>> rebase
>> your #137 on it, if it is still needed.
>> WDYT?
>
> This sounds reasonable: I think we should coordinate our work (even by
> opening some subtasks of JCLOUDS-664) in order to avoid latency and
> being as much effective as possible.
> How would do you see this?
>
>> Feel free to join IRC #jclouds to discuss better next steps!
>
> I'm already there :-)
> Regards.
>
>> [1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg05877.html
>> [2]: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135
>>
>> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:03:45 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò
>> <il...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi JClouds community,
>>> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with
>>> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team
>>> with a
>>> focus on Azure.
>>>
>>> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
>>> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to change
>>> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
>>>
>>> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles I've
>>> found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test
>>> execution.
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Regards.
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
>>> [2] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/
>>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
>>> [3] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/
>>> AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
>>> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: Working on Azure compute provider
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
On 20/02/2015 10:13, Andrea Turli wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
>
> thanks for your interest in jclouds!
>
> Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we are
> working hard to improve it.
> You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple of
> pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the
> AzureComputeServiceAdapter [2]
Hi Andrea, I am aware of course of the recent "Azure SDK Vs REST"
discussion, and I also know that at the end the REST option was preferred.
> As [2] will be soon merged, I think we could wait for #135 and then rebase
> your #137 on it, if it is still needed.
> WDYT?
This sounds reasonable: I think we should coordinate our work (even by
opening some subtasks of JCLOUDS-664) in order to avoid latency and
being as much effective as possible.
How would do you see this?
> Feel free to join IRC #jclouds to discuss better next steps!
I'm already there :-)
Regards.
> [1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg05877.html
> [2]: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135
>
> On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:03:45 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi JClouds community,
>> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with
>> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team with a
>> focus on Azure.
>>
>> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
>> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to change
>> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
>>
>> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles I've
>> found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test execution.
>> WDYT?
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
>> [2]
>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/
>> AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
>> [3]
>> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
>> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/
>> AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
>> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: Working on Azure compute provider
Posted by Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com>.
Hi Francesco,
thanks for your interest in jclouds!
Azure Compute implementation is under the spot these days and we are
working hard to improve it.
You may be aware of [1] and moreover there are currently a couple of
pending PRs which are providing an initial implementation of the
AzureComputeServiceAdapter [2]
As [2] will be soon merged, I think we could wait for #135 and then rebase
your #137 on it, if it is still needed.
WDYT?
Feel free to join IRC #jclouds to discuss better next steps!
Best,
Andrea
[1]: http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@jclouds.apache.org/msg05877.html
[2]: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/135
On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 10:03:45 AM Francesco Chicchiriccò <
ilgrosso@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi JClouds community,
> I am interested in contributing to the Azure compute provider with
> target of completing its implementation, as part of Eduard's team with a
> focus on Azure.
>
> Is there anyone actively working on this [1]?
> I see as initial directions to implement methods in [2] and to change
> the deprecated implementations in [3]: am I missing something?
>
> I have prepared a first pull request [4] which fixes some troubles I've
> found with live (e.g. against an actual Azure subscription) test execution.
> WDYT?
>
> Regards.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-664
> [2]
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/compute/
> AzureComputeServiceAdapter.java
> [3]
> https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/blob/master/
> azurecompute/src/main/java/org/jclouds/azurecompute/config/
> AzureComputeHttpApiModule.java
> [4] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs/pull/137
>
> --
> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>
> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
> http://www.tirasa.net/
>
> Involved at The Apache Software Foundation:
> member, Syncope PMC chair, Cocoon PMC, Olingo PMC
> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>
>
>