You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Greg Hudson <gh...@MIT.EDU> on 2004/07/29 02:08:02 UTC
Re: svn commit: r10438 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_fs_fs
libsvn_ra_svn libsvn_subr tests/libsvn_delta
On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 20:42, jerenkrantz@tigris.org wrote:
> APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS is not recommended.
It isn't? Why not? I don't see any indication in apr_errno.h that it's
deprecated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: svn commit: r10438 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_fs_fs
libsvn_ra_svn libsvn_subr tests/libsvn_delta
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
--On Wednesday, July 28, 2004 10:08 PM -0400 Greg Hudson <gh...@MIT.EDU>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 20:42, jerenkrantz@tigris.org wrote:
>> APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS is not recommended.
>
> It isn't? Why not? I don't see any indication in apr_errno.h that it's
> deprecated.
There was a dev@apr thread today that brought up that APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS
snuck back in to Subversion: we had previously gone through SVN and tossed
those before. (APR_STATUS_IS_SUCCESS was mis-used by some APR folks
internally when they added that macro. APR_SUCCESS is always defined to be 0
- no other value is legitimate.)
*shrug* -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org