You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by "Marshall Schor (JIRA)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2011/07/17 18:09:00 UTC

[jira] [Created] (UIMA-2171) Rename package name for UIMA "Vinci" transport

Rename package name for UIMA "Vinci" transport
----------------------------------------------

                 Key: UIMA-2171
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2171
             Project: UIMA
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: Transport Adapters - SOAP, Vinci
    Affects Versions: 2.3.1
            Reporter: Marshall Schor
            Priority: Minor


We maybe should consider changing the package name for the Vinci transport adapter used in UIMA.  Its current package is org.apache.vinci ....

Should this be changed to org.apache.uima.vinci ?

And would changing this cause API breckage?  If so, maybe we should just leave this alone until someone complains :-).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

[jira] [Resolved] (UIMA-2171) Rename package name for UIMA "Vinci" transport

Posted by "Marshall Schor (Resolved) (JIRA)" <de...@uima.apache.org>.
     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2171?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Marshall Schor resolved UIMA-2171.
----------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

I think it's best to leave this alone for now, to avoid "renaming" churn for our users.
                
> Rename package name for UIMA "Vinci" transport
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-2171
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2171
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Transport Adapters - SOAP, Vinci
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.1
>            Reporter: Marshall Schor
>            Priority: Minor
>
> We maybe should consider changing the package name for the Vinci transport adapter used in UIMA.  Its current package is org.apache.vinci ....
> Should this be changed to org.apache.uima.vinci ?
> And would changing this cause API breckage?  If so, maybe we should just leave this alone until someone complains :-).

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira