2.2.4

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
to be approved, and others which look VERY worthwhile
to be in this version. Let's all take some time and
look over them ;)

Re: 2.2.4

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
> There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
> to be approved, and others which look VERY worthwhile
> to be in this version. Let's all take some time and
> look over them ;)

Well, I'm a little confused, post-midmonth isn't what I describe
as 'early' :)  Any update?

If it's inconvient for you at this point, would anyone object if I pulled
a 2.2.4 tag between Sun/Mon?  Not that we don't have many more good changes
in-stream, but something better for users is always preferable to waiting
forever for the perfect release :)

Re: 2.2.4

[Jorge Schrauwen <jo...@gmail.com>]

If its in the first week of Dec, I can do a test build on Win32 and Win64
If its mid Dec I can't due to exames.

On 11/28/06, Jim Jagielski <ji...@jagunet.com> wrote:
>
> I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
> There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
> to be approved, and others which look VERY worthwhile
> to be in this version. Let's all take some time and
> look over them ;)
>



-- 
~Jorge

Re: 2.2.4

[Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>]

On 11/28/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Actually as posted to apr - later today if nobody screams (waiting mostly
> to make sure the other projects haven't noticed any glaring flaws - we now
> answer to stdcxx, the native-internal tomcat connectors, svn etc.  APR seems
> to continue to grow in popularity.)

FWIW, you mean log4cxx not stdcxx.  =P  -- justin

Re: 2.2.4

["William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>]

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
> On Nov 28, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
> 
>> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
>>> There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
>>> to be approved, and others which look VERY worthwhile
>>> to be in this version. Let's all take some time and
>>> look over them ;)
>>
>> AFAIK, the only semi-blocking issue for me is that APR has still not
>> released a new version.......  I dunno what happened to the plans for
>> 1.2.8.
>>
> 
> IIRC, Bill is hoping to do so this week.

Actually as posted to apr - later today if nobody screams (waiting mostly
to make sure the other projects haven't noticed any glaring flaws - we now
answer to stdcxx, the native-internal tomcat connectors, svn etc.  APR seems
to continue to grow in popularity.)

Re: 2.2.4

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

On Nov 28, 2006, at 12:08 PM, Paul Querna wrote:

> Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
>> There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
>> to be approved, and others which look VERY worthwhile
>> to be in this version. Let's all take some time and
>> look over them ;)
>
> AFAIK, the only semi-blocking issue for me is that APR has still  
> not released a new version.......  I dunno what happened to the  
> plans for 1.2.8.
>

IIRC, Bill is hoping to do so this week.

Re: 2.2.4

[Paul Querna <ch...@force-elite.com>]

Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'd still like to push a 2.2.4 out, say VERY early in Dec.
> There are some backports awaiting just 1 single vote
> to be approved, and others which look VERY worthwhile
> to be in this version. Let's all take some time and
> look over them ;)

AFAIK, the only semi-blocking issue for me is that APR has still not 
released a new version.......  I dunno what happened to the plans for 1.2.8.

-Paul.