You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> on 2021/01/28 06:49:51 UTC

[VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Hi all,

since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have reached a
consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP.

Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The vote will be
open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd.

Best,
Robert

[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
[2]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode

[RESULT][VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Posted by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>.

Thank you all for reviewing and voting on the FLIP!

It has been accepted!

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 4:58 AM Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for the efforts Robert!
>
> Best Regards,
> Yu
>
>
> On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 17:19, Matthias Pohl <ma...@ververica.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Robert and congratulations on your first FLIP.
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Matthias
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:22 AM Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Zhu
> > >
> > > Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2021年1月29日周五 下午10:23写道：
> > >
> > > > LGTM. Thanks for the work Robert!
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Till
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Robert for your great work on this FLIP. This is really a
> big
> > > step
> > > > > to make Flink auto scalable.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Yang
> > > > >
> > > > > Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> 于2021年1月28日周四 下午4:32写道：
> > > > >
> > > > > > @Yangze: That's something I overlooked. I should have waited. If
> > > > FLIP-160
> > > > > > is rejected or undergoes fundamental changes, I'll cancel this
> vote
> > > and
> > > > > > rewrite FLIP-159.
> > > > > > But I have the impression that there were no major concerns
> > regarding
> > > > > > FLIP-160 so far.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:46 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for driving this, Robert! LGTM.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > minor: Just a little confused about the program. It seems this
> > > > > > > proposal relies on the FLIP-160, which is still under
> discussion.
> > > > > > > Should we always vote for the prerequisite first?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Yangze Guo
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Xintong Song <
> > > tonysong820@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks Robert. LGTM.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thank you~
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Xintong Song
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger <
> > > > rmetzger@apache.org>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have
> > > > reached a
> > > > > > > > > consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment.
> The
> > > > vote
> > > > > > > will be
> > > > > > > > > open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > > Robert
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Posted by Yu Li <ca...@gmail.com>.

+1 (binding)

Thanks for the efforts Robert!

Best Regards,
Yu


On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 17:19, Matthias Pohl <ma...@ververica.com> wrote:

> Thanks Robert and congratulations on your first FLIP.
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Matthias
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:22 AM Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Zhu
> >
> > Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2021年1月29日周五 下午10:23写道：
> >
> > > LGTM. Thanks for the work Robert!
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Till
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Robert for your great work on this FLIP. This is really a big
> > step
> > > > to make Flink auto scalable.
> > > >
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Yang
> > > >
> > > > Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> 于2021年1月28日周四 下午4:32写道：
> > > >
> > > > > @Yangze: That's something I overlooked. I should have waited. If
> > > FLIP-160
> > > > > is rejected or undergoes fundamental changes, I'll cancel this vote
> > and
> > > > > rewrite FLIP-159.
> > > > > But I have the impression that there were no major concerns
> regarding
> > > > > FLIP-160 so far.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:46 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for driving this, Robert! LGTM.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > minor: Just a little confused about the program. It seems this
> > > > > > proposal relies on the FLIP-160, which is still under discussion.
> > > > > > Should we always vote for the prerequisite first?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Yangze Guo
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Xintong Song <
> > tonysong820@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Robert. LGTM.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you~
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Xintong Song
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger <
> > > rmetzger@apache.org>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have
> > > reached a
> > > > > > > > consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The
> > > vote
> > > > > > will be
> > > > > > > > open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > > Robert
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Posted by Matthias Pohl <ma...@ververica.com>.

Thanks Robert and congratulations on your first FLIP.
+1 (non-binding)

Matthias

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:22 AM Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Zhu
>
> Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2021年1月29日周五 下午10:23写道：
>
> > LGTM. Thanks for the work Robert!
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Till
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Robert for your great work on this FLIP. This is really a big
> step
> > > to make Flink auto scalable.
> > >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Yang
> > >
> > > Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> 于2021年1月28日周四 下午4:32写道：
> > >
> > > > @Yangze: That's something I overlooked. I should have waited. If
> > FLIP-160
> > > > is rejected or undergoes fundamental changes, I'll cancel this vote
> and
> > > > rewrite FLIP-159.
> > > > But I have the impression that there were no major concerns regarding
> > > > FLIP-160 so far.
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:46 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for driving this, Robert! LGTM.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > minor: Just a little confused about the program. It seems this
> > > > > proposal relies on the FLIP-160, which is still under discussion.
> > > > > Should we always vote for the prerequisite first?
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Yangze Guo
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Xintong Song <
> tonysong820@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Robert. LGTM.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thank you~
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Xintong Song
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger <
> > rmetzger@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have
> > reached a
> > > > > > > consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The
> > vote
> > > > > will be
> > > > > > > open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > > Robert
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Posted by Zhu Zhu <re...@gmail.com>.

+1 (binding)

Thanks,
Zhu

Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org> 于2021年1月29日周五 下午10:23写道：

> LGTM. Thanks for the work Robert!
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Robert for your great work on this FLIP. This is really a big step
> > to make Flink auto scalable.
> >
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > Best,
> > Yang
> >
> > Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> 于2021年1月28日周四 下午4:32写道：
> >
> > > @Yangze: That's something I overlooked. I should have waited. If
> FLIP-160
> > > is rejected or undergoes fundamental changes, I'll cancel this vote and
> > > rewrite FLIP-159.
> > > But I have the impression that there were no major concerns regarding
> > > FLIP-160 so far.
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:46 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks for driving this, Robert! LGTM.
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > minor: Just a little confused about the program. It seems this
> > > > proposal relies on the FLIP-160, which is still under discussion.
> > > > Should we always vote for the prerequisite first?
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Yangze Guo
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks Robert. LGTM.
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 (binding)
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you~
> > > > >
> > > > > Xintong Song
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger <
> rmetzger@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have
> reached a
> > > > > > consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The
> vote
> > > > will be
> > > > > > open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Robert
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > [2]
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Posted by Till Rohrmann <tr...@apache.org>.

LGTM. Thanks for the work Robert!

+1 (binding)

Cheers,
Till

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Robert for your great work on this FLIP. This is really a big step
> to make Flink auto scalable.
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> Best,
> Yang
>
> Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> 于2021年1月28日周四 下午4:32写道：
>
> > @Yangze: That's something I overlooked. I should have waited. If FLIP-160
> > is rejected or undergoes fundamental changes, I'll cancel this vote and
> > rewrite FLIP-159.
> > But I have the impression that there were no major concerns regarding
> > FLIP-160 so far.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:46 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks for driving this, Robert! LGTM.
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > minor: Just a little confused about the program. It seems this
> > > proposal relies on the FLIP-160, which is still under discussion.
> > > Should we always vote for the prerequisite first?
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Yangze Guo
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks Robert. LGTM.
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > Thank you~
> > > >
> > > > Xintong Song
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have reached a
> > > > > consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP.
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The vote
> > > will be
> > > > > open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Robert
> > > > >
> > > > > [1]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > > [2]
> > > > >
> > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode
> > > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Posted by Yang Wang <da...@gmail.com>.

Thanks Robert for your great work on this FLIP. This is really a big step
to make Flink auto scalable.

+1 (non-binding)


Best,
Yang

Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> 于2021年1月28日周四 下午4:32写道：

> @Yangze: That's something I overlooked. I should have waited. If FLIP-160
> is rejected or undergoes fundamental changes, I'll cancel this vote and
> rewrite FLIP-159.
> But I have the impression that there were no major concerns regarding
> FLIP-160 so far.
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:46 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for driving this, Robert! LGTM.
> >
> > +1
> >
> > minor: Just a little confused about the program. It seems this
> > proposal relies on the FLIP-160, which is still under discussion.
> > Should we always vote for the prerequisite first?
> >
> > Best,
> > Yangze Guo
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks Robert. LGTM.
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thank you~
> > >
> > > Xintong Song
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have reached a
> > > > consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The vote
> > will be
> > > > open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Robert
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > > [2]
> > > >
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode
> > > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Posted by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>.

@Yangze: That's something I overlooked. I should have waited. If FLIP-160
is rejected or undergoes fundamental changes, I'll cancel this vote and
rewrite FLIP-159.
But I have the impression that there were no major concerns regarding
FLIP-160 so far.

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:46 AM Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for driving this, Robert! LGTM.
>
> +1
>
> minor: Just a little confused about the program. It seems this
> proposal relies on the FLIP-160, which is still under discussion.
> Should we always vote for the prerequisite first?
>
> Best,
> Yangze Guo
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Robert. LGTM.
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thank you~
> >
> > Xintong Song
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have reached a
> > > consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP.
> > >
> > > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The vote
> will be
> > > open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Robert
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > > [2]
> > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode
> > >
>

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Posted by Yangze Guo <ka...@gmail.com>.

Thanks for driving this, Robert! LGTM.

+1

minor: Just a little confused about the program. It seems this
proposal relies on the FLIP-160, which is still under discussion.
Should we always vote for the prerequisite first?

Best,
Yangze Guo


On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Robert. LGTM.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thank you~
>
> Xintong Song
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have reached a
> > consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP.
> >
> > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The vote will be
> > open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd.
> >
> > Best,
> > Robert
> >
> > [1]
> >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> > [2]
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode
> >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Posted by Xintong Song <to...@gmail.com>.

Thanks Robert. LGTM.

+1 (binding)

Thank you~

Xintong Song



On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have reached a
> consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP.
>
> Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP, or -1 with a comment. The vote will be
> open at least until Tuesday, Feb 2nd.
>
> Best,
> Robert
>
> [1]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ra688faf9dca036500f0445c55671e70ba96c70f942afe650e9db8374%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
> [2]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-159%3A+Reactive+Mode
>