You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@arrow.apache.org by Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> on 2023/01/19 19:44:43 UTC
Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
I have filed issues in the Arrow Rust repos (let me know if I missed any)
https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3569
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4994
https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista/issues/618
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/144
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> I am in favor of making the switch in arrow-rs as well -- can someone file
> an issue so to start that discussion?
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:43 AM Kevin Gurney <kg...@mathworks.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Thank you for bringing up this topic again.
> >
> > @Neal - I am already the assignee for ARROW-15693, which involves
> updating
> > crossbow. I will work on completing this as soon as possible.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Kevin Gurney
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Remzi Yang <13...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 11:32 PM
> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> >
> > Should we also do this change in arrow-rs?
> >
> > Remzi
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 11:25, Neal Richardson <
> neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Many of the subtasks on
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>
> > > have already been done. What's left is to update archery and crossbow,
> > then
> > > we can ask Infra to make the switch. Is anyone able to take those
> > subtasks
> > > on?
> > >
> > > Neal
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:58 PM Matthew Topol
> > <matt@voltrondata.com.invalid
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm in favor of it, for what it's worth.
> > > >
> > > > --Matt
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 25 2022 at 02:56:31 PM -0600, Wes McKinney
> > > > <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you think we could make a push to make this happen after the
> 9.0.0
> > > > > release goes out?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Wes
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fiona La <fionala@mathworks.com
> > > > > <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you Antoine for bringing up the engineering work that is
> > > > >> required to enable this. And thank you Neal for sharing the link
> to
> > > > >> the previous discussion and creating the umbrella issue/breaking
> > > > >> down the tasks in Jira.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am happy to work on these subtasks to move the effort forward;
> > > > >> I’ll start with this subtask [1].
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> From: Neal Richardson <neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> > > > >> <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > > >> Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38 PM
> > > > >> To: dev <dev@arrow.apache.org <ma...@arrow.apache.org>>
> > > > >> Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> > > > >> Good point Antoine, there is engineering work to be done to allow
> > > > >> this.
> > > > >> I've made an umbrella issue [1] and broke out a bunch of subtasks.
> > > > >> The idea
> > > > >> is to update our code (mostly CI stuff) to use the default branch,
> > > > >> whatever
> > > > >> it happens to be called, and then after that is done we will be
> > > > >> able to ask
> > > > >> INFRA to make the change. Those who are interested in seeing this
> > > > >> happen
> > > > >> can work on those subtasks, and we can check back once those are
> > > > >> done.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Neal
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]:
> > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>><<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Antoine Pitrou <
> antoine@python.org
> > > > >> <ma...@python.org>> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Le 14/02/2022 à 21:45, Neal Richardson a écrit :
> > > > >> > > There was discussion of this back in 2020 [1], and the
> > > > >> consensus at the
> > > > >> > > time seemed to be to wait and see where git and GitHub would
> > > > >> land before
> > > > >> > > making what could be a disruptive change. I support reopening
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > discussion.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > It looks like quite a few ASF projects have switched to 'main'
> > > > >> by now
> > > > >> > [2],
> > > > >> > > and in order to do so, we'd need a vote/consensus thread here
> > > > >> and then
> > > > >> > make
> > > > >> > > an INFRA issue (like [3]).
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > We also need someone to take responsibility for ensuring that
> all
> > > > >> CI
> > > > >> > jobs and other automation is updated for the change. Presumably
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> > could be the proponent.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Regards
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Antoine.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Neal
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > [1]:
> > > > >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
> <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>><<
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>>>
> > > > >> > > [2]:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > >
> > > > ><<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > > [3]:
> > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>><<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>>>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:25 PM Mauricio Vargas
> > > > >> <mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid <ma...@uc.cl.invalid>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> +1
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:24 PM Fiona La
> > > > >> <fionala@mathworks.com <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>> Hello all,
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> In order to be more inclusive and align with the Git<
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/<
> > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>><<
> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<
> > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>>>>
> > > > >> and GitHub<
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > >
> > > > ><<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> standards for the default branch of new repositories, I
> would
> > > > >> like to
> > > > >> > >>> propose renaming the ‘master’ branch to ‘main’ in the
> > > > >> Arrow project. I
> > > > >> > am
> > > > >> > >>> not sure if there has already been discussion about this,
> but
> > > > >> I tried
> > > > >> > >>> searching the mailing list archives and did not see anyone
> > > > >> mention this
> > > > >> > >> yet.
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> In terms of tooling, GitHub has enabled renaming branches
> > > > >> from the web
> > > > >> > >> UI<
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> <https://github.com/github/renaming<
> > https://github.com/github/renaming>><<
> > > > https://github.com/github/renaming<
> https://github.com/github/renaming
> > >>>>.
> > > > >> I’m happy to help with this
> > > > >> > change
> > > > >> > >>> in any way that I can!
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> Thank you,
> > > > >> > >>> Fiona
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> --
> > > > >> > >> —
> > > > >> > >> *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
> > > > >> > >> Site: pacha.dev
> > > > >> > >> Blog: pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog><<
> > http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog>>>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
Posted by Kevin Gurney <kg...@mathworks.com>.
Hi Joris,
This is great news! Thank you to everyone who made this possible!
It's encouraging to see steps being taken to make the Apache Arrow community more inclusive.
Best Regards,
Kevin Gurney
________________________________
From: Joris Van den Bossche <jo...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 3:06 AM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
Also for https://github.com/apache/arrow<https://github.com/apache/arrow> the default branch is now
renamed to "main".
You will see some instructions the first time visiting the github repo
since the rename, but copying them here below. You can rename the
master branch on your fork as well (visiting
https://github.com/<https://github.com><USERNAME>/arrow will prompt a message to do this).
After that, assuming your fork is called "origin" locally, the
instructions from github to update your local clone:
git branch -m master main
git fetch origin
git branch -u origin/main main
git remote set-head origin -a
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 12:59, Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion<https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion> default branch is now "main".
>
> Andy.
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 7:17 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would like to rename the default branch in arrow-datafusion next. I have
> > a PR up with the required changes:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/5280<https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/5280>
> >
> > I will submit a request to INFRA in the next few days to rename the
> > default branch if there are no objections, and I will merge this PR once
> > that has happened.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:30 PM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista<https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista> is also
> >> now "main".
> >>
> >> I will wait until we have gone through the release process in Ballista
> >> and DataFusion Python before proposing that we make these same changes in
> >> DataFusion.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 8:10 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python<https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python>
> >>> is now main.
> >>>
> >>> The process was simple for this repo - file an issue with INFRA, create
> >>> a PR to replace master with main where appropriate (docs and workflows).
> >>>
> >>> I plan on doing the same for Ballista and DataFusion over the next week
> >>> or two. I am not very active in arrow-rs, so I will leave that one for
> >>> someone else to pick up.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:11 PM Jacob Wujciak
> >>> <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks for moving this forward! In apache/arrow we have an umbrella
> >>>> issue
> >>>> [1] and I think we are at the point where we are ready to ask INFRA to
> >>>> rename the default branch to main.
> >>>> Thanks to Fiona and Kevin for their work on the hardcoded branch names
> >>>> in
> >>>> the dev tooling that was blocking this!
> >>>>
> >>>> Unless there are any objections we can initiate the switch after the
> >>>> release.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/31142<https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/31142>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 8:49 PM MAURICIO ANDRES VARGAS SEPULVEDA
> >>>> <ma...@uc.cl.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > yes, please!
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > ———
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Mauricio Vargas Sepulveda
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Master's Representative
> >>>> >
> >>>> > UofT Political Science
> >>>> >
> >>>> > ________________________________
> >>>> > From: Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
> >>>> > Sent: January 19, 2023 2:44 PM
> >>>> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
> >>>> > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I have filed issues in the Arrow Rust repos (let me know if I missed
> >>>> any)
> >>>> >
> >>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3569<https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3569>
> >>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4994<https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4994>
> >>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista/issues/618<https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista/issues/618>
> >>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/144<https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/144>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > I am in favor of making the switch in arrow-rs as well -- can
> >>>> someone
> >>>> > file
> >>>> > > an issue so to start that discussion?
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:43 AM Kevin Gurney <kgurney@mathworks.com
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > > Hi All,
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Thank you for bringing up this topic again.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > @Neal - I am already the assignee for ARROW-15693, which involves
> >>>> > > updating
> >>>> > > > crossbow. I will work on completing this as soon as possible.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Best Regards,
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Kevin Gurney
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > ________________________________
> >>>> > > > From: Remzi Yang <13...@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 11:32 PM
> >>>> > > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
> >>>> > > > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Should we also do this change in arrow-rs?
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Remzi
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 11:25, Neal Richardson <
> >>>> > > neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > > Many of the subtasks on
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689><
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>
> >>>> > > > > have already been done. What's left is to update archery and
> >>>> > crossbow,
> >>>> > > > then
> >>>> > > > > we can ask Infra to make the switch. Is anyone able to take
> >>>> those
> >>>> > > > subtasks
> >>>> > > > > on?
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > Neal
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:58 PM Matthew Topol
> >>>> > > > <matt@voltrondata.com.invalid
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > I'm in favor of it, for what it's worth.
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > --Matt
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25 2022 at 02:56:31 PM -0600, Wes McKinney
> >>>> > > > > > <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > > hi all,
> >>>> > > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > > Do you think we could make a push to make this happen after
> >>>> the
> >>>> > > 9.0.0
> >>>> > > > > > > release goes out?
> >>>> > > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > > Thanks
> >>>> > > > > > > Wes
> >>>> > > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fiona La <
> >>>> fionala@mathworks.com
> >>>> > > > > > > <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> Thank you Antoine for bringing up the engineering work
> >>>> that is
> >>>> > > > > > >> required to enable this. And thank you Neal for sharing
> >>>> the link
> >>>> > > to
> >>>> > > > > > >> the previous discussion and creating the umbrella
> >>>> issue/breaking
> >>>> > > > > > >> down the tasks in Jira.
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> I am happy to work on these subtasks to move the effort
> >>>> forward;
> >>>> > > > > > >> I’ll start with this subtask [1].
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> [1]: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692><
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692>>>
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> From: Neal Richardson <neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> >>>> > > > > > >> <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38 PM
> >>>> > > > > > >> To: dev <dev@arrow.apache.org <mailto:dev@arrow.apache.org
> >>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to
> >>>> 'main'
> >>>> > > > > > >> Good point Antoine, there is engineering work to be done to
> >>>> > allow
> >>>> > > > > > >> this.
> >>>> > > > > > >> I've made an umbrella issue [1] and broke out a bunch of
> >>>> > subtasks.
> >>>> > > > > > >> The idea
> >>>> > > > > > >> is to update our code (mostly CI stuff) to use the default
> >>>> > branch,
> >>>> > > > > > >> whatever
> >>>> > > > > > >> it happens to be called, and then after that is done we
> >>>> will be
> >>>> > > > > > >> able to ask
> >>>> > > > > > >> INFRA to make the change. Those who are interested in
> >>>> seeing
> >>>> > this
> >>>> > > > > > >> happen
> >>>> > > > > > >> can work on those subtasks, and we can check back once
> >>>> those are
> >>>> > > > > > >> done.
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> Neal
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> [1]:
> >>>> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689><
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>><<
> >>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689><
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>>>
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Antoine Pitrou <
> >>>> > > antoine@python.org
> >>>> > > > > > >> <ma...@python.org>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > Le 14/02/2022 à 21:45, Neal Richardson a écrit :
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > There was discussion of this back in 2020 [1], and the
> >>>> > > > > > >> consensus at the
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > time seemed to be to wait and see where git and GitHub
> >>>> would
> >>>> > > > > > >> land before
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > making what could be a disruptive change. I support
> >>>> > reopening
> >>>> > > > > > >> the
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > discussion.
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > It looks like quite a few ASF projects have switched to
> >>>> > 'main'
> >>>> > > > > > >> by now
> >>>> > > > > > >> > [2],
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > and in order to do so, we'd need a vote/consensus
> >>>> thread
> >>>> > here
> >>>> > > > > > >> and then
> >>>> > > > > > >> > make
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > an INFRA issue (like [3]).
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > We also need someone to take responsibility for ensuring
> >>>> that
> >>>> > > all
> >>>> > > > > > >> CI
> >>>> > > > > > >> > jobs and other automation is updated for the change.
> >>>> > Presumably
> >>>> > > > > > >> that
> >>>> > > > > > >> > could be the proponent.
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > Regards
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > Antoine.
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > Neal
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > [1]:
> >>>> > > > > > >> <
> >>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>
> >>>> > > <
> >>>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>
> >>>> >><<
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41><
> >>>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > [2]:
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> <
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC<https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC>
> >>>> > > > <
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC<https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC>
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > ><<
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC<https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC>
> >>>> > > > <
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC<https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC>
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > [3]:
> >>>> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723><
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>>><<
> >>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723><
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>>>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:25 PM Mauricio Vargas
> >>>> > > > > > >> <mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid <mailto:mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> +1
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:24 PM Fiona La
> >>>> > > > > > >> <fionala@mathworks.com <ma...@mathworks.com>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Hello all,
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> In order to be more inclusive and align with the Git<
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/<https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>
> >>>> <
> >>>> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>>><<
> >>>> > > > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname><
> >>>> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>>>>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> and GitHub<
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> <
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name<https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name>
> >>>> > > > <
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name<https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name>
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > ><<
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name<https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name>
> >>>> > > > <
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name<https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name>
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> standards for the default branch of new
> >>>> repositories, I
> >>>> > > would
> >>>> > > > > > >> like to
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> propose renaming the ‘master’ branch to ‘main’ in the
> >>>> > > > > > >> Arrow project. I
> >>>> > > > > > >> > am
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> not sure if there has already been discussion about
> >>>> this,
> >>>> > > but
> >>>> > > > > > >> I tried
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> searching the mailing list archives and did not see
> >>>> anyone
> >>>> > > > > > >> mention this
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> yet.
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> In terms of tooling, GitHub has enabled renaming
> >>>> branches
> >>>> > > > > > >> from the web
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> UI<
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> <https://github.com/github/renaming<https://github.com/github/renaming><
> >>>> > > > https://github.com/github/renaming<https://github.com/github/renaming>>><<
> >>>> > > > > > https://github.com/github/renaming<https://github.com/github/renaming><
> >>>> > > https://github.com/github/renaming<https://github.com/github/renaming>
> >>>> > > > >>>>.
> >>>> > > > > > >> I’m happy to help with this
> >>>> > > > > > >> > change
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> in any way that I can!
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Thank you,
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Fiona
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> --
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> —
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> Site: pacha.dev
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> Blog: pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog><http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog>><<
> >>>> > > > http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog><http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog>>>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>
Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
Posted by Joris Van den Bossche <jo...@gmail.com>.
Also for https://github.com/apache/arrow the default branch is now
renamed to "main".
You will see some instructions the first time visiting the github repo
since the rename, but copying them here below. You can rename the
master branch on your fork as well (visiting
https://github.com/<USERNAME>/arrow will prompt a message to do this).
After that, assuming your fork is called "origin" locally, the
instructions from github to update your local clone:
git branch -m master main
git fetch origin
git branch -u origin/main main
git remote set-head origin -a
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 at 12:59, Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion default branch is now "main".
>
> Andy.
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 7:17 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I would like to rename the default branch in arrow-datafusion next. I have
> > a PR up with the required changes:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/5280
> >
> > I will submit a request to INFRA in the next few days to rename the
> > default branch if there are no objections, and I will merge this PR once
> > that has happened.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:30 PM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista is also
> >> now "main".
> >>
> >> I will wait until we have gone through the release process in Ballista
> >> and DataFusion Python before proposing that we make these same changes in
> >> DataFusion.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 8:10 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python
> >>> is now main.
> >>>
> >>> The process was simple for this repo - file an issue with INFRA, create
> >>> a PR to replace master with main where appropriate (docs and workflows).
> >>>
> >>> I plan on doing the same for Ballista and DataFusion over the next week
> >>> or two. I am not very active in arrow-rs, so I will leave that one for
> >>> someone else to pick up.
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:11 PM Jacob Wujciak
> >>> <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks for moving this forward! In apache/arrow we have an umbrella
> >>>> issue
> >>>> [1] and I think we are at the point where we are ready to ask INFRA to
> >>>> rename the default branch to main.
> >>>> Thanks to Fiona and Kevin for their work on the hardcoded branch names
> >>>> in
> >>>> the dev tooling that was blocking this!
> >>>>
> >>>> Unless there are any objections we can initiate the switch after the
> >>>> release.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/31142
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 8:49 PM MAURICIO ANDRES VARGAS SEPULVEDA
> >>>> <ma...@uc.cl.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > yes, please!
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > ———
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Mauricio Vargas Sepulveda
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Master's Representative
> >>>> >
> >>>> > UofT Political Science
> >>>> >
> >>>> > ________________________________
> >>>> > From: Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
> >>>> > Sent: January 19, 2023 2:44 PM
> >>>> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
> >>>> > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> >>>> >
> >>>> > I have filed issues in the Arrow Rust repos (let me know if I missed
> >>>> any)
> >>>> >
> >>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3569
> >>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4994
> >>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista/issues/618
> >>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/144
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > I am in favor of making the switch in arrow-rs as well -- can
> >>>> someone
> >>>> > file
> >>>> > > an issue so to start that discussion?
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:43 AM Kevin Gurney <kgurney@mathworks.com
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > wrote:
> >>>> > >
> >>>> > > > Hi All,
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Thank you for bringing up this topic again.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > @Neal - I am already the assignee for ARROW-15693, which involves
> >>>> > > updating
> >>>> > > > crossbow. I will work on completing this as soon as possible.
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Best Regards,
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Kevin Gurney
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > ________________________________
> >>>> > > > From: Remzi Yang <13...@gmail.com>
> >>>> > > > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 11:32 PM
> >>>> > > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
> >>>> > > > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Should we also do this change in arrow-rs?
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > Remzi
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 11:25, Neal Richardson <
> >>>> > > neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > > > > Many of the subtasks on
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>
> >>>> > > > > have already been done. What's left is to update archery and
> >>>> > crossbow,
> >>>> > > > then
> >>>> > > > > we can ask Infra to make the switch. Is anyone able to take
> >>>> those
> >>>> > > > subtasks
> >>>> > > > > on?
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > Neal
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:58 PM Matthew Topol
> >>>> > > > <matt@voltrondata.com.invalid
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > I'm in favor of it, for what it's worth.
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > --Matt
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25 2022 at 02:56:31 PM -0600, Wes McKinney
> >>>> > > > > > <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > > hi all,
> >>>> > > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > > Do you think we could make a push to make this happen after
> >>>> the
> >>>> > > 9.0.0
> >>>> > > > > > > release goes out?
> >>>> > > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > > Thanks
> >>>> > > > > > > Wes
> >>>> > > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fiona La <
> >>>> fionala@mathworks.com
> >>>> > > > > > > <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> Thank you Antoine for bringing up the engineering work
> >>>> that is
> >>>> > > > > > >> required to enable this. And thank you Neal for sharing
> >>>> the link
> >>>> > > to
> >>>> > > > > > >> the previous discussion and creating the umbrella
> >>>> issue/breaking
> >>>> > > > > > >> down the tasks in Jira.
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> I am happy to work on these subtasks to move the effort
> >>>> forward;
> >>>> > > > > > >> I’ll start with this subtask [1].
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> [1]: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692<
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692>>
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> From: Neal Richardson <neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> >>>> > > > > > >> <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38 PM
> >>>> > > > > > >> To: dev <dev@arrow.apache.org <mailto:dev@arrow.apache.org
> >>>> >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to
> >>>> 'main'
> >>>> > > > > > >> Good point Antoine, there is engineering work to be done to
> >>>> > allow
> >>>> > > > > > >> this.
> >>>> > > > > > >> I've made an umbrella issue [1] and broke out a bunch of
> >>>> > subtasks.
> >>>> > > > > > >> The idea
> >>>> > > > > > >> is to update our code (mostly CI stuff) to use the default
> >>>> > branch,
> >>>> > > > > > >> whatever
> >>>> > > > > > >> it happens to be called, and then after that is done we
> >>>> will be
> >>>> > > > > > >> able to ask
> >>>> > > > > > >> INFRA to make the change. Those who are interested in
> >>>> seeing
> >>>> > this
> >>>> > > > > > >> happen
> >>>> > > > > > >> can work on those subtasks, and we can check back once
> >>>> those are
> >>>> > > > > > >> done.
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> Neal
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> [1]:
> >>>> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>><<
> >>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>>
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Antoine Pitrou <
> >>>> > > antoine@python.org
> >>>> > > > > > >> <ma...@python.org>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > Le 14/02/2022 à 21:45, Neal Richardson a écrit :
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > There was discussion of this back in 2020 [1], and the
> >>>> > > > > > >> consensus at the
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > time seemed to be to wait and see where git and GitHub
> >>>> would
> >>>> > > > > > >> land before
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > making what could be a disruptive change. I support
> >>>> > reopening
> >>>> > > > > > >> the
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > discussion.
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > It looks like quite a few ASF projects have switched to
> >>>> > 'main'
> >>>> > > > > > >> by now
> >>>> > > > > > >> > [2],
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > and in order to do so, we'd need a vote/consensus
> >>>> thread
> >>>> > here
> >>>> > > > > > >> and then
> >>>> > > > > > >> > make
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > an INFRA issue (like [3]).
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > We also need someone to take responsibility for ensuring
> >>>> that
> >>>> > > all
> >>>> > > > > > >> CI
> >>>> > > > > > >> > jobs and other automation is updated for the change.
> >>>> > Presumably
> >>>> > > > > > >> that
> >>>> > > > > > >> > could be the proponent.
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > Regards
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > Antoine.
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > Neal
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > [1]:
> >>>> > > > > > >> <
> >>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
> >>>> > > <
> >>>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
> >>>> >><<
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<
> >>>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > [2]:
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> <
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >>>> > > > <
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > ><<
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >>>> > > > <
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > [3]:
> >>>> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>><<
> >>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
> >>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:25 PM Mauricio Vargas
> >>>> > > > > > >> <mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid <mailto:mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid
> >>>> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> +1
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:24 PM Fiona La
> >>>> > > > > > >> <fionala@mathworks.com <ma...@mathworks.com>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Hello all,
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> In order to be more inclusive and align with the Git<
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/
> >>>> <
> >>>> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>><<
> >>>> > > > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<
> >>>> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>>>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> and GitHub<
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > > >> <
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> >>>> > > > <
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > ><<
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> >>>> > > > <
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > > > > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> standards for the default branch of new
> >>>> repositories, I
> >>>> > > would
> >>>> > > > > > >> like to
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> propose renaming the ‘master’ branch to ‘main’ in the
> >>>> > > > > > >> Arrow project. I
> >>>> > > > > > >> > am
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> not sure if there has already been discussion about
> >>>> this,
> >>>> > > but
> >>>> > > > > > >> I tried
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> searching the mailing list archives and did not see
> >>>> anyone
> >>>> > > > > > >> mention this
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> yet.
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> In terms of tooling, GitHub has enabled renaming
> >>>> branches
> >>>> > > > > > >> from the web
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> UI<
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> <https://github.com/github/renaming<
> >>>> > > > https://github.com/github/renaming>><<
> >>>> > > > > > https://github.com/github/renaming<
> >>>> > > https://github.com/github/renaming
> >>>> > > > >>>>.
> >>>> > > > > > >> I’m happy to help with this
> >>>> > > > > > >> > change
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> in any way that I can!
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Thank you,
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Fiona
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> --
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> —
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> Site: pacha.dev
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >> Blog: pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog><<
> >>>> > > > http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog>>>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >>
> >>>> > > > > > >> > >
> >>>> > > > > > >> >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > > >
> >>>> > > > >
> >>>> > > >
> >>>> > >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>
Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
Posted by Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>.
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion default branch is now "main".
Andy.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 7:17 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would like to rename the default branch in arrow-datafusion next. I have
> a PR up with the required changes:
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/5280
>
> I will submit a request to INFRA in the next few days to rename the
> default branch if there are no objections, and I will merge this PR once
> that has happened.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:30 PM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista is also
>> now "main".
>>
>> I will wait until we have gone through the release process in Ballista
>> and DataFusion Python before proposing that we make these same changes in
>> DataFusion.
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 8:10 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python
>>> is now main.
>>>
>>> The process was simple for this repo - file an issue with INFRA, create
>>> a PR to replace master with main where appropriate (docs and workflows).
>>>
>>> I plan on doing the same for Ballista and DataFusion over the next week
>>> or two. I am not very active in arrow-rs, so I will leave that one for
>>> someone else to pick up.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:11 PM Jacob Wujciak
>>> <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for moving this forward! In apache/arrow we have an umbrella
>>>> issue
>>>> [1] and I think we are at the point where we are ready to ask INFRA to
>>>> rename the default branch to main.
>>>> Thanks to Fiona and Kevin for their work on the hardcoded branch names
>>>> in
>>>> the dev tooling that was blocking this!
>>>>
>>>> Unless there are any objections we can initiate the switch after the
>>>> release.
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/31142
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 8:49 PM MAURICIO ANDRES VARGAS SEPULVEDA
>>>> <ma...@uc.cl.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > yes, please!
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > ———
>>>> >
>>>> > Mauricio Vargas Sepulveda
>>>> >
>>>> > Master's Representative
>>>> >
>>>> > UofT Political Science
>>>> >
>>>> > ________________________________
>>>> > From: Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
>>>> > Sent: January 19, 2023 2:44 PM
>>>> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
>>>> > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
>>>> >
>>>> > I have filed issues in the Arrow Rust repos (let me know if I missed
>>>> any)
>>>> >
>>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3569
>>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4994
>>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista/issues/618
>>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/144
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > I am in favor of making the switch in arrow-rs as well -- can
>>>> someone
>>>> > file
>>>> > > an issue so to start that discussion?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:43 AM Kevin Gurney <kgurney@mathworks.com
>>>> >
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > > Hi All,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Thank you for bringing up this topic again.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > @Neal - I am already the assignee for ARROW-15693, which involves
>>>> > > updating
>>>> > > > crossbow. I will work on completing this as soon as possible.
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Best Regards,
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Kevin Gurney
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > ________________________________
>>>> > > > From: Remzi Yang <13...@gmail.com>
>>>> > > > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 11:32 PM
>>>> > > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
>>>> > > > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Should we also do this change in arrow-rs?
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > Remzi
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 11:25, Neal Richardson <
>>>> > > neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > wrote:
>>>> > > >
>>>> > > > > Many of the subtasks on
>>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
>>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>
>>>> > > > > have already been done. What's left is to update archery and
>>>> > crossbow,
>>>> > > > then
>>>> > > > > we can ask Infra to make the switch. Is anyone able to take
>>>> those
>>>> > > > subtasks
>>>> > > > > on?
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > Neal
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:58 PM Matthew Topol
>>>> > > > <matt@voltrondata.com.invalid
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > wrote:
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > I'm in favor of it, for what it's worth.
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > --Matt
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25 2022 at 02:56:31 PM -0600, Wes McKinney
>>>> > > > > > <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > > hi all,
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > Do you think we could make a push to make this happen after
>>>> the
>>>> > > 9.0.0
>>>> > > > > > > release goes out?
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > Thanks
>>>> > > > > > > Wes
>>>> > > > > > >
>>>> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fiona La <
>>>> fionala@mathworks.com
>>>> > > > > > > <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> Thank you Antoine for bringing up the engineering work
>>>> that is
>>>> > > > > > >> required to enable this. And thank you Neal for sharing
>>>> the link
>>>> > > to
>>>> > > > > > >> the previous discussion and creating the umbrella
>>>> issue/breaking
>>>> > > > > > >> down the tasks in Jira.
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> I am happy to work on these subtasks to move the effort
>>>> forward;
>>>> > > > > > >> I’ll start with this subtask [1].
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> [1]: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692<
>>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692>>
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> From: Neal Richardson <neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
>>>> > > > > > >> <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>> > > > > > >> Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38 PM
>>>> > > > > > >> To: dev <dev@arrow.apache.org <mailto:dev@arrow.apache.org
>>>> >>
>>>> > > > > > >> Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to
>>>> 'main'
>>>> > > > > > >> Good point Antoine, there is engineering work to be done to
>>>> > allow
>>>> > > > > > >> this.
>>>> > > > > > >> I've made an umbrella issue [1] and broke out a bunch of
>>>> > subtasks.
>>>> > > > > > >> The idea
>>>> > > > > > >> is to update our code (mostly CI stuff) to use the default
>>>> > branch,
>>>> > > > > > >> whatever
>>>> > > > > > >> it happens to be called, and then after that is done we
>>>> will be
>>>> > > > > > >> able to ask
>>>> > > > > > >> INFRA to make the change. Those who are interested in
>>>> seeing
>>>> > this
>>>> > > > > > >> happen
>>>> > > > > > >> can work on those subtasks, and we can check back once
>>>> those are
>>>> > > > > > >> done.
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> Neal
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> [1]:
>>>> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
>>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>><<
>>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
>>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>>
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Antoine Pitrou <
>>>> > > antoine@python.org
>>>> > > > > > >> <ma...@python.org>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >> > Le 14/02/2022 à 21:45, Neal Richardson a écrit :
>>>> > > > > > >> > > There was discussion of this back in 2020 [1], and the
>>>> > > > > > >> consensus at the
>>>> > > > > > >> > > time seemed to be to wait and see where git and GitHub
>>>> would
>>>> > > > > > >> land before
>>>> > > > > > >> > > making what could be a disruptive change. I support
>>>> > reopening
>>>> > > > > > >> the
>>>> > > > > > >> > > discussion.
>>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >> > > It looks like quite a few ASF projects have switched to
>>>> > 'main'
>>>> > > > > > >> by now
>>>> > > > > > >> > [2],
>>>> > > > > > >> > > and in order to do so, we'd need a vote/consensus
>>>> thread
>>>> > here
>>>> > > > > > >> and then
>>>> > > > > > >> > make
>>>> > > > > > >> > > an INFRA issue (like [3]).
>>>> > > > > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >> > We also need someone to take responsibility for ensuring
>>>> that
>>>> > > all
>>>> > > > > > >> CI
>>>> > > > > > >> > jobs and other automation is updated for the change.
>>>> > Presumably
>>>> > > > > > >> that
>>>> > > > > > >> > could be the proponent.
>>>> > > > > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >> > Regards
>>>> > > > > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >> > Antoine.
>>>> > > > > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >> > > Neal
>>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >> > > [1]:
>>>> > > > > > >> <
>>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
>>>> > > <
>>>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
>>>> >><<
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<
>>>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
>>>> >>>
>>>> > > > > > >> > > [2]:
>>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >> <
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>> > > > <
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > ><<
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>> > > > <
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> > > [3]:
>>>> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
>>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>><<
>>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
>>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>>>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:25 PM Mauricio Vargas
>>>> > > > > > >> <mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid <mailto:mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid
>>>> >
>>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >> > >> +1
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:24 PM Fiona La
>>>> > > > > > >> <fionala@mathworks.com <ma...@mathworks.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Hello all,
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>> In order to be more inclusive and align with the Git<
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/
>>>> <
>>>> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>><<
>>>> > > > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<
>>>> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>>>>
>>>> > > > > > >> and GitHub<
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> >
>>>> > > > > > >> <
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>>>> > > > <
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > ><<
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>>>> > > > <
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > > > > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>> standards for the default branch of new
>>>> repositories, I
>>>> > > would
>>>> > > > > > >> like to
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>> propose renaming the ‘master’ branch to ‘main’ in the
>>>> > > > > > >> Arrow project. I
>>>> > > > > > >> > am
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>> not sure if there has already been discussion about
>>>> this,
>>>> > > but
>>>> > > > > > >> I tried
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>> searching the mailing list archives and did not see
>>>> anyone
>>>> > > > > > >> mention this
>>>> > > > > > >> > >> yet.
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>> In terms of tooling, GitHub has enabled renaming
>>>> branches
>>>> > > > > > >> from the web
>>>> > > > > > >> > >> UI<
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >> <https://github.com/github/renaming<
>>>> > > > https://github.com/github/renaming>><<
>>>> > > > > > https://github.com/github/renaming<
>>>> > > https://github.com/github/renaming
>>>> > > > >>>>.
>>>> > > > > > >> I’m happy to help with this
>>>> > > > > > >> > change
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>> in any way that I can!
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Thank you,
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Fiona
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >> --
>>>> > > > > > >> > >> —
>>>> > > > > > >> > >> *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
>>>> > > > > > >> > >> Site: pacha.dev
>>>> > > > > > >> > >> Blog: pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog><<
>>>> > > > http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog>>>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>>> > > > > > >> >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > > >
>>>> > > > >
>>>> > > >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
Posted by Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>.
I would like to rename the default branch in arrow-datafusion next. I have
a PR up with the required changes:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/5280
I will submit a request to INFRA in the next few days to rename the default
branch if there are no objections, and I will merge this PR once that has
happened.
Thanks,
Andy.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 12:30 PM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista is also
> now "main".
>
> I will wait until we have gone through the release process in Ballista and
> DataFusion Python before proposing that we make these same changes in
> DataFusion.
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 8:10 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python
>> is now main.
>>
>> The process was simple for this repo - file an issue with INFRA, create a
>> PR to replace master with main where appropriate (docs and workflows).
>>
>> I plan on doing the same for Ballista and DataFusion over the next week
>> or two. I am not very active in arrow-rs, so I will leave that one for
>> someone else to pick up.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:11 PM Jacob Wujciak
>> <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for moving this forward! In apache/arrow we have an umbrella issue
>>> [1] and I think we are at the point where we are ready to ask INFRA to
>>> rename the default branch to main.
>>> Thanks to Fiona and Kevin for their work on the hardcoded branch names in
>>> the dev tooling that was blocking this!
>>>
>>> Unless there are any objections we can initiate the switch after the
>>> release.
>>>
>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/31142
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 8:49 PM MAURICIO ANDRES VARGAS SEPULVEDA
>>> <ma...@uc.cl.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> > yes, please!
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > ———
>>> >
>>> > Mauricio Vargas Sepulveda
>>> >
>>> > Master's Representative
>>> >
>>> > UofT Political Science
>>> >
>>> > ________________________________
>>> > From: Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
>>> > Sent: January 19, 2023 2:44 PM
>>> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
>>> > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
>>> >
>>> > I have filed issues in the Arrow Rust repos (let me know if I missed
>>> any)
>>> >
>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3569
>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4994
>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista/issues/618
>>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/144
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I am in favor of making the switch in arrow-rs as well -- can someone
>>> > file
>>> > > an issue so to start that discussion?
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:43 AM Kevin Gurney <kg...@mathworks.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi All,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thank you for bringing up this topic again.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > @Neal - I am already the assignee for ARROW-15693, which involves
>>> > > updating
>>> > > > crossbow. I will work on completing this as soon as possible.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Best Regards,
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Kevin Gurney
>>> > > >
>>> > > > ________________________________
>>> > > > From: Remzi Yang <13...@gmail.com>
>>> > > > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 11:32 PM
>>> > > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
>>> > > > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Should we also do this change in arrow-rs?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Remzi
>>> > > >
>>> > > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 11:25, Neal Richardson <
>>> > > neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > wrote:
>>> > > >
>>> > > > > Many of the subtasks on
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>
>>> > > > > have already been done. What's left is to update archery and
>>> > crossbow,
>>> > > > then
>>> > > > > we can ask Infra to make the switch. Is anyone able to take those
>>> > > > subtasks
>>> > > > > on?
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > Neal
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:58 PM Matthew Topol
>>> > > > <matt@voltrondata.com.invalid
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > wrote:
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > I'm in favor of it, for what it's worth.
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > --Matt
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25 2022 at 02:56:31 PM -0600, Wes McKinney
>>> > > > > > <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > > > > > > hi all,
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Do you think we could make a push to make this happen after
>>> the
>>> > > 9.0.0
>>> > > > > > > release goes out?
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > Thanks
>>> > > > > > > Wes
>>> > > > > > >
>>> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fiona La <
>>> fionala@mathworks.com
>>> > > > > > > <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> Thank you Antoine for bringing up the engineering work that
>>> is
>>> > > > > > >> required to enable this. And thank you Neal for sharing the
>>> link
>>> > > to
>>> > > > > > >> the previous discussion and creating the umbrella
>>> issue/breaking
>>> > > > > > >> down the tasks in Jira.
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> I am happy to work on these subtasks to move the effort
>>> forward;
>>> > > > > > >> I’ll start with this subtask [1].
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> [1]: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692<
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692>>
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> From: Neal Richardson <neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
>>> > > > > > >> <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>> > > > > > >> Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38 PM
>>> > > > > > >> To: dev <dev@arrow.apache.org <mailto:dev@arrow.apache.org
>>> >>
>>> > > > > > >> Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to
>>> 'main'
>>> > > > > > >> Good point Antoine, there is engineering work to be done to
>>> > allow
>>> > > > > > >> this.
>>> > > > > > >> I've made an umbrella issue [1] and broke out a bunch of
>>> > subtasks.
>>> > > > > > >> The idea
>>> > > > > > >> is to update our code (mostly CI stuff) to use the default
>>> > branch,
>>> > > > > > >> whatever
>>> > > > > > >> it happens to be called, and then after that is done we
>>> will be
>>> > > > > > >> able to ask
>>> > > > > > >> INFRA to make the change. Those who are interested in seeing
>>> > this
>>> > > > > > >> happen
>>> > > > > > >> can work on those subtasks, and we can check back once
>>> those are
>>> > > > > > >> done.
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> Neal
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> [1]:
>>> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>><<
>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>>
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Antoine Pitrou <
>>> > > antoine@python.org
>>> > > > > > >> <ma...@python.org>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> > Le 14/02/2022 à 21:45, Neal Richardson a écrit :
>>> > > > > > >> > > There was discussion of this back in 2020 [1], and the
>>> > > > > > >> consensus at the
>>> > > > > > >> > > time seemed to be to wait and see where git and GitHub
>>> would
>>> > > > > > >> land before
>>> > > > > > >> > > making what could be a disruptive change. I support
>>> > reopening
>>> > > > > > >> the
>>> > > > > > >> > > discussion.
>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >> > > It looks like quite a few ASF projects have switched to
>>> > 'main'
>>> > > > > > >> by now
>>> > > > > > >> > [2],
>>> > > > > > >> > > and in order to do so, we'd need a vote/consensus thread
>>> > here
>>> > > > > > >> and then
>>> > > > > > >> > make
>>> > > > > > >> > > an INFRA issue (like [3]).
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> > We also need someone to take responsibility for ensuring
>>> that
>>> > > all
>>> > > > > > >> CI
>>> > > > > > >> > jobs and other automation is updated for the change.
>>> > Presumably
>>> > > > > > >> that
>>> > > > > > >> > could be the proponent.
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> > Regards
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> > Antoine.
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >> > > Neal
>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >> > > [1]:
>>> > > > > > >> <
>>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
>>> > > <
>>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
>>> >><<
>>> > > > > >
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<
>>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
>>> >>>
>>> > > > > > >> > > [2]:
>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> <
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>> > > > <
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > ><<
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>> > > > <
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> > > [3]:
>>> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>><<
>>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
>>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>>>
>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:25 PM Mauricio Vargas
>>> > > > > > >> <mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid <ma...@uc.cl.invalid>
>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >> > >> +1
>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:24 PM Fiona La
>>> > > > > > >> <fionala@mathworks.com <ma...@mathworks.com>>
>>> wrote:
>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Hello all,
>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > > > > > >> > >>> In order to be more inclusive and align with the Git<
>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > > > > > >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/<
>>> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>><<
>>> > > > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<
>>> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>>>>
>>> > > > > > >> and GitHub<
>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > > >> <
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>>> > > > <
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > ><<
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>>> > > > <
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>>> > > > >
>>> > > > > > >>
>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > > > > > >> > >>> standards for the default branch of new repositories,
>>> I
>>> > > would
>>> > > > > > >> like to
>>> > > > > > >> > >>> propose renaming the ‘master’ branch to ‘main’ in the
>>> > > > > > >> Arrow project. I
>>> > > > > > >> > am
>>> > > > > > >> > >>> not sure if there has already been discussion about
>>> this,
>>> > > but
>>> > > > > > >> I tried
>>> > > > > > >> > >>> searching the mailing list archives and did not see
>>> anyone
>>> > > > > > >> mention this
>>> > > > > > >> > >> yet.
>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > > > > > >> > >>> In terms of tooling, GitHub has enabled renaming
>>> branches
>>> > > > > > >> from the web
>>> > > > > > >> > >> UI<
>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > > > > > >> <https://github.com/github/renaming<
>>> > > > https://github.com/github/renaming>><<
>>> > > > > > https://github.com/github/renaming<
>>> > > https://github.com/github/renaming
>>> > > > >>>>.
>>> > > > > > >> I’m happy to help with this
>>> > > > > > >> > change
>>> > > > > > >> > >>> in any way that I can!
>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Thank you,
>>> > > > > > >> > >>> Fiona
>>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > > > > > >> > >> --
>>> > > > > > >> > >> —
>>> > > > > > >> > >> *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
>>> > > > > > >> > >> Site: pacha.dev
>>> > > > > > >> > >> Blog: pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog><<
>>> > > > http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog>>>
>>> > > > > > >> > >>
>>> > > > > > >> > >
>>> > > > > > >> >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > > >
>>> > > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
Posted by Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>.
The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista is also now
"main".
I will wait until we have gone through the release process in Ballista and
DataFusion Python before proposing that we make these same changes in
DataFusion.
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 8:10 AM Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python
> is now main.
>
> The process was simple for this repo - file an issue with INFRA, create a
> PR to replace master with main where appropriate (docs and workflows).
>
> I plan on doing the same for Ballista and DataFusion over the next week or
> two. I am not very active in arrow-rs, so I will leave that one for someone
> else to pick up.
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:11 PM Jacob Wujciak
> <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for moving this forward! In apache/arrow we have an umbrella issue
>> [1] and I think we are at the point where we are ready to ask INFRA to
>> rename the default branch to main.
>> Thanks to Fiona and Kevin for their work on the hardcoded branch names in
>> the dev tooling that was blocking this!
>>
>> Unless there are any objections we can initiate the switch after the
>> release.
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/31142
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 8:49 PM MAURICIO ANDRES VARGAS SEPULVEDA
>> <ma...@uc.cl.invalid> wrote:
>>
>> > yes, please!
>> >
>> >
>> > ———
>> >
>> > Mauricio Vargas Sepulveda
>> >
>> > Master's Representative
>> >
>> > UofT Political Science
>> >
>> > ________________________________
>> > From: Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
>> > Sent: January 19, 2023 2:44 PM
>> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
>> > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
>> >
>> > I have filed issues in the Arrow Rust repos (let me know if I missed
>> any)
>> >
>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3569
>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4994
>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista/issues/618
>> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/144
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I am in favor of making the switch in arrow-rs as well -- can someone
>> > file
>> > > an issue so to start that discussion?
>> > >
>> > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:43 AM Kevin Gurney <kg...@mathworks.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi All,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you for bringing up this topic again.
>> > > >
>> > > > @Neal - I am already the assignee for ARROW-15693, which involves
>> > > updating
>> > > > crossbow. I will work on completing this as soon as possible.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best Regards,
>> > > >
>> > > > Kevin Gurney
>> > > >
>> > > > ________________________________
>> > > > From: Remzi Yang <13...@gmail.com>
>> > > > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 11:32 PM
>> > > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
>> > > > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
>> > > >
>> > > > Should we also do this change in arrow-rs?
>> > > >
>> > > > Remzi
>> > > >
>> > > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 11:25, Neal Richardson <
>> > > neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
>> > > > >
>> > > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Many of the subtasks on
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>
>> > > > > have already been done. What's left is to update archery and
>> > crossbow,
>> > > > then
>> > > > > we can ask Infra to make the switch. Is anyone able to take those
>> > > > subtasks
>> > > > > on?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Neal
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:58 PM Matthew Topol
>> > > > <matt@voltrondata.com.invalid
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > I'm in favor of it, for what it's worth.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > --Matt
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25 2022 at 02:56:31 PM -0600, Wes McKinney
>> > > > > > <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > hi all,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Do you think we could make a push to make this happen after
>> the
>> > > 9.0.0
>> > > > > > > release goes out?
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks
>> > > > > > > Wes
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fiona La <
>> fionala@mathworks.com
>> > > > > > > <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Thank you Antoine for bringing up the engineering work that
>> is
>> > > > > > >> required to enable this. And thank you Neal for sharing the
>> link
>> > > to
>> > > > > > >> the previous discussion and creating the umbrella
>> issue/breaking
>> > > > > > >> down the tasks in Jira.
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> I am happy to work on these subtasks to move the effort
>> forward;
>> > > > > > >> I’ll start with this subtask [1].
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> [1]: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692<
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692>>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> From: Neal Richardson <neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
>> > > > > > >> <ma...@gmail.com>>
>> > > > > > >> Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38 PM
>> > > > > > >> To: dev <dev@arrow.apache.org <ma...@arrow.apache.org>>
>> > > > > > >> Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
>> > > > > > >> Good point Antoine, there is engineering work to be done to
>> > allow
>> > > > > > >> this.
>> > > > > > >> I've made an umbrella issue [1] and broke out a bunch of
>> > subtasks.
>> > > > > > >> The idea
>> > > > > > >> is to update our code (mostly CI stuff) to use the default
>> > branch,
>> > > > > > >> whatever
>> > > > > > >> it happens to be called, and then after that is done we will
>> be
>> > > > > > >> able to ask
>> > > > > > >> INFRA to make the change. Those who are interested in seeing
>> > this
>> > > > > > >> happen
>> > > > > > >> can work on those subtasks, and we can check back once those
>> are
>> > > > > > >> done.
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> Neal
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> [1]:
>> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>><<
>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>>
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Antoine Pitrou <
>> > > antoine@python.org
>> > > > > > >> <ma...@python.org>> wrote:
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> > Le 14/02/2022 à 21:45, Neal Richardson a écrit :
>> > > > > > >> > > There was discussion of this back in 2020 [1], and the
>> > > > > > >> consensus at the
>> > > > > > >> > > time seemed to be to wait and see where git and GitHub
>> would
>> > > > > > >> land before
>> > > > > > >> > > making what could be a disruptive change. I support
>> > reopening
>> > > > > > >> the
>> > > > > > >> > > discussion.
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > It looks like quite a few ASF projects have switched to
>> > 'main'
>> > > > > > >> by now
>> > > > > > >> > [2],
>> > > > > > >> > > and in order to do so, we'd need a vote/consensus thread
>> > here
>> > > > > > >> and then
>> > > > > > >> > make
>> > > > > > >> > > an INFRA issue (like [3]).
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> > We also need someone to take responsibility for ensuring
>> that
>> > > all
>> > > > > > >> CI
>> > > > > > >> > jobs and other automation is updated for the change.
>> > Presumably
>> > > > > > >> that
>> > > > > > >> > could be the proponent.
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> > Regards
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> > Antoine.
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > Neal
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > [1]:
>> > > > > > >> <
>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
>> > > <
>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
>> >><<
>> > > > > >
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<
>> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>>>
>> > > > > > >> > > [2]:
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> <
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>> > > > <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > ><<
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>> > > > <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> > > [3]:
>> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>><<
>> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
>> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>>>
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:25 PM Mauricio Vargas
>> > > > > > >> <mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid <ma...@uc.cl.invalid>
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> > >> +1
>> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:24 PM Fiona La
>> > > > > > >> <fionala@mathworks.com <ma...@mathworks.com>>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > > >> > >>> Hello all,
>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > >>> In order to be more inclusive and align with the Git<
>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/<
>> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>><<
>> > > > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<
>> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>>>>
>> > > > > > >> and GitHub<
>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > > >> <
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>> > > > <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > ><<
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>> > > > <
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > >>
>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > >>> standards for the default branch of new repositories, I
>> > > would
>> > > > > > >> like to
>> > > > > > >> > >>> propose renaming the ‘master’ branch to ‘main’ in the
>> > > > > > >> Arrow project. I
>> > > > > > >> > am
>> > > > > > >> > >>> not sure if there has already been discussion about
>> this,
>> > > but
>> > > > > > >> I tried
>> > > > > > >> > >>> searching the mailing list archives and did not see
>> anyone
>> > > > > > >> mention this
>> > > > > > >> > >> yet.
>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > >>> In terms of tooling, GitHub has enabled renaming
>> branches
>> > > > > > >> from the web
>> > > > > > >> > >> UI<
>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > >> <https://github.com/github/renaming<
>> > > > https://github.com/github/renaming>><<
>> > > > > > https://github.com/github/renaming<
>> > > https://github.com/github/renaming
>> > > > >>>>.
>> > > > > > >> I’m happy to help with this
>> > > > > > >> > change
>> > > > > > >> > >>> in any way that I can!
>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > >>> Thank you,
>> > > > > > >> > >>> Fiona
>> > > > > > >> > >>>
>> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > > >> > >> --
>> > > > > > >> > >> —
>> > > > > > >> > >> *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
>> > > > > > >> > >> Site: pacha.dev
>> > > > > > >> > >> Blog: pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog><<
>> > > > http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog>>>
>> > > > > > >> > >>
>> > > > > > >> > >
>> > > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
Posted by Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>.
The default branch in https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python is
now main.
The process was simple for this repo - file an issue with INFRA, create a
PR to replace master with main where appropriate (docs and workflows).
I plan on doing the same for Ballista and DataFusion over the next week or
two. I am not very active in arrow-rs, so I will leave that one for someone
else to pick up.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 3:11 PM Jacob Wujciak <ja...@voltrondata.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Thanks for moving this forward! In apache/arrow we have an umbrella issue
> [1] and I think we are at the point where we are ready to ask INFRA to
> rename the default branch to main.
> Thanks to Fiona and Kevin for their work on the hardcoded branch names in
> the dev tooling that was blocking this!
>
> Unless there are any objections we can initiate the switch after the
> release.
>
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/31142
>
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 8:49 PM MAURICIO ANDRES VARGAS SEPULVEDA
> <ma...@uc.cl.invalid> wrote:
>
> > yes, please!
> >
> >
> > ———
> >
> > Mauricio Vargas Sepulveda
> >
> > Master's Representative
> >
> > UofT Political Science
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: January 19, 2023 2:44 PM
> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> >
> > I have filed issues in the Arrow Rust repos (let me know if I missed any)
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3569
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4994
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista/issues/618
> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/144
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I am in favor of making the switch in arrow-rs as well -- can someone
> > file
> > > an issue so to start that discussion?
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:43 AM Kevin Gurney <kg...@mathworks.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for bringing up this topic again.
> > > >
> > > > @Neal - I am already the assignee for ARROW-15693, which involves
> > > updating
> > > > crossbow. I will work on completing this as soon as possible.
> > > >
> > > > Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Kevin Gurney
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: Remzi Yang <13...@gmail.com>
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 11:32 PM
> > > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
> > > > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> > > >
> > > > Should we also do this change in arrow-rs?
> > > >
> > > > Remzi
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 11:25, Neal Richardson <
> > > neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Many of the subtasks on
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>
> > > > > have already been done. What's left is to update archery and
> > crossbow,
> > > > then
> > > > > we can ask Infra to make the switch. Is anyone able to take those
> > > > subtasks
> > > > > on?
> > > > >
> > > > > Neal
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:58 PM Matthew Topol
> > > > <matt@voltrondata.com.invalid
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > I'm in favor of it, for what it's worth.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --Matt
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jul 25 2022 at 02:56:31 PM -0600, Wes McKinney
> > > > > > <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Do you think we could make a push to make this happen after the
> > > 9.0.0
> > > > > > > release goes out?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > Wes
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fiona La <
> fionala@mathworks.com
> > > > > > > <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thank you Antoine for bringing up the engineering work that is
> > > > > > >> required to enable this. And thank you Neal for sharing the
> link
> > > to
> > > > > > >> the previous discussion and creating the umbrella
> issue/breaking
> > > > > > >> down the tasks in Jira.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> I am happy to work on these subtasks to move the effort
> forward;
> > > > > > >> I’ll start with this subtask [1].
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [1]: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> From: Neal Richardson <neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> > > > > > >> <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > > >> Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38 PM
> > > > > > >> To: dev <dev@arrow.apache.org <ma...@arrow.apache.org>>
> > > > > > >> Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> > > > > > >> Good point Antoine, there is engineering work to be done to
> > allow
> > > > > > >> this.
> > > > > > >> I've made an umbrella issue [1] and broke out a bunch of
> > subtasks.
> > > > > > >> The idea
> > > > > > >> is to update our code (mostly CI stuff) to use the default
> > branch,
> > > > > > >> whatever
> > > > > > >> it happens to be called, and then after that is done we will
> be
> > > > > > >> able to ask
> > > > > > >> INFRA to make the change. Those who are interested in seeing
> > this
> > > > > > >> happen
> > > > > > >> can work on those subtasks, and we can check back once those
> are
> > > > > > >> done.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Neal
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> [1]:
> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>><<
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Antoine Pitrou <
> > > antoine@python.org
> > > > > > >> <ma...@python.org>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Le 14/02/2022 à 21:45, Neal Richardson a écrit :
> > > > > > >> > > There was discussion of this back in 2020 [1], and the
> > > > > > >> consensus at the
> > > > > > >> > > time seemed to be to wait and see where git and GitHub
> would
> > > > > > >> land before
> > > > > > >> > > making what could be a disruptive change. I support
> > reopening
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> > > discussion.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > It looks like quite a few ASF projects have switched to
> > 'main'
> > > > > > >> by now
> > > > > > >> > [2],
> > > > > > >> > > and in order to do so, we'd need a vote/consensus thread
> > here
> > > > > > >> and then
> > > > > > >> > make
> > > > > > >> > > an INFRA issue (like [3]).
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > We also need someone to take responsibility for ensuring
> that
> > > all
> > > > > > >> CI
> > > > > > >> > jobs and other automation is updated for the change.
> > Presumably
> > > > > > >> that
> > > > > > >> > could be the proponent.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Regards
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Antoine.
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > Neal
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > [1]:
> > > > > > >> <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
> > > <
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>><<
> > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
> <
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>>>
> > > > > > >> > > [2]:
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > > > >
> > > > > > ><<
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > > > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > > [3]:
> > > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>><<
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>>>
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:25 PM Mauricio Vargas
> > > > > > >> <mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid <ma...@uc.cl.invalid>
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >> +1
> > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:24 PM Fiona La
> > > > > > >> <fionala@mathworks.com <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > >> > >>> Hello all,
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>> In order to be more inclusive and align with the Git<
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/<
> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>><<
> > > > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<
> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>>>>
> > > > > > >> and GitHub<
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> <
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > > > >
> > > > > > ><<
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > > > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>> standards for the default branch of new repositories, I
> > > would
> > > > > > >> like to
> > > > > > >> > >>> propose renaming the ‘master’ branch to ‘main’ in the
> > > > > > >> Arrow project. I
> > > > > > >> > am
> > > > > > >> > >>> not sure if there has already been discussion about
> this,
> > > but
> > > > > > >> I tried
> > > > > > >> > >>> searching the mailing list archives and did not see
> anyone
> > > > > > >> mention this
> > > > > > >> > >> yet.
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>> In terms of tooling, GitHub has enabled renaming
> branches
> > > > > > >> from the web
> > > > > > >> > >> UI<
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> <https://github.com/github/renaming<
> > > > https://github.com/github/renaming>><<
> > > > > > https://github.com/github/renaming<
> > > https://github.com/github/renaming
> > > > >>>>.
> > > > > > >> I’m happy to help with this
> > > > > > >> > change
> > > > > > >> > >>> in any way that I can!
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>> Thank you,
> > > > > > >> > >>> Fiona
> > > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > >> > >> --
> > > > > > >> > >> —
> > > > > > >> > >> *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
> > > > > > >> > >> Site: pacha.dev
> > > > > > >> > >> Blog: pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog><<
> > > > http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog>>>
> > > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
Posted by Jacob Wujciak <ja...@voltrondata.com.INVALID>.
Thanks for moving this forward! In apache/arrow we have an umbrella issue
[1] and I think we are at the point where we are ready to ask INFRA to
rename the default branch to main.
Thanks to Fiona and Kevin for their work on the hardcoded branch names in
the dev tooling that was blocking this!
Unless there are any objections we can initiate the switch after the
release.
[1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/31142
On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 8:49 PM MAURICIO ANDRES VARGAS SEPULVEDA
<ma...@uc.cl.invalid> wrote:
> yes, please!
>
>
> ———
>
> Mauricio Vargas Sepulveda
>
> Master's Representative
>
> UofT Political Science
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
> Sent: January 19, 2023 2:44 PM
> To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
>
> I have filed issues in the Arrow Rust repos (let me know if I missed any)
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3569
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4994
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista/issues/618
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/144
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
> > I am in favor of making the switch in arrow-rs as well -- can someone
> file
> > an issue so to start that discussion?
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:43 AM Kevin Gurney <kg...@mathworks.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Thank you for bringing up this topic again.
> > >
> > > @Neal - I am already the assignee for ARROW-15693, which involves
> > updating
> > > crossbow. I will work on completing this as soon as possible.
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > >
> > > Kevin Gurney
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Remzi Yang <13...@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 11:32 PM
> > > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
> > > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> > >
> > > Should we also do this change in arrow-rs?
> > >
> > > Remzi
> > >
> > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 11:25, Neal Richardson <
> > neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Many of the subtasks on
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>
> > > > have already been done. What's left is to update archery and
> crossbow,
> > > then
> > > > we can ask Infra to make the switch. Is anyone able to take those
> > > subtasks
> > > > on?
> > > >
> > > > Neal
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:58 PM Matthew Topol
> > > <matt@voltrondata.com.invalid
> > > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm in favor of it, for what it's worth.
> > > > >
> > > > > --Matt
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Jul 25 2022 at 02:56:31 PM -0600, Wes McKinney
> > > > > <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you think we could make a push to make this happen after the
> > 9.0.0
> > > > > > release goes out?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > Wes
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fiona La <fionala@mathworks.com
> > > > > > <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thank you Antoine for bringing up the engineering work that is
> > > > > >> required to enable this. And thank you Neal for sharing the link
> > to
> > > > > >> the previous discussion and creating the umbrella issue/breaking
> > > > > >> down the tasks in Jira.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> I am happy to work on these subtasks to move the effort forward;
> > > > > >> I’ll start with this subtask [1].
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1]: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692<
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> From: Neal Richardson <neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> > > > > >> <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > > > >> Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38 PM
> > > > > >> To: dev <dev@arrow.apache.org <ma...@arrow.apache.org>>
> > > > > >> Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> > > > > >> Good point Antoine, there is engineering work to be done to
> allow
> > > > > >> this.
> > > > > >> I've made an umbrella issue [1] and broke out a bunch of
> subtasks.
> > > > > >> The idea
> > > > > >> is to update our code (mostly CI stuff) to use the default
> branch,
> > > > > >> whatever
> > > > > >> it happens to be called, and then after that is done we will be
> > > > > >> able to ask
> > > > > >> INFRA to make the change. Those who are interested in seeing
> this
> > > > > >> happen
> > > > > >> can work on those subtasks, and we can check back once those are
> > > > > >> done.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Neal
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [1]:
> > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>><<
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Antoine Pitrou <
> > antoine@python.org
> > > > > >> <ma...@python.org>> wrote:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Le 14/02/2022 à 21:45, Neal Richardson a écrit :
> > > > > >> > > There was discussion of this back in 2020 [1], and the
> > > > > >> consensus at the
> > > > > >> > > time seemed to be to wait and see where git and GitHub would
> > > > > >> land before
> > > > > >> > > making what could be a disruptive change. I support
> reopening
> > > > > >> the
> > > > > >> > > discussion.
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > It looks like quite a few ASF projects have switched to
> 'main'
> > > > > >> by now
> > > > > >> > [2],
> > > > > >> > > and in order to do so, we'd need a vote/consensus thread
> here
> > > > > >> and then
> > > > > >> > make
> > > > > >> > > an INFRA issue (like [3]).
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > We also need someone to take responsibility for ensuring that
> > all
> > > > > >> CI
> > > > > >> > jobs and other automation is updated for the change.
> Presumably
> > > > > >> that
> > > > > >> > could be the proponent.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Regards
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > Antoine.
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > Neal
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > [1]:
> > > > > >> <
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
> > <
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>><<
> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<
> > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>>>
> > > > > >> > > [2]:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > > >
> > > > > ><<
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > > [3]:
> > > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>><<
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>>>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:25 PM Mauricio Vargas
> > > > > >> <mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid <ma...@uc.cl.invalid>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> > >> +1
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:24 PM Fiona La
> > > > > >> <fionala@mathworks.com <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>> Hello all,
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>> In order to be more inclusive and align with the Git<
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/<
> > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>><<
> > > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<
> > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>>>>
> > > > > >> and GitHub<
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> >
> > > > > >> <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > > >
> > > > > ><<
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > > >
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>> standards for the default branch of new repositories, I
> > would
> > > > > >> like to
> > > > > >> > >>> propose renaming the ‘master’ branch to ‘main’ in the
> > > > > >> Arrow project. I
> > > > > >> > am
> > > > > >> > >>> not sure if there has already been discussion about this,
> > but
> > > > > >> I tried
> > > > > >> > >>> searching the mailing list archives and did not see anyone
> > > > > >> mention this
> > > > > >> > >> yet.
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>> In terms of tooling, GitHub has enabled renaming branches
> > > > > >> from the web
> > > > > >> > >> UI<
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> <https://github.com/github/renaming<
> > > https://github.com/github/renaming>><<
> > > > > https://github.com/github/renaming<
> > https://github.com/github/renaming
> > > >>>>.
> > > > > >> I’m happy to help with this
> > > > > >> > change
> > > > > >> > >>> in any way that I can!
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>> Thank you,
> > > > > >> > >>> Fiona
> > > > > >> > >>>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >> --
> > > > > >> > >> —
> > > > > >> > >> *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
> > > > > >> > >> Site: pacha.dev
> > > > > >> > >> Blog: pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog><<
> > > http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog>>>
> > > > > >> > >>
> > > > > >> > >
> > > > > >> >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
Posted by MAURICIO ANDRES VARGAS SEPULVEDA <ma...@uc.cl.INVALID>.
yes, please!
———
Mauricio Vargas Sepulveda
Master's Representative
UofT Political Science
________________________________
From: Andy Grove <an...@gmail.com>
Sent: January 19, 2023 2:44 PM
To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
I have filed issues in the Arrow Rust repos (let me know if I missed any)
https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/3569
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/4994
https://github.com/apache/arrow-ballista/issues/618
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion-python/issues/144
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:19 AM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
> I am in favor of making the switch in arrow-rs as well -- can someone file
> an issue so to start that discussion?
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:43 AM Kevin Gurney <kg...@mathworks.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Thank you for bringing up this topic again.
> >
> > @Neal - I am already the assignee for ARROW-15693, which involves
> updating
> > crossbow. I will work on completing this as soon as possible.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Kevin Gurney
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Remzi Yang <13...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, July 25, 2022 11:32 PM
> > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <de...@arrow.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> >
> > Should we also do this change in arrow-rs?
> >
> > Remzi
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 at 11:25, Neal Richardson <
> neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Many of the subtasks on
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>
> > > have already been done. What's left is to update archery and crossbow,
> > then
> > > we can ask Infra to make the switch. Is anyone able to take those
> > subtasks
> > > on?
> > >
> > > Neal
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2022 at 4:58 PM Matthew Topol
> > <matt@voltrondata.com.invalid
> > > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm in favor of it, for what it's worth.
> > > >
> > > > --Matt
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 25 2022 at 02:56:31 PM -0600, Wes McKinney
> > > > <we...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Do you think we could make a push to make this happen after the
> 9.0.0
> > > > > release goes out?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > Wes
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 2:32 PM Fiona La <fionala@mathworks.com
> > > > > <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you Antoine for bringing up the engineering work that is
> > > > >> required to enable this. And thank you Neal for sharing the link
> to
> > > > >> the previous discussion and creating the umbrella issue/breaking
> > > > >> down the tasks in Jira.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am happy to work on these subtasks to move the effort forward;
> > > > >> I’ll start with this subtask [1].
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]: <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15692>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> From: Neal Richardson <neal.p.richardson@gmail.com
> > > > >> <ma...@gmail.com>>
> > > > >> Date: Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 3:38 PM
> > > > >> To: dev <dev@arrow.apache.org <ma...@arrow.apache.org>>
> > > > >> Subject: Re: Proposal: renaming the 'master' branch to 'main'
> > > > >> Good point Antoine, there is engineering work to be done to allow
> > > > >> this.
> > > > >> I've made an umbrella issue [1] and broke out a bunch of subtasks.
> > > > >> The idea
> > > > >> is to update our code (mostly CI stuff) to use the default branch,
> > > > >> whatever
> > > > >> it happens to be called, and then after that is done we will be
> > > > >> able to ask
> > > > >> INFRA to make the change. Those who are interested in seeing this
> > > > >> happen
> > > > >> can work on those subtasks, and we can check back once those are
> > > > >> done.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Neal
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [1]:
> > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>><<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-15689>>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:46 PM Antoine Pitrou <
> antoine@python.org
> > > > >> <ma...@python.org>> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Le 14/02/2022 à 21:45, Neal Richardson a écrit :
> > > > >> > > There was discussion of this back in 2020 [1], and the
> > > > >> consensus at the
> > > > >> > > time seemed to be to wait and see where git and GitHub would
> > > > >> land before
> > > > >> > > making what could be a disruptive change. I support reopening
> > > > >> the
> > > > >> > > discussion.
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > It looks like quite a few ASF projects have switched to 'main'
> > > > >> by now
> > > > >> > [2],
> > > > >> > > and in order to do so, we'd need a vote/consensus thread here
> > > > >> and then
> > > > >> > make
> > > > >> > > an INFRA issue (like [3]).
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > We also need someone to take responsibility for ensuring that
> all
> > > > >> CI
> > > > >> > jobs and other automation is updated for the change. Presumably
> > > > >> that
> > > > >> > could be the proponent.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Regards
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Antoine.
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > Neal
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > [1]:
> > > > >> <https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41
> <
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>><<
> > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41<
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/hyc6nxn6k2c19g9h4wj4khoysvwomj41>>>
> > > > >> > > [2]:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > >
> > > > ><<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > <
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20INFRA%20AND%20status%20%3D%20Closed%20AND%20text%20~%20%22main%20branch%22%20ORDER%20BY%20created%20DESC
> > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > > [3]:
> > > > >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>><<
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723<
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-21723>>>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:25 PM Mauricio Vargas
> > > > >> <mavargas11@uc.cl.invalid <ma...@uc.cl.invalid>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> > >> +1
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 3:24 PM Fiona La
> > > > >> <fionala@mathworks.com <ma...@mathworks.com>> wrote:
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>> Hello all,
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> In order to be more inclusive and align with the Git<
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> <https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname/<
> > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>><<
> > > > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname<
> > https://sfconservancy.org/news/2020/jun/23/gitbranchname>>>>
> > > > >> and GitHub<
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > >
> > > > ><<
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/github/renaming#new-repositories-use-main-as-the-default-branch-name
> > >
> > > > >>
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> standards for the default branch of new repositories, I
> would
> > > > >> like to
> > > > >> > >>> propose renaming the ‘master’ branch to ‘main’ in the
> > > > >> Arrow project. I
> > > > >> > am
> > > > >> > >>> not sure if there has already been discussion about this,
> but
> > > > >> I tried
> > > > >> > >>> searching the mailing list archives and did not see anyone
> > > > >> mention this
> > > > >> > >> yet.
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> In terms of tooling, GitHub has enabled renaming branches
> > > > >> from the web
> > > > >> > >> UI<
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> <https://github.com/github/renaming<
> > https://github.com/github/renaming>><<
> > > > https://github.com/github/renaming<
> https://github.com/github/renaming
> > >>>>.
> > > > >> I’m happy to help with this
> > > > >> > change
> > > > >> > >>> in any way that I can!
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>> Thank you,
> > > > >> > >>> Fiona
> > > > >> > >>>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >> --
> > > > >> > >> —
> > > > >> > >> *Mauricio 'Pachá' Vargas Sepúlveda*
> > > > >> > >> Site: pacha.dev
> > > > >> > >> Blog: pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog><<
> > http://pacha.dev/blog<http://pacha.dev/blog>>>
> > > > >> > >>
> > > > >> > >
> > > > >> >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>