You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@turbine.apache.org by Herr Mats Nyberg <ma...@yahoo.com> on 2002/01/01 23:20:31 UTC
Re: JDO versus Torque
interresting,
i just found out about torque and am still trying to
figure out the maechanics but,
could you (ian) tell me something about the
'resrtictions' of castor vs torque? i didn't know
there were any ;)
(philip) i read on their site on the subject of EJB vs
JDO that EJB required byte code manipulation whereas
JDO didn't. would you elaborate on that?
-----Original Message-----
From: Ian Lim [mailto:mallim@ematic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:31 PM
To: Turbine Users List
Subject: Re: JDO versus Torque
Hi
Not to be too restrictive. You can consider a strategy
1. Torque
2. Castor (if some of the restrictions is not a
concern to you)
Before diving in to more primitive APIs...
Regards
==========
Ian Lim
email: mallim_sg@yahoo.com.sg
homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Phillip Rhodes" <rh...@yahoo.com>
To: "Turbine Users List"
<tu...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 07:21 AM
Subject: Re: JDO versus Torque
> Their JDO implementation does bytecode manipulation
to mark classes as
> persistence, whereas, torque/peers is a code
generator.
>
> I have worked with JDO, castor and torque and at
this point I would
> recommend torque.
>
> At 02:01 PM 12/6/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Does anyone have any experiences with JDO versus
Torque?
> >
> >I was playing with Forte as my IDE for my Turbine
projects, and ran
across
> >their information on Transaparent Persitence.. Is
JDO doing under
the
> >covers the same things that Torque does?
> >
> >Eric
> >
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >For additional commands, e-mail:
> ><ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at
http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
=====
Mats Nyberg
St Gråbrödersgatan 3C
222 22 Lund
SWEDEN
+46 (0)46 15 28 44 hem
+70 672 01 09 mobben
_____________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
se.yahoo.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
Re: JDO versus Torque
Posted by Ian Lim <ma...@ematic.com>.
Hi Herr
I just list out some of the points I came across.
1) Castor support in-memory cache. You can supply the parameters
on the mapping xml. Torque has yet to implement in-memory cache.
2) Torque helps you to generate quite a comprehensive set of java sources.
Castor XML schema although would be able to do the same. But
it is not directly usable by its Castor JDO. I have tried to use Torque's
generated java sources, wrote a Castor mapping on it and actually
run it against Castor. However, Torque's generated classes does not
implement
Serializable, so cannot be use to implement stateless session bean.
3) Castor JDO does not support inheritance and self referencing very well.
I believe Torque has a better support in generating classes regarding this
two aspects.
Just some of my opinions :)
Happy New Year
==========
Ian Lim
email: mallim_sg@yahoo.com.sg
homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Herr Mats Nyberg" <ma...@yahoo.com>
To: <tu...@jakarta.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 06:20 AM
Subject: Re: JDO versus Torque
> interresting,
>
> i just found out about torque and am still trying to
> figure out the maechanics but,
>
> could you (ian) tell me something about the
> 'resrtictions' of castor vs torque? i didn't know
> there were any ;)
>
>
> (philip) i read on their site on the subject of EJB vs
> JDO that EJB required byte code manipulation whereas
> JDO didn't. would you elaborate on that?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Lim [mailto:mallim@ematic.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 4:31 PM
> To: Turbine Users List
> Subject: Re: JDO versus Torque
>
>
> Hi
>
> Not to be too restrictive. You can consider a strategy
> 1. Torque
> 2. Castor (if some of the restrictions is not a
> concern to you)
>
> Before diving in to more primitive APIs...
>
> Regards
> ==========
> Ian Lim
> email: mallim_sg@yahoo.com.sg
> homepage: http://www.webappcabaret.com/mallim
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Phillip Rhodes" <rh...@yahoo.com>
> To: "Turbine Users List"
> <tu...@jakarta.apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 07:21 AM
> Subject: Re: JDO versus Torque
>
>
> > Their JDO implementation does bytecode manipulation
> to mark classes as
> > persistence, whereas, torque/peers is a code
> generator.
> >
> > I have worked with JDO, castor and torque and at
> this point I would
> > recommend torque.
> >
> > At 02:01 PM 12/6/2001 -0500, you wrote:
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Does anyone have any experiences with JDO versus
> Torque?
> > >
> > >I was playing with Forte as my IDE for my Turbine
> projects, and ran
> across
> > >their information on Transaparent Persitence.. Is
> JDO doing under
> the
> > >covers the same things that Torque does?
> > >
> > >Eric
> > >
> > >--
> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >For additional commands, e-mail:
> > ><ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
> >
> _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at
> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
>
>
>
> =====
> Mats Nyberg
> St Gråbrödersgatan 3C
> 222 22 Lund
> SWEDEN
> +46 (0)46 15 28 44 hem
> +70 672 01 09 mobben
>
>
> _____________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> se.yahoo.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
<ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>