You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by "Simon Steiner (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2024/10/01 11:49:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (FOP-3209) shouldn't the change to Jakarta mean a bump to major version

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-3209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Simon Steiner resolved FOP-3209.
--------------------------------
    Resolution: Not A Problem

> shouldn't the change to Jakarta mean a bump to major version
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FOP-3209
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-3209
>             Project: FOP
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Samael Bate
>            Priority: Major
>
> I've just seen the readme ([https://github.com/apache/xmlgraphics-fop]) note that a 2.10 release will switch to Jakarta. I'm fine with a new release but wouldn't this be better done as a 3.0 as it's a breaking change.
>  
> Also, if there's a new release being done please can it either specify an _Automatic-Module-Name_ or support JPMS fully via a _module-info.java._ I did a PR for it [https://github.com/apache/xmlgraphics-fop/pull/76] last year



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)