[VOTE] Rename to in task! WAS: RE: Reserved XML tags?

[Christoph Wilhelms <Ch...@t-online.de>]

Hi!

Regarding to Conors mail I'd like to start a concrete vote for the special
case, for the decision is important for Ant 1.3 release.

Should Wolf/Glenn rename <project> to <vajproject> in the <vajload>-Task?

I think this is a simple question, wich simply can be voted ;-)!

Additional information:The project meant in this context is NO Ant-Project,
but VAJ internal projects (an abstract level above package)!

I am NO comitter, but my 0.02$ after the discussion this week: +0 (even I
have much work with it changing 10+ buildfiles ;-)).

Greetings,
Chris

Re: [VOTE] Rename to in task! WAS: RE: Reserved XML tags?

[Peter Donald <do...@apache.org>]

At 09:50  10/02/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi Christoph,
>
>Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Regarding to Conors mail I'd like to start a concrete vote for the special
>> case, for the decision is important for Ant 1.3 release.
>>
>> Should Wolf/Glenn rename <project> to <vajproject> in the <vajload>-Task?
>
>Yes, and I can do it, Wolf doesn't need to send a patch.
>
>> I think this is a simple question, wich simply can be voted ;-)!
>
>+1

+1

Re: [VOTE] Rename to in task! WAS: RE: Reserved XML tags?

[Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>]

From: "Glenn McAllister" <gl...@somanetworks.com>
> > Should Wolf/Glenn rename <project> to <vajproject> in the
<vajload>-Task?
>
> Yes, and I can do it, Wolf doesn't need to send a patch.
>

I have gone ahead and done that. Pretty trivial. Are the VAJ tasks covered
by the existing documentation. It didn't appear to be the case to me, but I
may have missed something. Do these tasks need some more documentation?

Conor

RE: [VOTE] Rename to in task! WAS: RE: Reserved XML tags?

[Conor MacNeill <co...@cortexebusiness.com.au>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: glenn@dryline-fw.wireless-sys.com
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Christoph Wilhelms wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Regarding to Conors mail I'd like to start a concrete vote for
> the special
> > case, for the decision is important for Ant 1.3 release.
> >
> > Should Wolf/Glenn rename <project> to <vajproject> in the
> <vajload>-Task?
>
> Yes, and I can do it, Wolf doesn't need to send a patch.
>
> > I think this is a simple question, wich simply can be voted ;-)!
>
> +1

+1

>  Also, the
> VAJ tasks weren't part of the 1.2 release; since they haven't been made
> public, its fair game to change them before a release.

Agreed.

>
> I don't remember the exact release schedule (sorry Conor) but
> unless I hear
> otherwise from the other committers, I'm going to make the change Monday.
> Hopefully that's enough time for anyone to get in their two
> cents.  Especially
> since Conor, Stephan, et. al. are up before I am on Monday. :-)
>

I plan on a second beta so I will wait for that. I need to do a fair bit of
work on the ejbjar documentation in any case which I want to have in the
second beta.

Re: [VOTE] Rename to in task! WAS: RE: Reserved XML tags?

[Glenn McAllister <gl...@somanetworks.com>]

Hi Christoph,

Christoph Wilhelms wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Regarding to Conors mail I'd like to start a concrete vote for the special
> case, for the decision is important for Ant 1.3 release.
>
> Should Wolf/Glenn rename <project> to <vajproject> in the <vajload>-Task?

Yes, and I can do it, Wolf doesn't need to send a patch.

> I think this is a simple question, wich simply can be voted ;-)!

+1

> I am NO comitter, but my 0.02$ after the discussion this week: +0 (even I
> have much work with it changing 10+ buildfiles ;-)).

While I *was* an ardent VAJ fan (my current place of work doesn't use it, so I
don't get at it very often anymore except at home), I have to say that VAJ
users form a realtively small part of the Ant community.  So, the impact of
this change to the community as a whole will be relatively small.  Also, the
VAJ tasks weren't part of the 1.2 release; since they haven't been made
public, its fair game to change them before a release.

I don't remember the exact release schedule (sorry Conor) but unless I hear
otherwise from the other committers, I'm going to make the change Monday.
Hopefully that's enough time for anyone to get in their two cents.  Especially
since Conor, Stephan, et. al. are up before I am on Monday. :-)

Glenn McAllister