[jira] [Updated] (DERBY-6008) Allow ORDER BY and FETCH/OFFSET in set operands

["Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dag H. Wanvik updated DERBY-6008:
---------------------------------

    Summary: Allow ORDER BY and FETCH/OFFSET in set operands  (was: Allow ORDER BY and FETCH/OFFSET in set operators)
    
> Allow ORDER BY and FETCH/OFFSET in set operands
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-6008
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6008
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Dag H. Wanvik
>
> Currently, Derby doesn't allow ORDER BY nested in a set operand, e.g. in the following construct:
> (select i from t1 order by j offset 1 row)    union 
> (select i from t2 order by j desc offset 2 rows)
> This is allowed by the standard, as far as I can understand, cf. this quote from section 7.12 in SQL 2011:
> <query expression body> ::=
>     <query term>
> |   <query expression body> UNION [ ALL | DISTINCT ]
>   [ <corresponding spec> ] <query term>
> |   <query expression body> EXCEPT [ ALL | DISTINCT ]
>   [ <corresponding spec> ] <query term>
> <query term> ::=
>    <query primary>
> |  <query term> INTERSECT [ ALL | DISTINCT ]
>    [ <corresponding spec> ] <query primary>
> <query primary> ::=
>    <simple table>
>   |  <left paren> <query expression body>
>      [ <order by clause> ] [ <result offset clause> ] [ <fetch first clause> ] <right paren>
> I.e. the left paren chooses the second alternative in the production for <query primary>.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira