You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/09/11 07:58:57 UTC
[jira] Created: (LANG-532) Consider code in Collections
Consider code in Collections
----------------------------
Key: LANG-532
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-532
Project: Commons Lang
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Henri Yandell
Fix For: 3.0
If and only if Collections be considered dead for 4.x and beyond, then consider if there is any code that wants to be scavenged to live in Lang 3.x.
Basic rules:
* No implementations of Collections.
* If a successor of Collections defined, then not something it has.
Basically potential additions to java.util.Collections I suspect.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (LANG-532) Consider code in Collections
Posted by "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789715#action_12789715 ]
Henri Yandell commented on LANG-532:
------------------------------------
I also think the Comparators themselves are interesting to Lang. Specifically:
NullComparator
ReverseComparator
ComparableComparator (which we now have a private copy of)
ComparatorChain
FixedOrderComparator
Basically all but BooleanComparator (which I think is useless and should be deleted) and TransformerComparator.
ComparatorUtils itself is mostly factory methods for these objects - I'm not sure we particularly need them. Also includes a min(Object,Object,Comparator) method which isn't too useful (basically null protection on the Comparator, with the 'odd' behaviour that it uses a ComparableComparator (even if not Comparable by the look of it).
We also have LANG-483 wanting to add a ComparisonUtils class.
> Consider code in Collections
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-532
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-532
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Henri Yandell
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> If and only if Collections be considered dead for 4.x and beyond, then consider if there is any code that wants to be scavenged to live in Lang 3.x.
> Basic rules:
> * No implementations of Collections.
> * If a successor of Collections defined, then not something it has.
> Basically potential additions to java.util.Collections I suspect.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (LANG-532) Consider code in Collections
Posted by "Sebb (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840590#action_12840590 ]
Sebb commented on LANG-532:
---------------------------
I suggest:
COLLECTIONS-354 - add Collection utilities from MINA
> Consider code in Collections
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-532
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-532
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: General
> Reporter: Henri Yandell
> Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> If and only if Collections be considered dead for 4.x and beyond, then consider if there is any code that wants to be scavenged to live in Lang 3.x.
> Basic rules:
> * No implementations of Collections.
> * If a successor of Collections defined, then not something it has.
> Basically potential additions to java.util.Collections I suspect.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (LANG-532) Consider code in Collections
Posted by "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12767723#action_12767723 ]
Henri Yandell commented on LANG-532:
------------------------------------
Not convinced that Collections will make it to 4.0.
Non decorator code in the various util.* Utils packages is what will be of interest:
CollectionUtils
MapUtils
ListUtils
IteratorUtils
SetUtils
ComparatorUtils
> Consider code in Collections
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-532
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-532
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Henri Yandell
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> If and only if Collections be considered dead for 4.x and beyond, then consider if there is any code that wants to be scavenged to live in Lang 3.x.
> Basic rules:
> * No implementations of Collections.
> * If a successor of Collections defined, then not something it has.
> Basically potential additions to java.util.Collections I suspect.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (LANG-532) Consider code in Collections
Posted by "Henri Yandell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-532?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Henri Yandell updated LANG-532:
-------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
3.1
Moving to 3.1 - this doesn't affect compatibility so can be put off.
> Consider code in Collections
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-532
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-532
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: General
> Reporter: Henri Yandell
> Fix For: 3.1
>
>
> If and only if Collections be considered dead for 4.x and beyond, then consider if there is any code that wants to be scavenged to live in Lang 3.x.
> Basic rules:
> * No implementations of Collections.
> * If a successor of Collections defined, then not something it has.
> Basically potential additions to java.util.Collections I suspect.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.